User talk:Arnecfi

Talkback
Checking into it. Joe Gazz84 (user)•(talk)•(contribs) 22:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Peter Mountford
You should read this WP:BIO. Then re-submit it, since the only issue was there is not enough information for it to be considered accurate, users on Wikipedia like to have everything complete and with some missing facts the accuracy could be challenged. Joe Gazz84 (user)•(talk)•(contribs) 22:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Happysailor (Talk) 18:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(t&#124;c) 12:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Peter Mountford (author), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Yossiea (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Reality Hunger
Reality Hunger: A Manifesto is a book by American writer David Shields, published by Knopf on February 23, 2010. The book is written in a collage style, mixing quotations by the author with those from a variety of other sources. The book’s manifesto is directed toward increasing art’s engagement with the reality of contemporary life through the exploration of new, hybrid genres such as prose poetry and literary collage. Overturning the stigma of artistic appropriation and redefining the relationship between fiction and nonfiction are also central themes.

Structure
Reality Hunger consists of 618 numbered passages divided into twenty-six chapters. Approximately half of the book’s words come from sources other than the author. Attribution for the quotes is given in an appendix at the end of the book, but with the author’s encouragement to cut those pages from the book so as to preserve the book’s intended disorienting effect.

Major themes
The title of Reality Hunger comes from Shields’s idea that people today, living in an increasingly fragmentary culture, are experiencing a growing “hunger” for doses of real life injected into the art they experience. According to his argument, traditional genres, such as realist fiction, are failing to adequately reflect lived reality because they have gone largely unchanged since their early development.

The role of plagiarism in art also constitutes a major theme. Shields argues that plagiarism is something that artists have always partaken in, and that only recently has the act acquired the stigma it has, due in large part to copyright legislation and the culture surrounding it. Rather than shy away from wholesale appropriation, Shields encourages it, stating that “reality-based art hijacks its material and doesn’t apologize.”

Shields also discusses, at length, the distinction between memoir and fiction-a distinction that, Shields argues, is mostly imaginary. Because writers of fiction implement a great deal of material directly from their lives, and because writers of memoir must rely on memories that don’t necessarily reflect the truth of what occurred, it would seem absurd to hold the two different kinds of writer to such different standards. “Anything processed by memory is fiction,” Shields writes, indicating that anything written by a writer supposedly doing memoir has necessarily already been fictionalized; thus, determining whether certain events in the book actually happened or not is not the correct way in which to determine the book’s value. The scandal surrounding James Frey’s A Million Little Pieces figures largely in one chapter, as Shields argues that Frey’s mistake was not lying in his so-called memoir but apologizing about it afterwards. “I’m disappointed not that Frey is a liar but that he isn’t a better one,” Shields writes. “He should have said, ‘’Everyone who writes about himself is a liar. I created a person meaner, funnier, more filled with life than I could ever be’’. . . Instead, he showed up for his whipping.”

Shields also places great importance on working in and creating new artistic forms, emphasizing in particular that the boundaries of genre (which he refers to as a “minimum-security prison” ) should constantly be bent and broken. An entire chapter is devoted to collage (a genre or “antigenre” of which Reality Hunger itself is explicitly a member), which Shields praises as “an evolution beyond narrative ” because it does not, he argues, reinforce false ideas about the world such as the inevitability of resolution that traditional narrative does: “Story seems to say that everything happens for a reason and I want to say, No, it doesn’t.”

Reception
Reviews of Reality Hunger were generally favorable. Shortly after its release, Chuck Klosterman tweeted that it ‘‘might be the most intense, thought-accelerating book of the last 10 years.” Luc Sante wrote in the New York Times Book Review that the book “urgently and succinctly addresses matters that have been in the air, have relentlessly gathered momentum, and have just been waiting for someone to link them together. . . . [Shields’s] book probably heralds what will be the dominant modes in years and decades to come.’’

The book also evoked a substantial amount of controversy, most of which centered around Shields’s claims about the death of the novel and his advocacy of artistic plagiarism. James Wood was one of the book’s most prominent critics, describing it in his review in the New Yorker as “highly problematic” in its “unexamined promotion of what he insists on calling ‘reality’ over narrative.”.

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Reality Hunger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  maucho  eagle   ( c ) 23:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider