User talk:Arri at Suburban Express

COI Notice
I have a Conflict of Interest arising from my ownership interest in Suburban Express Inc.

Suburban Express Conventional Media Sources
Here are some conventional-media sources which are potentially useful for editors working on the Suburban Express article:

Daily Herald


 * 1) Daily Herald Release: http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-release.pdf
 * 2) Daily Herald Article re: Fare Wars http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-fare-wars-toeppen.pdf
 * 3) Daily Herald Article re: University of Iowa Service http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-uiowa-se.pdf

News-Gazette


 * 1) News-Gazette release: http://www.toeppen.com/gazette-release.pdf
 * 2) News-Gazette article re: Go Suburban - leave the driving to the entrepreneur: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1990_0408_news-gazette_article.pdf

Daily Illini


 * 1) Daily Illini release: http://www.toeppen.com/di-release.pdf
 * 2) Daily Illini article re: New cut-rate bus service: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1984_0128_new_cut-rate_bus_service.pdf
 * 3) Daily Illini article re: Illini Union Board budget matters - Greyhound commissions down by $15k (Translates to $150k sales decrease) http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1984_IUB_budget_impact.pdf
 * 4) Daily Illini article re: Greyhound Predatory Pricing: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1985_0216_greyhound_predatory_pricing.pdf
 * 5) Daily Illini article re: Suburban Express using novel method to pursue cheaters: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1996_0117_bad_checks.pdf
 * 6) Daily Illini letter to editor re: Bad checks article: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1996_0118_di_letter_to_editor_re_badcheck_article.pdf
 * 7) Daily Illini article re: Students who thought they could do better... http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/2000_0823_6th_Wave_Opens.pdf
 * 8) Daily Illini article re: ...but who arguably failed: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/2000_1030_Sixth_Wave_Screws_Up.pdf

Perhaps an editor will post these in the Talk section of the Suburban Express article.
 * Thanks, I've reposted this with minor changes. &mdash;  rybec   20:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Personal Attacks, treating Wikipedia as a battleground and general disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MLauba (Talk) 23:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC) During the course of the discussion at WP:ANhere, you have been warned and cautioned multiple times about restricting yourself to factual concerns with specific statements in the article and refraining from discussing and attacking other editors. This warning was repeated at the talk page of User:Arri416.

Despite these, you have continued your campaign of personal attacks, innuendo and intimidation, which would already be unacceptable if your focus was merely on correcting factual inaccuracies (eg., , or ). However, your more recent interventions show a tend to use those tactics to sway and change the tone of the article itself, which combined with bullying and intimidation tactics is simply not going to fly.

Correcting factual mistakes or inaccuracies is a perfectly legitimate endeavour. However, since it appears those cannot come without all the rest, please address those by emailing . Include both the address or title of your article and specific information on the problems you have with it. MLauba (Talk) 23:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)


 * What a drama! --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:13, 6 November 2013 (UTC)