User talk:Arnie Gov

Ham
Ham does have the connotation of 'Black', in a skintone sense. The meaning has been moderated for PC reasons in most sources. In many lexicons the term 'sunburnt' is used, but the real meaning here is 'black' as in black skin. Sorry if this irritates your racism sensibilities, but thats what the word means.

< did you follow this link?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.110.72.49 (talk) 12:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC).

Just FYI
Mormons are christians: the definition of christian is a follower of christ. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mbatman72 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC).

Image copyright problem with Image:,pl--ok-okm.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:,pl--ok-okm.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

What are you up to?
Hi Arnie: Could you please explain these edits:  ? (at the Sephardi Jews article.) This may be considered Vandalism and you are advised not to insert such frivolous photos into main articles. Feel free to discuss any questions you may have that connect with Judaism in any way at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism. Thank you. IZAK 09:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

NPOV
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 15:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:01mosaic3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01mosaic3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:01mosaic3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01mosaic3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 11:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:01mosaic2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01mosaic2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:01mosaic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01mosaic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

File:Carleton S Coon Racial Definitions8.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carleton S Coon Racial Definitions8.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:47, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

File:WorldRaces1.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WorldRaces1.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

File:JesseJacksonGirl.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JesseJacksonGirl.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 23:20, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Polygenism.JPG


The file File:Polygenism.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused and unlikely to be used - reflects an outdated, fringe theory and is not WP:NPOV (and not contextualised as fringe/non-NPOV). Also lacks any reference to reliable sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Begoon 06:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:WorldRaces2.JPG


The file File:WorldRaces2.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused and unlikely to be used - reflects an outdated, fringe theory and is not WP:NPOV (and not contextualised as fringe/non-NPOV). Also lacks any reference to reliable sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Begoon 06:57, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:JaphethShemHam87.jpg


The file File:JaphethShemHam87.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused and unlikely to be used - reflects an outdated, fringe theory and is not WP:NPOV (and not contextualised as fringe/non-NPOV). Also lacks any reference to reliable sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Begoon 06:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:JaphethShemHam88.jpg


The file File:JaphethShemHam88.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused and unlikely to be used - reflects an outdated, fringe theory and is not WP:NPOV (and not contextualised as fringe/non-NPOV). Also lacks any reference to reliable sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Begoon 06:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)