User talk:Arne Müseler

Your image additions
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. '''Please note that adding masses of self-taken images is neither wanted nor tolerated as it is considered self-promotion, especially when deleting other already existing images by other users without reason. Therefore, your additions have mostly been undone.''' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.118.194 (talk) 20:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * In the last few minutes you have removed almost all my photos from articles. I have inserted all photos to the best of my ability. if I have exchanged photos, then always according to the criteria of quality, size and timeliness. maybe we can discuss one, two photos, but simply removing them is not fair and frustrating. Sometimes I create extra photos for wikipedia, if I am of the opinion that the previous photos are not good enough, such as at the airport istanbul. I would be happy about a reason of the mass deletion. --Arne mueseler (talk) 20:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * It is widespread consensus here that adding self-taken images to articles in masses like you did is not wanted here. It is considered disruptive self-promotion, especially if you maintain a photography website and are replacing other good images with your own ones for no good reason. That is why your images are getting deleted. Feel free to add images where we actually need new or better ones without rating other users work as not good enough where it clearly is not the case. Best regards.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Arne Müseler,

This is to let you know that File:Henties bay.jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for February 9, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-02-09. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 06:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the hint, I will be more careful from now on. Arne Müseler (talk) 06:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Lakolk
Hi Arne,

Thanks for creating Lakolk. Please in the future when creating articles like this try to adequately source it per Reliable sources and Verifiability. Don't create articles without properly sourcing every sentence, not every reviewer has the patience or time to that like i did, some may just move it to draft. Happy editing. Jamiebuba (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)