User talk:Arr4/Archive 5

Paid editing
There should be a list of what articles you have been paid to write and by whom someone on your user page. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 20:52, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

hello
Mr. Rahat Rahim from CUET, you are not doing the right thing by removing every single thing i have added, it's true that he went to casino for playing and took a nap during a match,i have provided the source and there was some strong allegations against him about the match fixing(source added too), please read before you remove anything, having a power doesn't mean you can do whatever you want, and i am giving proper sources as reference, not poor sources, but you are still trying to ignore them. maybe you don't get the time for reading newspapers. or you forgot the WP:NPOV

speedy khaled--Speedy khaled (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Total Environmental Restoration Solutions, Inc.


A tag has been placed on Total Environmental Restoration Solutions, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  SAMI  talk 08:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

hi
I honestly don't know how to upload an image to the side of an article, please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levidecalmer (talk • contribs) 11:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Invitation


Hello, Ctg4Rahat,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and fix these small things, too.

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list •  Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter  •   Translate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Paradiso LMS
Regardless of this being deleted because it looked like a brochure for the product, per COI guidelines you should not be creating articles directly. They should go through WP:AFC for review by editors without a COI. It's commendable for you to be following COI, but you need to follow it to the letter. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * - after a half acknowledgement of paid editing by Ctg4Rahat on one article, Doc James and I ferretted out a slew of articles that Ctg4Rahat had likely done for pay, and he eventually disclosed all of them, and promised to follow the Terms of Use going forward. The whole case is here: Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_81.  The subject article was one of them.  Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 21:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I obviously wasn't aware of that discussion. We'll pretend didn't know about COI for whatever reason, and that they will follow it fully going forward. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 21:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * .... ok. i don't have any means to know if he knowingly or didn't knowingly violate the ToU, nor if he will follow them going forward.  we do the best we can with the tools we have. when i closed the thread at COIN i said other users may view things differently, so if you think some further action is warranted you are free to pursue it, of course.   Jytdog (talk) 21:44, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, they will follow them, or they might be blocked. Ctg4Rahat, you should also under no circumstance remove speedy deletion tags on articles you created, as you did here. COI editing is tricky, because it places you under heightened scrutiny, but the onus is on you to function within its constraints, as well as all other applicable guidelines and policies. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Total Environmental Restoration Solutions, Inc. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Total Environmental Restoration Solutions, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Total Environmental Restoration Solutions, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Robert Clive
I was wondering why you reverted my edits at Robert Clive. My edit was restoring content after a user had blanked the page for no reason, yet your reversion reblanked the page. As you seem like a decent user, am I correct in assuming it was an mistake? Joseph2302 (talk) 19:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the re-revert. I clicked rollback unintentionally. - Rahat (Message) 04:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

This article is heavily one-sided, UNREFERENCED, POV, POV
We better clean up this article, because it is NOT right to write this type of article with such heavily, heavily unreferenced, POV, bias!

Under the section of:

Institution[edit] §Election of 1948[edit] Main article: South African general election, 1948

Daniel François Malan, the first apartheid prime minister (1948–1954) Apartheid is an Afrikaans word which means apartness. Apartheid, developed in the 1930s and 1940s, was similar to the policy of segregation which it replaced. The term apartheid was commonly used in discussions about race and politics by Afrikaner Nationalists who wanted white domination in South Africa.

( THAT'S A POINT OF VIEW - IT'S NOT A FACT! WHERE'S THE NEUTRAL REFERENCES! )

Go back that article that is listed: South African general election, 1948

South African general election, 1948

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_general_election,_1948

Ok it is Nationalists that started apartheid, but be specific! The National Party wanted apartheid. You make it sound: Afrikaner - so was everyone who voted for the National Party Afrikaners? No there were english voters who supported the National Party. So to say it was Afrikaners - to connect those two words without mentioning that the United Party that got 49.18% under Jan Smuts, an Afrikaner!, that they were opposed to apartheid as presented by the National Party, to not mention that, I mean it gives no background as to how it developed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_general_election,_1948

"One of the central issues facing the white electorate in the 1948 election was that of race. The United Party (UP) and the National Party (NP) presented voters with differing answers to questions relating to racial integration in SA. Smuts and his followers were in favour of a pragmatic approach, arguing that racial integration was inevitable and that the government should thus relax regulations which sought to prevent black people from moving into urban areas. Whilst still seeking to maintain white dominance, the UP argued in favour of gradually reforming the political system so that black South Africans could eventually, at some unspecified point in the future, exercise some sort of power in a racially integrated South Africa. In contrast to this seemingly vague ideology, the NP advanced the notion of further strictly enforced segregation between races and the total disempowerment of black South Africans. Rural to urban movement by blacks was to be discouraged."

So lets be clear, you start off, apartheid is an afrikaans word for apartheid. So people get no idea that there was different Afrikaner views to the policies that should have been followed and the rest of the article is so ONE-SIDED! BIAS!

"During the 1930s and 1940s South Africa became a modern industrialised and urbanised nation and apartheid was a reaction by Afrikaners to this rapid change."

( Once again POV - no references! So Jan Smuts was not an Afrikaner! It just Afrikaners that collectively, all 100% "apartheid was a reaction by Afrikaners to this rapid change." That's a POV, not a fact! )

The ideological foundation of apartheid was that the different races in South Africa needed to be separated for their own mutual benefit. The bulk of apartheid thinking was based firmly on the philosophy of "scientific racism".

( That's another POV - I've just proven with speeches by the ARCHITECT OF APARTHEID - HF VERWOERD that he wanted something different.

When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do Sir? Keynes Are you going to persist with POV, POV. BIAS. BIAS. BIAS. LIES. LIES. OUTRIGHT LIGHTS. HATE SPEECH! Because clearly it is not clear to everyone what the election of 1948 was about)

There's not even mention of Communism. All the Southern African states became Marxist states. So was it NOTHING? There was no fears there!? Do you understand how ridicilous you are making Wikipedia?

At least the 1948 article mentions:

"Much was made of the fact that Smuts had developed a good working relationship with Joseph Stalin during World War II, when South Africa and the USSR were allies in the fight against Nazi Germany. Smuts had once remarked that he "doffs his cap to Stalin" and the NP presented this remark as proof of Smuts’s latent Communist tendencies."

"In preparation for the 1948 election, the NP moderated its stance on republicanism. Because of the immense and abiding national trauma caused by the Anglo-Boer War, transforming South Africa into a republic and dissolving all ties between South Africa and the United Kingdom had been an important mission for earlier incarnations of the NP. English speaking South Africans tended to favour a close relationship with the UK, and so the republican project became a source of conflict between the two largest white groups in South Africa. A staunchly pro-republic stance alienated moderate Afrikaners who had supported South Africa's participation in World War II and wished to achieve reconciliation between their own people and English speakers. When the NP agreed to compromise its fiercely republican standpoint, conceding that South Africa should remain a Dominion in the Commonwealth, many Afrikaner UP supporters switched allegiance."

At least people can understand things in a better light! You only mention that apartheid was due to scientific racism! THAT IS POV! There's 100s of reason that were given during the 1948 election as to why apartheid had to come into existence! Do you understand? You are creating a totally unfair and biased article! I will fight you until this exposed! This is a sham of hate speech! Let me edit the British history during some period and call you believers in scientific racism without giving any other reasons for your actions during colonialism! The British were just racist! Do you see how absolutely absurd this is! You link to an article that describes the issues, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_general_election,_1948, yet you allow clear discrimination and bias in the main article!

"Afrikaners held that it was impossible, impracticable and ungodly for the different races and cultures to live as one."

POV - all Afrikaners believed that! OH OK you could read their minds!

Subsequently a policy of separate development would be pursued by the white government. This insistence on racial apartness became the political and legal doctrine of apartheid.

Apartheid
So lets use that article of the 1948 election as a good starting point to give readers insight as to the issues about what choices were before the electorate and were made in 1948 - interesting to note that's Smuts's United Party got 49.5% of the vote, the majority of voters voted for Jan Smuts by 12%+ yet the National Party formed a coalition with another political party to get themselves into government by 0.5% !

So lets just be fair.

So there was other issues, besides racism in the 1948 election!

Are you not going to mention them! Must people click through to another article!

Where can I complain about this article?

can I improve it? Or will you just reject it! Reject it! Reject it!

Where can I complain about this article?


 * Comment: Please discuss these issues at the associated talk page. e.g Talk:South African general election, 1948 - Rahat (Message) 19:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

I will fight you to the end, I will EXPOSE YOU! I will fight you to the end, this is about APARTHEID, why apartheid was instituted in 1948! Look at that date 1948! After an election! It's about apartheid that started in 1948 - that's when the laws were created - after the National Party won the election! We are talking about the INSTITUTION OF APARTHEID! The start of apartheid! It started after the election in 1948! APARTHEID was the OFFICIAL POLICY OF A POLITICAL PARTY. That was the ideas of apartheid that developed in the 1940s to a serious of problems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.7.103.5 (talk) 19:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

So who can I complain to? Mr. Bangladesh?

Are you a professional? Can you write a professional NEUTRAL article?


 * Comment - I am not a professional. I am just a contributor like you. Wikipedia is an open source encyclopedia that anyone can edit. But remember to go through the rules of Wikipedia first. Then create an account in Wikipedia and edit the article you want to edit with Reliable Sources. Edits without reference will be reverted instantly. - Rahat (Message) 19:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Are you going to give me a chance? I mean this article is SO LOADED with left-wing, liberal bias and totally unobjective! I mean it seems to me the liberals and the left have the PASSION to wewrite history, while the rest of us don't care. But will you consider my input or will you just reject, reject it, reject it, reject it, because my POV is not liberal, bias and left-wing?

I'm upset and it is because this article has been allowed to completely represent something which it wasn't: apartheid. Even though it was edited WITH references. There's no objectivity showed by Wikipedia. Perhaps some don't know all the issues. But if this article is the trend in Wikipedia - can you see the future? Absolutely unbalanced Wikipedia. Subverted by socialists and liberals who constantly edit edit edit and give outrageous references! Not facts! Outrageous references to events! So don't take it personally. It's upsetting that no one - can see the clear jump in logic in many articles. And I am not perfect. I'm also offering a POV. But at least I don't censor views as the liberals and socialists now want to do - they want one view. No discussions! No EDITS! And it is really true! The liberal view of past events is acceptable! Often outrageous views on events! I mean you can see from the language in this apartheid article - segregation - a word NEVER used in South Africa. It is a US word. It's often American liberal perspectives. I edited out countless additions in this article where Africans vs. whites. I mean you get Egyptians that are Africans, Tunisians, Moroccans, so to say the Africans vs. the whites. You get white South Africans. They are Africans too. Africans are not reserved for black people! If you are a white South African, you are an African! You have been born in Africa for 350 years! When will you be an African?

So my real anger is directed at Wikipedia that's becoming outrageous! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.7.103.5 (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of "Annie Hill (Runner)"
Please allow this page back up for a few more hours. I created it for someone in my class who scarcely runs a mile slower than 5 minutes. I have read the rules in many places, and my article contains no bias, then it shouldn't be violating that area. Can you please leave the article up for 4 more hours, that should be time for me to show her. It would mean a lot to me. Slabrant (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhesik Vinayak (talk •r contribs) 08:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello ...what can I do for you? - Rahat (Message) 11:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Washiqur Rahman Babu
Hi, given your edits on Avijit Roy, just wanted to say Washiqur Rahman Babu has just been killed (CPJ) and the article is on AFD, and also on ITN.. -- Aronzak (talk) 05:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

WP:ITN/C

I just logged in to check and make 100% sure that I was right about you
“To write history one must be more than a man, since the author who holds the pen of this great justiciary must be free from all preoccupation of interest or vanity.”

― Napoléon Bonaparte

I was right about you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.15.86.128 (talk) 15:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Who are you? - Rahat (Message) 15:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Bengali people#List of people in the collage
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bengali people. Thanks. ~  nafSadh did say 15:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

machine readable passport renewal porpose
Sir,my passport issued on 11 october2010.How can I renewal this passport.please reply me.My mail ID is anjana_p08@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.200.63.184 (talk) 16:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

machine readable passport renewal porpose
Sir,my passport issued on 11 october2010.How can I renewal this passport.please reply me.My mail ID is anjana_p08@yahoo.com 16:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)121.200.63.184 (talk)
 * It is wikipedia, not a passport providing agency or something like that. Contact with passport office please. - Rahat (Message) 01:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Total Environmental Restoration Solutions, Inc.
Have you abandoned this? If so, can I help you get an admin to delete it? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 13:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for letting me know. I have tagged it for deletion. - Rahat (Message) 14:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks! house cleaning :) Jytdog (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

dont edit pakistan related articles
Ctg4Rahat if you want to edit pakistan related articles please add references. I live in Karachi and know a lot about Pakistani things. My writings are not wrong. 15:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by KarachiBiriani (talk • contribs) 12:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

thanks for reverting
thanks for reverting Yahya Khan as i had grammatically mistaken. You should not edit Pakistan related articles unless you know about them correctly.15:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)