User talk:Arrogant & Intransigent

wassup?

Changing AfDs
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page.

Also, please do not alter Articles for Deletion discussions as you did with Articles for deletion/Juicee News Daily and Articles for deletion/Cindy (dolphin). In both cases, you claimed that the article had been deleted when it hadn't and broke the links to the article by changing the lower case "l" in the article to a capital "I". This could be considered vandalism. It would tend to make people think the deletion debate was over and the article had already been deleted, when in fact the articles Juicee News Daily and Cindy (dolphin) have not been deleted yet. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Agree with the above: I had to reverse your closure of Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music! 29 (U.S. series), as it wasn't appropriate for WP:SNOW at all. In addition, please do not remove good-faith comments on talk pages, such as the one you're removing on User talk:Ryulong. Acalamari 15:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Do NOT remove other's talk page comments as you did here at User:Ryulong. This is vandalism and you can be blocked for this. Prashanthns (talk) 15:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Unblock Request
Please do not deny unblock requests, as there are often factors that are not apparent to users that are unable to view the requesting users deleted contribs. You are more than welcome to comment, but the user denying the request should be a admin. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 16:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * And as a note, please leave xFD closures to administrators. Your speedy closures of several deletions have been overturned and reverted. This issue has been brought up at WP:ANI. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  16:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop
Please stop posing as an admin (which you are not) by claiming to review unblock requests, etc. - I am giving you a Level 4 warning in relation to this

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. DuncanHill (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm going to second this one. While your comments indicate that you are trying to be helpful, posing as an admin (particularly an uncivil one) is extremely disruptive. -- jonny - m  t  16:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)