User talk:Arnuvtandon

February 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Spiking neural network, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  16:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Generative adversarial network. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  16:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of PetCode for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PetCode is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PetCode until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 01:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PetCode


A tag has been placed on PetCode, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PetCode. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. YODADICAE👽 17:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at PetCode. YODADICAE👽 18:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Since you're ignoring everything, let me be clear. If you continue trying to spam your company here and socking while doing so, you're going to wind up indefinitely blocked. YODADICAE👽  18:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Block notice
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Arnuvtandon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Please do not recruit friends or coworkers to influence decisions on Wikipedia. Additionally, because of your external relationship to PetCode, you have a conflict of interest with respect to that topic—please take this time to read our conflict of interest guideline for additional information about how to manage this conflict of interest. Mz7 (talk) 21:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Rename from "Arnuvtandon" to "Penpencileraser14"
Rename from "Arnuvtandon" to "Penpencileraser14" not done per request -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 18:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)