User talk:Arogi Ho

Good ASCAII of you're winner!
That was incredible.68.39.16.243 (talk) 00:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC) (Dacheatcode)

Speedy deletion of The Falling Frog
A tag has been placed on The Falling Frog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.  Acroterion  (talk)  17:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Y4kk 19:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. eaolson 01:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mcgradyming
A tag has been placed on Mcgradyming requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FadedSoul (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

RIAA
This is vandalism. You seem to have a problem with vandalism. Stop. Remember that our articles should be verifiable and written from a neutral point of view. See WP:V and WP:NPOV. Cool Hand Luke 17:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your edits on Shadow of the Day
I re-linked Given Up because it does have an article. Please check these things before making edits. Thank you. Tim meh  !  18:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My bad. Arogi Ho (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Smosh
Please review the rules outlined in Attribution. `'Míkka>t 20:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Smosh
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Smosh. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Smosh (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC)