User talk:Arqum.beg

Welcome!
Hello, Arqum.beg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=580709159 your edit] to Sikhism may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * to fight the Mughal rulers of India. Stake|year=2007|publisher=iUniverse|isbn=9780595875634|page=67 and those who had committed atrocities against Pir Buddhu Shah.  Banda Singh advanced
 * words, thus making Gurmukhi language which then constitute two components – spoken Gurmukhi words in form of Gurbani which originated from different languages (like world's different languages have
 * Fixed. Apuldram (talk) 12:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Jujhar.pannu. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. S H 14:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Re: Mughal Tyrrant
The term "Mughal Tyrants" seems to breach the rule WP:POV and WP:Balance. Saying that, of the Mughal Rulers, Akhbar was seen as fair and great minded wheras Aurangzeb was seen as a tyrannt even by Muslims. So if a referncce is there that refers to Mughal rule as "tyrannical" a statement like "Mughal Rulers but by some some seen as tyrranical" could be used. That would fulfil WP:Balance. I would state that a WP:Reliable reference should be used to back up any statements. Thanks S H 10:37, 11 November 2013 (UTC)