User talk:Arnav Bhate

spice jet a340 cargo
he (jetstreamer) removed because no source I added source and a 340 pls don’t remove Wafer999 (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Simpleflying is not a WP:RS. See WP:RSPSIMPLEFLYING. Arnav Bhate (talk) 04:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Vande Bharat Express services for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Vande Bharat Express services is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Vande Bharat Express services until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BhandupAamche (talk) 13:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Wrong input of Air India's A350-900s
Hi @Arnav_Bhate, the data you put for A350-900s is wrong. Only 2 have been delivered to Air India. I don't think you can include it in the fleet if they are not delivered. Source: https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Air-India

even here you can see that they only put 2 A350-900s in "In Service" column and 4 A350-900s are in 'future' column. I hope that everything is clarified now, and that my edit was correct only. Please stop editing it wrong. Kokofruitkt (talk) 11:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Airbus is more reliable than planespotters. If Airbus says they delivered 6 A350s then we say Air India got 6 A350s. The Airbus source is already in the article. Please see it. Arnav Bhate (talk) 15:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ahh yes, they are delivered yet have not started operations. For them, if they have painted the livery and tests are done, then they consider it as delivered. By that logic, there are many Air India's a320 neos, that are already in Toulousse, waiting for delivery. Should include them in the fleet too, according to your logic. Kokofruitkt (talk) 02:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * And btw you can clearly see that the column where you are editing wrong, clearly says "in service". How is a plane in 'in service' if it's in Toulousse? The column doesn't say "total planes". Kokofruitkt (talk) 04:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Provide a source for that. As you can see here, Airbus says AI is operating all 6 A350s that they have delivered. Arnav Bhate (talk) 06:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Show me their flight history from flight radar, if they are operating them. You should prove, since you are the one changing it. Bet you don't even know their registrations, so here they are :VT-JRE, VT-JRF, VT-JRH, VT-JRI. Show me their flight history. And like I said, you should also add the A320 neos which are not even delivered, according to your logic. Kokofruitkt (talk) 13:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I do know their registrations. Also, where does the Airbus source say Air India is operating more than 41 A320neos? The latest report, in January says 38 and since then 3 more have been delivered. I have provided a source that says Air India is operating them, it is up to you to provide one that says Air India isn't. Also, we have included aircraft that planespotters says are parked in the in service tally. Arnav Bhate (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You know what, keep editing it wrong, no one even trusts wikipedia lol, cuz it is an open source website, edited by people like you. Kokofruitkt (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I only want a source that says Air India doesn't have them that would be more reliable than Airbus, while also being up-to-date, so I can put it in the article. Probably the only source that meets this is Air India itself. Arnav Bhate (talk) 06:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You just want source, even if it says wrong. Airbus clearly has weong data, or I think they consider a plane delivered, once they are done with tests. But Air India hasn't taken the delivery of 4 aircrafts. Till now only VT-JRA and VT-JRB are delivered. You can even check Air India's twitter, their last post about A350, was their 2nd A350 which is A350. And yes they do tweet about all the new A350 deliveries. So if they all the 6 were delivered, then they would have tweeted about it. But till now only 2 A350s are delivered according to their twitter.
 * x.com/airindia/status/1753780106651443299?s=20 Kokofruitkt (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I see another user has added a source. That source seems fine so I will let it be. Arnav Bhate (talk) 07:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorting in IR electrification tables
You undid my edit of the Indian Railways electrification stat tables in Central Organisation for Railway Electrification claiming that it "Does not do anything". What it does is exclude the summary line from sorting. Without it, if you click on any of the column headers to sort according to that column, the sum will also be considered, which produces odd results if you click the first column (State resp. Zone in alphabetic order) or the last column (where the percentage for the total is the weighed mean of the states/zones and thus will be somewhere in the middle). Even for the other two columns, it's still weird to have the sum on top when you set the table in descending order.

So I reverted your revert, but I posted a more detailed explanation here. Rontombontom (talk) 13:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made&#32;to Vande Metro: you may already know about them, but you might find Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.  Rah ' io ' 1234  08:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Vande Metro
Hey Arnav, I've found some information stating the features regarding this service as well as the Vande Bharat Sleeper trainset. Should I add them in the trainset page or in the main page?? This is for both the upcoming types of train services. Reference has been shared to you:- Do check them out and let me know when and under which page to be added. Thank you. Sameer2905 (talk) 16:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)


 * In the Vande Metro an Vande Bharat (sleeper trainset) pages. Do try to find the original article rather than the one from MSN. Arnav Bhate (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Arnav Bhate,
 * Whatever points mentioned in the MSN is a subpage of the original news article from Times of India, which I later found out. If that's fine from your end, then ONLY will I add those designated points but in simple English to those article pages. Sameer2905 (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure Arnav Bhate (talk) 09:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)