User talk:ArnoldReinhold/Archive 2

Disambiguation link notification for July 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited City of Boerne v. Flores, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fourteenth Amendment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Fixed--agr (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Dictionary Act of 1871
It's become quite notable given it's primary contribution to current SCOTUS cases dealing with Hobby Lobby and Citizen's United, (and various other cases I'm finding from searches) that it deserves it's own article. What debate went on in the country and congress in 1870 as they tried to decide what the word "person" meant in the 1868 14th amendment? How did corporation get to be included in the definition of person then? Alatari (talk) 10:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not a legal historian, and have no information about what happened in 1870, but this source http://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/hobby-lobby-and-the-dictionary-act suggests that it was purely administrative and I would not be surprised if there were no debate. If you think about it, most laws are restrictive, "no person shall..." or "each person must..." so the Dictionary Act merely makes it clear that such laws also apply to corporations. Note that there is a big difference between Hobby Lobby and Citizen's United.  The later deals with First Amendment constitutional issues and the Dictionary Act is not mentioned anywhere in that Supreme Court decision.  In Hobby Lobby the court is interpreting an act of Congress, the RFRA, so the Dictionary Act came into play because Congress said that is how the word person is to be understood unless context suggests otherwise.  The dissent argued for there indeed being a difference in context, but the majority disagreed. But as I read it, I don't think the Dictionary Act was central to the majority's ruling. I think their main argument is that that there is nothing in RFRA that says a group of individuals lose their right under RFRA when they decide to incorporate as a for-profit (as opposed to a non-profit, which both sides agree would be covered). The best the dissent could come up with is that the RFRA was intended to restore the law prior to Employment Division v. Smith and there were no cases giving religious freedom to for-profits prior to Smith. Again, the majority did not buy this, but it had nothing to do with the Dictionary Act. An article on the Dictionary Act might still be warranted, if you can find enough sources.--agr (talk) 12:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I did some more reading after posting this comment to your page and understand better how the 1st amendment, covering news organizations, had lent protection to corporations and so the precedent for Citizen's is as old as the Bill of Rights. What I still don't understand is what changed in 1870 to allow a widening of these rights by defining person as a corporation.  I've searched for another 50 minutes and haven't found the author or sponsor of the Dictionary Act.  There's a lot of information about on the use of the Dictionary Act in cases.  This article from SLU Law School: THE UNEASY RELATIONSHIP OF HOBBY LOBBY, CONESTOGA WOOD, THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, AND THE CORPORATE PERSON: HOW A HISTORICAL MYTH CONTINUES TO BEDEVIL THE LEGAL SYSTEM - MALCOLM J. HARKINS III* is an interesting read and maybe Harkins would know more about the DA-1871's creation. Alatari (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure the Dictionary Act has any bearing on First Amendment or any other Constitutional rights. The Act's preamble, 1 USC 1 says "In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress...", nothing about the meaning of the Constitution. And the Supreme Court made it clear in City of Boerne v. Flores that Congress does not have the power to significantly widen or narrow constitutional rights. --agr (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The Dictionary Act widened the meaning of the 14th amendment by defining person to include corporations. It has no bearing on the First.  Alatari (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * As I pointed out above, the Dictionary Act only applies to acts of Congress, not the Constitution. And I'm not so sure the Act expanded the definition of person as opposed to codifying an existing understanding. We'd need reliable sources to substantiate any such claim.--agr (talk) 06:24, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm still searching for sources about the creation of the Act and later commentary about it. I've contacted a lawyer from SLU for help.  Alatari (talk) 20:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, Malcolm J. Harkins III, J.D. who wrote the an article dealing with Hobby Lobby heavily referencing the Dictionary Act called and explained what he understood of it's creation but wasn't relevant to his article. Before 1871 all statutes had their own definition section and in that time it was all hand written and could amount to hundreds of  hours of extra work writing out each definition section.  A commission was formed to gather up the previous definitions and create a single compiled version.  So the Dictionary Act is a compromise of various prior statute definition sections hashed out by committee.  Obviously not all earlier statute's definitions were in agreement.  It was composed of some important law makers but I don't have a source for it yet.  Harkins said the earlier statutes were revised by pulling their dictionary sections. So yes, the person=corporation was evolving many years before the Dictionary Act which would overlap with the Corporate personhood article.  That article could then include more information prior to 1871 (it's got a few very early and most after 1886) as the statutes before Dictionary Act including person=corporation must have been numerous.  Harkin mentioned one about cigar sales in D.C. area but couldn't remember the exact name.  A section on the compilation of the Dictionary Act maybe suitable in Corporate personhood but if all prior statutes have been amended with pulling their dictionary sections it'll be near impossible (without seeing scanned in original documents) to figure out which statutes from 1790 to 1871 helped develop the personhood concept and hard to tell which were notable other than the ones that are already in that article.
 * The Dictionary Act has been a fall back for hundreds of appellate and SCOTUS rulings and now is referenced in several notable news sources after Hobby Lobby so it passes WP:Notable if just for a few paragraphs. Harkin was in the SCOTUS gallery when the Hobby Lobby decision was happening.  He made mention of amending the Dictionary Act or Religious Freedom Restoration Act as discussions for future actions.  Alatari (talk) 22:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

For what it's worth, we already have a Title 1 of the United States Code article, which includes the Dictionary Act as chapter 1. It might be worth adding a history section to that article. Note that only a handful of terms are defined in the Dictionary Act and it by no means eliminated definition sections in other laws, which are still quite common.--agr (talk) 02:34, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Mathematics/Sandbox
Talk:Mathematics/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Mathematics/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Mathematics/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Shared use paths
Based on the new article you created, I reclassified the Milton Keynes redway system as a shared use path rather than a cycleway - but now you have added a rider about 'not the same'. Could you clarify? Why does it matter? Wp:duck and all that! And what about the Netherlands, which has a lot of shared off-carriageway paths? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I used the term "exclusive" to distinguish cycleways that are bicycle only. It is only a first cut. Feel free to clarify things further and add more material, especially on a per country basis, if you have it. I think there is a lot to be said, more than a section in Cycling infrastructure.--agr (talk) 22:23, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I understood 'exclusive' but not 'US v UK definitions of "shared" not the same'. I wondered why you thought it significant? It would help if I could read the Cheshire.gov.UK document but it seems unreachable. I can't find a design spec for the Milton Keynes redways either - I've emailed to ask where it is but not holding my breath before the schools go back.
 * And just to add some spice to the mix, have you seen Peachtree City, Georgia? How to categorise that??
 * Yes, the new article is a good start. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 22:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * By the way, Cycling in the Netherlands says that shared paths are very rare so on my brief trip there either I saw one of the rare examples or more likely I'm suffering from false memory syndrome :-) --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Can we move this discussion to Talk:Shared use path? If you could repeat your comments there, I'll respond there.--agr (talk) 03:29, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

What was the RAMAC price and capacity?
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Hard_disk_drive. &#x0020;Please help end the duologue on capacity and price of the IBM RAMAC Model 350 disk file. Thanks. Tom94022 (talk) 21:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

What is the capacity of a CD-ROM
Hi Arnold So my counter question, here, so as to not further gum up the HDD talk page is, What is the capacity of a 650 MB CD-ROM?

From a data interface viewpoint it is channel bit serial just like the 350. At some point the analog signal is converted to channel bits and then further up the data channel to characters and then finally verified, 6 bit characters in the 350 and 8 bit bytes in the CD-ROM. The information below is extracted from The New Papyrus regarding the CD-ROM

The CD-ROM records in blocks of 2048 data bytes. To the 2048 data bytes the controller adds 304 bytes of gap and check bytes for a total of 2352 channel bytes per data block. It then encodes them using an 8-bit to 14-bit code to which it adds 2 merging bits so that each channel byte is in fact recorded as 2 encoded channel bytes. The net result is for each 2048 block of data bytes = 16,384 data bits there are 2352*16 = 37,632 channel bits, a ratio of 2.3 channel bits to 1 data bit. Note that each data byte is represented by 16 channel bits; as I follow your reasoning, there is nothing that stops one from replacing those 16 channel bits with two data bytes.

A 650 MB CD-ROM has precisely 333,000 blocks of 2048 data bytes but if I were to use some of the gap or check bits for data I could store as much as 1.4 GB on the medium - so why can't I say the CD-ROM is 1.4 GB? Or better yet, go into the business of making drives with controllers that do so, for BlueRay of course? Tom94022 (talk) 20:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Tom,
 * The interface between your CD-ROM drive and the computer only presents up to 650 MB to the computer. If there were a "raw mode" in the controller that let you access the gap or check bits, then yes it would arguably have higher capacity and likely someone would have found an application for that, maybe storing surveillance video where an occasional dropout might be a fair trade off for greater capacity. In the case of the 305 RAMAC system, the 350 disk drive presented a 7-bit data path to the CPU; the 350 neither knew nor cared that one of those bits was a parity bit. Hooked to another machine it could have stored 7 bits of data, and apparently the IBM 650 version used those 7 bits to store biquinary digits. Again, I'm not saying this is the only way to look at the 350's capacity, only that it is a legitimate viewpoint.--agr (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Arnold
 * I'm pretty sure the 350 presented a bit serial interface to its controller just like the ST506, but let me check. Tom94022 (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Figures 84 and 85 of the IBM's CE manual show a single write bit in and a single read bit out, a bit serial interface just like most drives until the 1990s. I've asked my friends at the RAMAC Restoration project to confirm but I'm pretty sure that's the way it was.  Actually I think the whole machine was bit serial to keep hardware cost down, but I could be wrong on this point.
 * I could buy a BluRay mechanism and do my own data channel controller operating on the "raw" mode coming in/out of the single head. So should I go out and raise money based upon your assurances that I can freely substitute data bits for channel bits? :-)
 * I agree that the 355 probably used 7 channel bits to represent the equivalent of 4 data bits which means it was less efficient than the 350 channel code and therefore had a lower equivalent information content, other wise known as capacity, 3 MB vs 3.75 MB. You can always put a lesser amount of information into a channel than its known capacity, but not more with out running the risk of exceeding the channels capacity and loosing information. But this is at this point original research.  Tom94022 (talk) 23:26, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The data coming off a BlueRay read/write head is an analog stream requiring a very substantial amount of processing to recover a digital data. The signal coming off an 350 cable connectors, as I understand it, is a digital bit stream that would be trivial to interface to a modern computer. That is the difference. The 355 example shows the the basic drive is agnostic as to the format of the bits it is storing. If you want to talk information content, the 350 is only storing characters from an alphabet of 48 symbols. That is only 5.61 bits per character, not 6. So from a Shannon information content point of view, the capacity of the 350 is equivalent to 3.49 million octets, not 3.75MB. Again there is no one right answer here.--agr (talk) 20:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The data coming off the RAMAC read/write head is an analog stream requiring a very substantial amount of processing by 1956 standards to recover digital data; u might want to read "A Self-Clocking System for Information Transfer" L.D. Seader, IBM JRD, April 1957, which has sketches of the analog and digital signals. To my eye they don't look a lot different than today's signals - just way lower frequency.  The signal out of the BlueRay channel is at one point a digital bit stream that would be trivial to interface to any computer.  There is no difference other than time differences in technology and that in the BluRay case the digital bit stream is not exposed - it is there and is just a pair of wires!
 * I'm pretty sure Shannon would not understand 0.61 bit. I do agree with you that at the drive interface it is not possible to distinguish one bit from another, but that is only true in the absence of format information.  IBM tells us their format includes 6 data bits and elsewhere they tell us the 6 data bits map to 48 states leaving 16 undefined states.  The fact that states are undefined does not mean they are not available and therefore the information content remains 6 bits.  There is probably some information theory law of conservation that states something like the information content of a state space is that minimum number of bits whose number of states exceed the number of valid states in the state space.  That's how channel encoding works, regardless of whether it is a disk recording channel or a communications channel.  Tom94022 (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The information content of a state space is not the minimum number of bits whose number of states exceed the number of valid states in the state space. Shannon defines it as the base-2 logarithm of the number of valid states in the state space. (Log2(48) = 5.58496250072... so it's 5.58 bits per IBM 305 character, not 5.61, my bad). In the case of the IBM 650, each decimal digit is log2(10)=3.321928... bits. I'll let Shannon speak for himself. He explains measuring information as a fractional number of bits at the bottom of page 1 of http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf --agr (talk) 12:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * My bad too. Thanks for the lesson on information theory (error admitted above).  I won't bother to read the Shannon since IBM put no constraint on the use of the 6 data bits at the interface to the 350 the information content of the 350 is 30 million unconstrained bits = 3.75 MB.  If IBM sold the 350 to an OEM, he/she using the 350 in accordance with IBMs implicit specifications would have unconstrained use of the 6 data bits/character available at the interface. The fact that IBM then constrained a character's use in the 305 could be interpreted to mean the 350 as used by IBM on the 305 was only a 3.49 MB drive (on an information theory basis).  Note the parenthesis - IBM never said this so it is qualified for understanding! This is very interesting original research, not usable in Wikipedia, but further indication of the obvious factual inaccuracy of any number other than 3.75.  The same analysis applied to the 355 gives an IT capacity of 2.49 MB, not 3 MB on a 4 bit/digit basis (the minimum practical number of bits/digit) nor 5.25 MB (7 channel bits/digit).  Again note how each capacity value is qualified.  To paraphrase Voltaire's purported statement, we need to define our terms to have a meaningful conversation.  If you would publish this research in a reliable source then I would be happy to add it as footnotes to the 305 and 650 articles where the constraint applied.
 * BTW, since as I understand it fractional bits do not exist maybe it is some sort of information entropy requirement that the number of bits necessary and sufficient to define a state space of M states is the smallest n where M <= 2n. but maybe not :-). That's the way an engineer would do it but maybe a scientist could figure out a way to use the unused states :-).
 * Thanks, this has been very useful in helping me clearly understand why 3.75 is the only usable value in Wikipedia which I will shortly explain on the HDD Talk page, so before replying here, please give me time to boil it down there. And I withdraw the CD-ROM question :=)! Tom94022 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=623642186 your edit] to Loretta A. Preska may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Paramount Pictures Corp, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, February 19, 1998

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=625074588 your edit] to Plugboard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Other plugboards controlled card reading and punching, the printer and the console typewriter.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=626474380 your edit] to New York New Jersey Rail, LLC may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Board Approves Major Redevelopment Of Greenville Yard To Improve Cargo Movement In The Port, Port Authority Press Release Number 190-2014, Sep 17, 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=626801727 your edit] to Lunar Orbiter Image Recovery Project may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * are undergoing digital processing before being submitted to NASA's Planetary Data System.

October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=631901140 your edit] to Shelter-half may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * English]] pup-tent), is a simple kind of tent designed to provide temporary shelter and/or concealment. Two sheets of canvas or a similar material (the halves) are fastened together

copyright
Hello, one of the pictures that you took (punch-card) had a satisfiable level of quality that I would be so glad to share it inside my book. Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punched_card#mediaviewer/File:IBM1130CopyCard.agr.jpg If there is any copyright issues then you can inform me during next few days. Thanks again for your work, Lt. Ghasemi 88.226.93.94 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salsa20, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Boston bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics
 * added links pointing to Rugby and Media Center


 * Widett Circle
 * added a link pointing to Massachusetts Avenue

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Astromony, Star Wars, and naming
Maybe you need to start picking names that can be remembered better by readers. The name J1040n sounds random. As a new user I boldly renamed it but it's likely to be disputed so I am letting you know if the rename is undone I wouldn't mind. Slimer5Buster (talk) 12:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for pitching in and, yes, I've undone your creative name change. While Wikipedia is a place where anyone can edit, we have lots of rules, especially about article titles. See eg NCASTRO. And though bold is good, when a talk discussion is under way it's better to participate and wait for a consensus to emerge.--agr (talk) 13:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghosting (television), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attenuator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Mechanical counter listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mechanical counter. Since you had some involvement with the Mechanical counter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (talk) 18:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I initiated a discussion to split the mechanical counter section to have its own article from the current redirect target of Counter (digital). Since you seem to be knowledgeable about this topic, perhaps, you may share your thought to other editors there. Z22 (talk) 01:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of AirTrain LaGuardia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AirTrain LaGuardia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AirTrain LaGuardia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Dream out loud (talk) 20:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Reverting at Square root of 2
Meanwhile I've been haunted by STiki for making your explanatory statement on the notability of this derived constant available to the public. I admit that I consider this given reason to revert me the first time as a mockery, and that my reaction to this might possibly be inappropriate. I am however still convinced, that $$1/\sqrt{2}$$ is in no way noteable, and should be removed again, but I am also certainly not sufficiently engaged to start an edit war on this.

I just really do not want to be seen near vandalizing. Purgy (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * As I pointed out at Talk:Square root of 2 I found the reference refuting my claim after I made the edit. No mocking was intended. You have a reasonable argument, my judgement differs, but I respect your position and your efforts to improve Wikipedia.--agr (talk) 03:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Cordial thanks for your kind words. Here's to a better Wikipedia! ;) Purgy (talk) 08:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Radar imaging
An article that you have been involved in editing, Radar imaging, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 12:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm&
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm&, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/13-1314/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * US Supreme Court Rulings are public domain and it is credited in the references and edit summary.--agr (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LaGuardia Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mets – Willets Point. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The page is no longer a disambiguation page.--agr (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Weak interaction in the sun.
Beta decay is via the weak interaction, and that has to happen in some of the steps in the sun. That is, whenever there is a proton <--> neutron transmutation. The fusion reactions such as D+D and D+T normally don't involve beta decay. Gah4 (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification.--agr (talk) 17:10, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aaron Nusbaum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Sears. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * fixed--agr (talk) 15:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Hard Left
Hi, I'd like you to take a look at this article. Here its stated that "The 'hard left' is a pejorative used by conservative elements in the media". However this statement is not properly backed up. There are two sources to support it: one is a rather obscure book which doesn't appear to be a reliable source, the other is http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6637987/Jeremy-Corbyn-appoints-left-wingers-to-his-first-Shadow-Cabinet.html?CMP=spklr-_-Editorial-_-TWITTER-_-TheSunNewspaper-_-20150914-_-Politics-_-235200826, which states absolutely noting about the term hard left and simply uses it to describe several politicians. Presumably whoever placed it in the article has decided that it somehow proves that the term 'hard left' is a perforative used by the conservative media. This would of course breach WP:NOR.

Thanks

--Reaganomics88 (talk) 18:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I've responded on the article talk page.--agr (talk) 15:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * NSA product types
 * added links pointing to Skipjack and DES


 * Key size
 * added a link pointing to Skipjack

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

scrypt edit re: yescrypt
Thanks for your clarification re: the yescrypt paragraph on the scrypt page. I had missed the explanation that it's an easy upgrade path on the first read.

Do you think it would be a good idea to change, say, the section title to something that highlights the relevance to scrypt of the section? Maybe something like "Upgrading to other password hashing schemes"?

DutchCanadian (talk) 22:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm open to a different section head, but maybe focus on the Password Hashing Competition. The point being that there was an effort to develop something better and one of the finalist that got special mention was designed to be an easy upgrade from scrypt.--agr (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * PS: In the future, please create a discussion on the talk page of the relevant article, so other interested people can also express their opinion. You can use Ping template to notify users of the discussion. -- intgr [talk] 15:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Crypto Wars page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=707014473 your edit] caused an unsupported parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F707014473%7CCrypto Wars%5D%5D Ask for help])

FBI v. Apple has been nominated for Did You Know
Hello, ArnoldReinhold,

The above nomination of an article on which you were a primary editor has been reviewed. It has minor problems, which the nominator may have problems fixing. If you should be able to aid that editor if needed, it may help speed this time-sensitive nomination along.

I might add, from my background as a military intelligence analyst, I greatly admire your celerity in compiling this article.

Georgejdorner (talk) 22:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, as mentioned on the nomination page, I copied a big chunk of this article from a section on the case in the article 2015 San Bernardino attack, after a discussion on that article's talk page, so the team there deserves much of the credit.--agr (talk) 01:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=709150684 your edit] to Edward Charles Pickering may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * a-team-of-19th-century-women-mapped-the-cosmos/ The 19th century women who catalogued the cosmos, Michelle Starr, Cnet News, March 7, 2016  Leavitt's discovery of the period-luminosity
 * Fixed--agr (talk) 16:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for FBI–Apple encryption dispute
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 12:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited U.S. Savings bonds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Morgenthau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed--agr (talk) 11:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fredkin gate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qbit. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=717583964 your edit] to Initial and terminal objects may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nome (mathematics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed--agr (talk) 14:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Neutral notice
As an editor recently involved at Woody Allen, you may wish to be aware of a comment posted at User talk:ShadowRFK. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Weiner (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Stewart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Formatting references
When you add a reference to an article, please take the time to fully format the reference using cite web, cite news, or a similar citation template. Just adding the bare url causes two problems. For one, it is not always clear to readers what the source actually is until they click the link; even if the site is clear from the url, other important information like the publication date is not shown. Secondly, Link rot is a big problem on Wikipedia; if the source is deleted or moved from the given url, then the citation is effectively dead unless it was archived by archive.org or another web crawler (and even then, already having the template makes moving to an archived version a lot easier). I know that formatting sources makes editing a little slower, but otherwise another editor has to take their time to fill in the citation instead. If you need any help with this, feel free to ask me! Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trammel of Archimedes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mechanism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

RfC: Protect user pages by default
A request for comment is available on protecting user pages by default from edits by anonymous and new users. I am notifying you because you commented on this proposal when it was either in idea or draft form. Funcrunch (talk) 18:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Punched Card - Needs your assistance
(1) The article begins (likely written by you) very nicely with "A punched card or punch card is a piece of stiff paper that can be used to contain digital information represented by the presence or absence of holes in predefined positions"

A recent addition to the article is "In 1881 Jules Carpentier developed a method of recording and playing back performances on a harmonium using punched cards. The system was called the Mélographe Répétiteur and “writes down ordinary music played on the keyboard dans la langage de Jacquard”,[9] that is as holes punched in a series of cards. By 1887 Carpentier had separated the mechanism into the Melograph which recorded the player's key presses and the Melotrope which played the music"

Recording music fails both the "digital" and "predefined positions" specifications, but (some) modern Wikipedians .... I don't want an edit war, hopping you can find a better result.

(2) My apologies for deleting your recent addition to Punched Card. My intent is to restore it in revised sections for "Hollerith Card" and "IBM card" based on Mackenzie's book.

Thanks, 67.160.196.6 (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your note. I'm inclined to let it be. The position of note punches are presumably predetermined on the horizontal axis and the presence or absence of a note is digital even if duration is not. These are early examples and in no way detract from what Hollerith accomplished. I think inclusion benefits our readers on the whole. As for my paragraph, I think it belongs as it is well sourced. If you have a source with a materially different account, that can be worked in.--agr (talk) 18:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey
Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Punchcarddeck.jpg
Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as own, amending the information added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add  to the Media by uploader or Presumed self tag(s) if  present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the information where appropriate).

IF you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created [ here].

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

On this day, 10 years ago...

 * Thanks!--agr (talk) 12:43, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IEEE P1363


The article IEEE P1363 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "notability not established"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 13:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
I noticed that you have edited Vagina in the past. This article is being reviewed for GA status. The talk page contains numerous discussions about content and referencing. Most of the discussions are between two editors (me and another) and consensus can be difficult to establish. Any input you feel would be helpful is greatly appreciated. A third opinion is always helpful and more objective. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉  10:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of scientific demonstrations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SU2 and SO3 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_scientific_demonstrations check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_scientific_demonstrations?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Fixed.--agr (talk) 15:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi
Hello Arnold, you said that you are active in internet since 1983, internet already existed in 1983? yes i know, internet since 1969, internet is very old, internet already existed since 1969, my name is Cauõ. 177.75.67.166 (talk) 20:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Cauõ. Yes, I was active in 1983. If you do a search on Google Groups for my name and 1983, you'll see a few posting I made to Usenet that year. I was working for a company called Automatix, and we had purchased a Digital Equipment VAX 780 computer for software development. We ran Berkley Unix (BSD) on it and some of our staff hooked it up the Arpanet via UUCP. That may have happened as early as the previous year.  Here is a copy of my first usenet posting. Note that we used bang path addressing then. Our computer was named "vaxine".

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site vaxine.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!agr From: agr@vaxine.UUCP (Arnold Reinhold) Newsgroups: net.micro.68k Subject: Info wanted on 68k FORTH Message-ID: <274@vaxine.UUCP> Date: Mon, 1-Aug-83 10:34:19 EDT Article-I.D.: vaxine.274 Posted: Mon Aug 1 10:34:19 1983 Date-Received: Mon, 1-Aug-83 19:15:24 EDT Organization: Automatix Inc., Billerica, MA Lines: 10

I am looking for information on FORTH interpreters for the 68000. Information on available software, which interpreters support the 32 bit address space, user experiences and gurus are of particular interest. Any leads would be welcome.

Arnold Reinhold Automatix Inc. 1000 Tech Park Dr.	Billerica, Ma 01821
 * --agr (talk) 01:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lsjbot


The article Lsjbot has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No significant coverage in reliable sources.Three-four short news articles do not make encyclopedic notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Jewish wimples in commons
Hi,

You creates commons:Category:Jewish wimples in 2015. Is it identical in principle to earlier commons:Category:Mappa (ignore images if maps catalogued there by mistake)? If so, could you coordinate a merger? Thanks, DGtal (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If these are merged, I suggest that Jewish wimples be the category name, to avoid the accidental categorization by Italian speakers that DGtal noted. I can perform the category merger if needed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me.--agr (talk) 11:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds perfect. DGtal (talk) 13:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

SLT manufacturing process
Hi Arnold

Did u by chance contribute this image to WikiMedia? If so I am interested in the caption particularly the phrase "discrete transistors" - are these your own words or did you restate something posted at the Computer History Musuem? I did search the museum online and found the images but not the text. The reason I ask is that there is an ongoing discussion as to whether early S/360 usage of discrete transistors in SLT modules makes them second generation (transistor) computers. Tom94022 (talk) 00:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Tom. Yes, that's my photo. The phrase "discrete transistors" is probably mine. If you click on the "Description" button in the "images" link you provided, you will get the following description:

"In System/360, SLT modules replaced discrete-transistor circuits. They were “hybrid,” not integrated circuits — separate transistors and diodes combined with printed resistors on a ½” square ceramic substrate. Complex to manufacture, they were faster and used less power than discrete-transistor circuits."


 * That is exactly the description on display at CHM when I took the picture and it appears in the un-cropped version of the picture, which I did not upload for copyright concerns. Another good reference is the IBM 360 announcement: http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/mainframe/mainframe_PR360.html and this references from our Solid Logic Technology article Logic Blocks Automated Logic Diagrams SLT, SLD, ASLT, MST. page 1-7 (pdf page 15) ff. which describes several generations of IBM circuitry, SLT,  SLD, ASLT, and MST (Monolithic System Technology).  Only the last is what we would now call integrated circuits.


 * The computer generation question is tricky. The transistors used in SLT were individually packaged and added to the hybrid substrate in the last step prior to encapsulation. They are quite visible in my image and even more so in the CHM image. In terms of circuit density, SLT is much closer to early IC technology that it is to the older IBM Standard Modular System (SMS) cards used in the second-generation IBM 7000/1400 series computers. The SLT modules were half-inch squares, or 0.25 sq-in. A 14-pin DIP has a footprint of about 0.27 sq-in, almost identical. IBM could get a at least 6 transistors in a module in their early SLTs and more than twice as many in ASLT. Early SSI TTL ICs had maybe 20 transistors. By contrast SMS cards were 11.25 sq-in and held about as many transistors as an early SLT module. I remember hearing the term two and a half generation for the 360. In terms of architecture, the 360 is clearly 3rd generation, with a unified instruction set, byte addressing, eight-bit bytes, wide addressing, twos-complement arithmetic all features that marked a radical shift from the second generation and which persist to this day. Which is more important, circuit packaging or architecture? The distinction between machine architecture and the details of its implementation were grasped by Ada Lovelace in 1842:

"We refer the reader to the ‘Edinburgh Review’ of July 1834, for a very able account of the Difference Engine. The writer of the article we allude to has selected as his prominent matter for exposition, a wholly different view of the subject from that which M. Menabrea has chosen. The former chiefly treats it under its mechanical aspect, entering but slightly into the mathematical principles of which that engine is the representative, but giving, in considerable length, many details of the mechanism and contrivances by means of which it tabulates the various orders of differences. M. Menabrea, on the contrary, exclusively developes the analytical view; taking it for granted that mechanism is able to perform certain processes, but without attempting to explain how; and devoting his whole attention to explanations and illustrations of the manner in which analytical laws can be so arranged and combined as to bring every branch of that vast subject within the grasp of the assumed powers of mechanism. It is obvious that, in the invention of a calculating engine, these two branches of the subject are equally essential fields of investigation, and that on their mutual adjustment, one to the other, must depend all success. They must be made to meet each other, so that the weak points in the powers of either department may be compensated by the strong points in those of the other. They are indissolubly connected, though so different in their intrinsic nature, that perhaps the same mind might not be likely to prove equally profound or successful in both."


 * Please let me know if I can contribute further to your discussion.--agr (talk) 11:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Arnold:
 * Thanks for the detailed explanation and thanks for the SLT manufacturing image. I agree that from an architecture perspective S/360 is clearly third generation and that the discrete transistors used in the SLT module make it something like a 2$1/2$th generation.  I also agree that archictecture is more important than components and their packaging.  However, the authors who defined the generations, both Bell and Blaauw, arbitrarily chose the components used for the logic circuits of a computer to define either four or five integer generations, mechanical, tube, discrete transistor, monolithic IC (not microprocessor) and microprocessor. Of course the last three all use transistors so we stumble over the meaning of discrete in this discussion. The early S/360s - are they in Generation 2, discrete transistors or in Generation 3, integrated circuits or both.  Personally I prefer both, in 2nd generation with a footnote as to SLT hybrid packaging of discrete transistors and inline in 3rd generation.  It currently is inline in the latter but I am having trouble getting consensus to add it to the 2nd generation list.  Your thoughts would certainly be welcome in the discussion.  Tom94022 (talk) 16:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree the 360 should be listed in List_of_transistorized_computers with a footnote. The same footnote should be on the IBM 1130 which used the same SLT technology and is already there. The list clearly defines its criteria. I would not support listing the 360 in second generation in History_of_computing_hardware_(1960s–present). The current inline text is appropriate and sufficient. If ever a computer marked a generational shift, it's the System 360, no matter how its transistors were packaged. Countess Lovelace would agree.--agr (talk) 02:46, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of crossings of the Charles River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boston Harbor tunnel ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_crossings_of_the_Charles_River check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_crossings_of_the_Charles_River?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That was intended.--agr (talk) 02:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Formatting references
I'm asking once again: please use proper citation templates when adding references, particularly to articles that already use them. It's very frustrating for me to see your edits like this and have to spend my time adding the citation template. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jupiter.SouthStation.agr.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jupiter.SouthStation.agr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Re: Deletion review for Orders of magnitude (voltage)
Hi. I would like to apologize for closing the AfD as redirect because I had done it in haste while closing the other Orders of magnitude AFDs. Also, I would like the other AFD'd Orders of magnitude articles draftified until sufficient sources are found. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 19:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Help on Kilogram edit strategy?
Hi, Arnold. Please comment on the edit strategy for the Kilogram article. I'm trying to plan this on its talk page (Talk:Kilogram). Thanks. -Arch dude (talk) 02:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Krause Patent
Here is a link to the crowdsourced public domain patent I mentioned at Wikipedia Day - https://www.freshpatents.com/-dt20151217ptan20150363899.php Wwwhatsup (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's an interesting idea.--agr (talk) 12:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arlington Yard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double stack ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Arlington_Yard check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Arlington_Yard?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Fixed—agr (talk) 12:32, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Feb 27 WikiWednesday Salon + Mar 2 MoMA Art+Feminism and beyond
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

== March 20: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC + March 23: Asian Art Archive/New York Public Library ==

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

April 17: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC + April 4 and 5: LaGuardia Community College Translatathon 2019
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Greenhill Park
Hi Arnold, I just put a delete request on the redirect from greenhill park to the CPR dock since no links connect to the redirect anymore - just so you know and can check should I have missed something. The links I found I modified to connect to the ship's article directly. Regards, --G-41614 (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I can't seem to find the redirect you are referring to. I did find a disambiguation page Greenhill Park and added the ship there. Can you point me to your deletion request?--agr (talk) 14:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my bad - SS Greenhill Park. I've been pretty much inactive for a couple of years, so I'm rather rusty regarding protocols. --G-41614 (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Ahh. Why not just change the target to Greenhill Park (1943 ship)? That would still be a useful redirect.--agr (talk) 14:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure, though - don't ask me how, but at one point, I was looking at a page that said no links direct here (SS Greenhill Park), so I thought it's no longer needed ...? --G-41614 (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I fixed the redirect and removed the deletion tag. Redirects aren't just for links. They are also for possible search terms a user might try and the general view is that they should be left in place unless they are really bad in some way. See Redirects for discussion. Anyway, welcome back to Wikipedia. Glad you are returning!--agr (talk) 15:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Get that & thnx --G-41614 (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
   

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:21, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

May 22: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Logarithm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mantissa ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Logarithm check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Logarithm?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

June 19: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (stay tuned for Pride on weekend!)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanzam Highway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tanga ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tanzam_Highway check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tanzam_Highway?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 02:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Fixed—108.26.223.140 (talk) 09:50, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Sunday June 23: Wiki Loves Pride @ Metropolitan Museum of Art
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Sunday July 14: Annual NYC Wiki-Picnic @ Roosevelt Island
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simchat Torah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genesis ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Simchat_Torah check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Simchat_Torah?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It's been fixed.--agr (talk) 03:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

August 28: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (+editathons before and after)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Saturday Sept 7: Met Fashion Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Fabyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kane County ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/George_Fabyan check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/George_Fabyan?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:03, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

FYI
Greetings, thanks for commenting. I'm a climate regular. This same debate keeps coming up over and over. Every prior time, we debated the ENTIRE structure of the climate articles in all their nuances. The discussions always become a chaos and the closer can never choose. So THIS time we wanted to try laser focusing on the small thing. There is a policy based reason for making the small change. In Round 2, we expect to open a "Redirects for Discussion" thread to talk about what to do with "Climate change". Many eds want to point it at Global warming. Others want to move Global warming to "climate change". There are at least four other ideas floating around too. We have the best chance of keeping the feet to the fire to get a consensus if we can make the immediate small babystep move now proposed. If that dies, then it is unlikely a sweeping reform package will make everyone happy and we'll be left with the dysfunctional status quo. So that's the idea anyway. Thanks for adding your voice NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I get that your are just trying to get something done, but I don't think the proposed title is helpful to our readers, and it goes against WP:NCDAB advice "rarely, an adjective describing the topic can be used, as in Vector (spatial), but it is usually better to rephrase such a title to avoid parentheses." It should be possible to come up with a meaningful, neutral title for an article about long term changes in Earth's climate. I made one suggestion. It would probably be better to have this discussion at Talk:Climate change.--agr (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * trying to get something done .... that's true, since 2014 in fact. And this step is important in two respects.... #1, that it makes an incremental improvement on the surface and #2 that it breaks the log jam.  I've been at this a long time, and hope you will dive deeper and that will help you realize the significance of #2.  NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 17:04, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Summary table for Renaming Climate change article
THANK YOU for switching from Oppose to Neutral! I would really like to see the article merged to climate system, but I put that on ice for much the same reasons. FYI in my own userspace I have started a table in which I am trying to super-succinctly summarize the Not-Votes and perspectives that have been raised. This table simply reflects my own understanding of everyone's views. The closer may or may not look at it. This is a work in progress, but I have at least finished my initial data-entry for what you've said. If you would like to me change anything, please use the talk page attached the table. Thanks! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!
 Happy Adminship Anniversary! Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! agr (talk) 03:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jupiter.SouthStation.agr.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jupiter.SouthStation.agr.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Jupiter.SouthStation.agr.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jupiter.SouthStation.agr.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:European coupler.agr.jpg


The file File:European coupler.agr.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:FTV1400D.png


The file File:FTV1400D.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Standard Form 312 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Standard Form 312 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Standard Form 312 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Dual mode contact shoe
 I have been trying to find a source, without success. Peter Horn User talk 19:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, here is a 2013 Railroad.net discussion on the dual capability of the M8 third rail shoe:
 * Could M-8 Style 3Rd Rail Shoe Enable Conversion?.
 * Hope this helps.--agr (talk) 21:03, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * } Some of the forum participants appear to have no clue whatsoever. They talk about converting the third rail from one type to the other. That is obviously not the answer. The question would be, can this shoe be used, in turn on either the underrunning third rail type or on the overrunning third rail type. No need to do this "on the fly", except for providing a short stretch without third rail. To me it appears that the shoe is set for underrunning type and that while engaging to the overrunning type third rail the shoe is pushed up. Peter Horn User talk 03:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It is also shown in the retracted position, eg in the position while the unit is running outside of third rail territory. That all said, one has to contact Kawasaki or / and Metro North to get the technical details. Peter Horn User talk 15:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The Railroad.net thread was indeed started by someone making the suggestion that the dual-mode shoes could be used to convert the third rail from one type to the other. As you say, that is the wrong question. But the bigger question was answered by user "Clean Cab" as follows:
 * "The M8 3rd rail shoe is capable of using either under running and over running 3rd rail without any action by the engineer. The shoe itself has a set of springs in the mechanism that keep a double sided shoe at a neutral center position. It automatically adjust[s] to either style of 3rd rail in encounters. The original plans did call for an air powered device to raise/lower the shoe that the engineer would control by using a switch in the cab, but that proved to be a maintainance nightmare. A German engineering firm called Schunk was contracted to address the problem and developed the center sprung mechanism using special double sided shoes, and it has worked well so far in tests, but I am unaware of them being used in any real world test between the two different styles of 3rd rail because the M8s have only operated on MN territory so far."


 * I also looked up Schunk engineering and their website confirms that their shoe is capable of both under and over running. (That link is probably a better source.) The capability might actually be used in the long-delayed but forthcoming Penn Station Access project, particularly for the Hudson Line to Penn station option.--agr (talk) 19:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * } Thanks for the website It is the needed proof. No reputable company will make false claims about their product(s). Peter Horn User talk 01:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Space colonization
Template:Space colonization has been nominated for merging with Template:Space Colonization. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!
 Happy Adminship Anniversary! Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lsjbot


The article Lsjbot has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not notable; article would be long since deleted if not about a Wikipedia/Meta topic"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice. I have contested the deletion and noted my reasons on the article's talk page.--agr (talk) 02:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

poincaré conjecture
Hello, I would like to discuss about recent modifications made on the page "poincaré conjecture", it is my understanding that this problem belongs to algebraic topology since geometric topology treats subjects that don't have to use homeomorphisms, and I also have a source confirming that https://www.britannica.com/science/Poincare-conjecture thanks for your attention ! (p.s. excuse me if I shouldn't talk here, I just created a wiki account)
 * Hi Max, Please add a section to Talk:Poincaré conjecture summarizing your explanation for preferring algebraic topology as the topic field, with your source. I won't object further to the change you propose, though others might in which case some discussion will hopefully reach a consensus. Also please add "- - ~ ~ ~ ~" (two hyphens and four tildes, without the quotes or intervening spaces) to the end of all your talk page comments, as that character string automatically incorporates your signature. Welcome to Wikipedia and if you run into other difficulties editing here feel free to contact me for help.--agr (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! :) - - ~ ~ ~ ~

Thank you ...
... for what you said for Yoninah! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2580 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to be of service. Thank you.--agr (talk) 23:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Final approval of my edits done to Sen (Surname) article
Hello Sir. My name is Anirban Kolkata. In real life, I am a Lawyer by profession, but I am a Wikipedian by writing hobby. I am currently a Autoconfirmed user, and I have done certain edits to Sen(surname) article, which I think is totally ok, as I have given references. I will also make certain changes in the future based on proper proof. Please make sure that my work is not treated as vandalism, and so that my work gets final approval and is accepted as Wikipedia fact. Right now, I am 31 years old and I live in Kolkata. Take Care Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 20:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. I looked at Sen (surname) and I see that your recent edits have not been removed. There is no guarantee that someone else won't make further edits in the future. I notice that you have deleted the first full paragraph, which had some references. I know nothing about this subject, but that would seem to require some explanation. It would help if you would explain your recent changes on Talk:Sen (surname), preferably citing the references you mention. Please let me know if I can be of further help.--agr (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Arnold Sir. I have posted in detail, in Talk page of Sen(surname) article, the whole reason of my edits. You were totally right, an user called Ekdalian has again changed what I had edited. Please go through what I have posted and you will understand the truth. May God Bless You ! Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Arnold Sir, I have one more request for you. After my truth about this article is accepted by Wikipedia, please give this article "FULLY PROTECTED" status. Otherwise it will be vandalised all the time. Anirban KolkataAnirban Kolkata (talk) 20:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Arnold Sir, user Ekdalian, as far as I understood after researching Wikipedia, is an administrator. But he has got a controversial history of writing and supporting false statements regarding Hindu castes. He is a Bengali and from my city, Kolkata(formerly Calcutta). Please check his history. He is destroying the real facts of Bengali Hindu Brahmanism. Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 22:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * : I have no expertise in this area. Please see Dispute resolution for guidance on how to deal with conflicts like this.—agr (talk) 01:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Arnold Sir. I understand that you don't have any expertise about Indian caste system. I wrote the details just to inform you about the whole historical issue. I request you, as an administrator to ensure that the principles of Wikipedia are followed in the Sen(surname) article. As far as I know, the basic principle of Wikipedia is to establish the real truth. That is what I am trying to do. I hope the technical rules of Wikipedia ensure this basic principle of Wikipedia. Dear user Ekdalian always uses the excuse of Wikipedia rules in order to suppress the truth. My only request to you Arnold Sir is to make sure that the basic principle of Wikipedia is followed in this article. The links I provided as proof should be reliable enough, as it includes important Indian religious websites and also Nobel prize website. I will follow what you advised, but I request you to be involved in the Dispute Resolution process to make sure that the basic principle of Wikipedia is followed. Sir, me and my Dad are right now Corona positive, and my Dad is also a Brain stroke patient. Still I am seriously working towards establishing the truth. I hope my writings have at least given you a glimpse of the issue. Stay safe. Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 18:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Arnold Sir, I will start working in the Dispute Resolution process regarding this article from 23rd Apr 2021, Kolkata Date. I hope you will be present to properly resolve the dispute, and establish the real truth. Thanks for all your support. Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 18:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello Arnold Sir, sorry I could not start the Dispute Resolution work from 23rd April as promised. Me and my Dad have recovered from Corona few days back, and have got Doctor Fit certificate. During our quarantine period, my modem got out-of-order, and I have got a new router only few days back. I will start the DR process from 1st June,2021. Hope you are keeping well. Regards. Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 18:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear Arnold Sir, How are you? I will be engaged in certain professional work in the first 2 weeks of June,2021. I will start the Dispute Resolution process of the Bengali Sen(surname) Article from 17th June,2021. I hope with the Blessings of Kashi Vishwanath, the primary Shiva Deity of Kashi (Benaras) the holiest city in Hinduism, I will be able to establish the truth of Bengali Sen surname in Wikipedia. Take Care. Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 12:07, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Arnold Sir, Hope You are keeping well by the Mercy of God. Sir, I am currently suffering from Post-Covid symptoms and am not well healthwise. I will start working in the Dispute Resolution work of the Bengali Sen surname page as soon as I recover. After I begin the Dispute Resolution process, I will intimate you through a new Post here. Take Care Sir. Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 17:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! agr (talk) 15:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Pinewoods photos
Hi Arnold—thanks for uploading the Pinewoods photos! I'd love to expand Pinewoods Camp someday. Also, depending on which session you attended, you may be interested in efforts to improve contra dance, which needs a lot of help. I'm also hoping to launch/DYK Draft:Money Musk sometime, but I need to obtain a copy of the Cracking Chestnuts book first to fill out the history section and affirm notability. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 00:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, I usually attend the Folk Arts Center week in June, and sometimes Labor Day. But I have done a lot of Contras. For a long time there was a popular weekly dance at the VFW in Cambridge and I lived next door. Most of the callers mentioned in the article called there at some point. I made one edit and I'm inclined to add Tony Saletan to the caller list since he already has an article. He just turned 90. Are there things in particular you need help with? I found Cracking Chestnuts on sale at the CDSS store: --agr (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Good find with Saletan! I added him to the category. For Cracking Chestnuts, I'm not ready to spend $20 just to be able to write the article's history section, so I'm hoping I'll be able to find the book through my library or somewhere else at some point. Dugan Murphy contributed a great video for it, which I'd be excited to see appear on the Main Page. Cheers, &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 20:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!
 '''Wishing ArnoldReinhold a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! CAPTAIN RAJU''' (T) 15:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reminder.--agr (talk) 16:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for all your work — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.167.109.7 (talk) 19:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of AN/ARC-182 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AN/ARC-182 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AN/ARC-182 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AN/CYZ-9


The article AN/CYZ-9 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Billets Mauves €500 10:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yosef Abramowitz have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Using an Amazon ref.   scope_creep Talk  21:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KOI-18


The article KOI-18 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * AN/CYZ-10

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KSV-21


The article KSV-21 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG. Sources are all primary."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Billets Mauves €500 08:52, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KOV-21


The article KOV-21 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Billets Mauves €500 08:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KY-3


The article KY-3 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE search doesn't bring any sources that help establish notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Billets Mauves €500 09:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of U-229


The article U-229 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Felsenthal CPU-73 A/P Air Navigation Attack Computer


The article Felsenthal CPU-73 A/P Air Navigation Attack Computer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG. Sources are either primary, or passing mentions from questionable sources. A WP:BEFORE search does not bring anything more than this."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Billets Mauves €500 17:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

AI editing
Selfstudier (talk) 17:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Dershowitz
You are in breach of 1R, kindly self revert. Thank you.Selfstudier (talk) 16:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I have done as you requested, but I believe your edit violates WP:BLP. Please explain on the article talk page.--agr (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy Fifteenth Adminship Anniversary!
 Wishing ArnoldReinhold a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman ( talk ) 17:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you!

File:FTV1400D.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FTV1400D.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 05:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of longitude, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meridian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Panama Canal locks
Hello. Please do not restore material that has been moved to the talk page or otherwise removed, without accompanying it with citations required by WP:V/WP:NOR/WP:PSTS/WP:IRS/WP:CS, et al, as you did with these edits to Panama Canal locks, in particular this one, in which you claimed you were "restoring an eviscerated article." Since you've accumulated over 30,000 edits 2004, I assume you know by now that with some exception, adding material to Wikipedia without citations is not permitted. That material was fact-tagged, and eventually moved to the talk page, for a reason. If you want to restore the material that was moved to the talk page, then please add citations to it when you do so. This practice was upheld by admins and other editors in an extended discussion last August/September, in particular NinjaRobotPirate, who closed that discussion, who said of the policies that require citations, "Further relitigation of the same points is unlikely to be helpful, and the relevant policies have been repeatedly explained." You can consult with him if you wish. I didn't revert your revert at the time, because I noticed that you did add some citations to that text, and thought I would give you an opportunity to add cites to the rest, which was part of the compromise I agreed to during that discussion. Nightscream (talk) 19:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I've added footnotes to each paragraph. Please move further discussion to the article talk page.--agr (talk) 19:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Merging content to NSA encryption systems
Dear Arnold,

I am currently trying to work on the backlog of articles to be merged after an Articles for deletion discussion. At Articles for deletion/AN/CYZ-9, you mentioned that you have a plan for the content of the article under discussion there and the content of some further similar articles.

Since you clearly have vastly more expertise on this topic than I do, would you still be available to assist with the merger? Felix QW (talk) 19:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi . I've done the merger. Is there any bookkeeping needed?--agr (talk) 21:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! I tidied up the redirect, a bot will do the rest. Have a good week! Felix QW (talk) 09:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Please use normal wikilinks in edit summaries
Note that external links "don't work" in edit summaries. Please use internal-style wikilinks instead, so people can easily follow such links from the page history or a "diff". (To be more specific, instead of something like "create per RfD discussion at", which you used when creating Mathematics and statistics, please use "create per RfD discussion at Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 20".) Interwiki links also work in edit summaries, so you can, say, link to Meta or to a different language wiki without using an external link. - dcljr (talk) 01:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Got it. Thanks.--agr (talk) 12:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Mathematics and statistics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mathematics and statistics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mathematics and statistics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 22:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Tinfoil Hat Linux for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tinfoil Hat Linux, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Tinfoil Hat Linux (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)