User talk:Aronsonhd19972021

Welcome!
Hello, Aronsonhd19972021, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review for Farmington Gabbro
You need to put "Farmington Gabbro" in bold in your introductory paragraph when you first mention it. You also put two locations for where it is. I know that it's within two complexes, so maybe you could create a location section explaining that in more detail. Maybe just say western NC in the intro part to keep it brief. For your thin sections, you need to put a scalebar in the image. Talk to Dr. Carmichael and she'll give you a scalebar that you can edit onto these. I would also suggest adding a description of what each thin section is showing in the captions. For your regional map, you note that the complex is shown in red on the zoomed in map. However, it's red on both maps, so you could just say that it's shown in red. There's some weird punctuation in the mineral differences section. You describe the alternate type of rock as: "a olivine, pyroxene, hornblende gabbronites." I would suggest: "an olivine, pyroxene, hornblende gabbronite." Another grammatical error is: "there is outcrops" in the outcrop section. I would suggest changing it to "there are outcrops." You should probably move the bulk rock chemistry table to the petrology/mineralogy section, if it details the whole pluton, instead of the alternate minerals. If it does, make note of it. While your citations seem fine, citations one, two, four, and five are all locked behind paywalls. At least for the links you've provided. There really isn't that much here. I know that there is next to no info on the outcrop, but try and find some more if you can. This unit honestly sucks, but you've got this.Marguliesgm (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Calc-alkaline magma series. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)