User talk:Arontrice

August 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two days for evading the block placed on 82.208.100.59 and edit warring, as you did at Battalions of territorial defense in Ukraine. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC) .

Discretionary sanctions notification
Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:36, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Reply to your email
The reason you are blocked is because you evaded the block placed on 82.208.100.59. The reason that IP address originally blocked is primarily because the edits were not neutral nor fully supported by reliable sources. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the answer. Firstly, I do not question last block reason. The article before my contributions was heavily biased towards one point of view. That included, but not limited to the using or implying the occupation and/or invasion as a fact. That is, the article before my corrections already was not neutral nor fully supported by reliable sources. Almost all sources of the article are links to the media controlled by one side of conflict, thus can not be regarded as fully reliable. As opposed, I have provided a true neutral source and a link to the detailed research. Please specify the concrete criteria of NPOV or RS my edits do not meet, exactly. NPOV and RS are the only goals of my edits. I intend to continue the clearing of the article from all non-NPOV, non backed by RS stuff.
 * Unless there a number of reliable sources which use the following they will generally be considered not neutral "anti-nationalist" "rebellion", no source for the paragraph "From the beginning of the rebellion ... quickly lost control of the border" is unsourced, I can't see a neutral reason to give details on Andriy Biletsky's past and given it's unsourced it is a blatant WP:BLP violation. Those are some examples on a quick look, you also changed the spelling of at least two words to an correct spelling. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I absolutely understand that some of my edits are subjects to correction, but not to the reverting of all edits. Please check that original of paragraph "From the beginning of the rebellion ... quickly lost control of the border" is unsourced IN FIRST PLACE, so this argument is invalid. As for this Andriy Biletsky's ex-con past, it is intentionally omitted from the article. It is confirmed by both sides, and the dude himself in his interview. Easily backed with sources. Info is directly related to the origin of battalion's head and core. There is no reason to hide it. I believe the omitting such information is a whitewashing of armed thugs they are. Not all battalions have such background, of course. The only reason behind arguable WP:BLP violation here is the reverting of all edits by vandals. Most important - I was unable to fix my edits or add a reference or merge corrected spelling. Due to constant pointless reverting of all my edits. Check their activities from my first edit, would you? Vandals are not blocked even. Please advise, how can I avoid my future work on the article from being disrupted in such a manner. Also note that you failed to apply WP:3RR to all parties.