User talk:Arsc edit

Welcome!

 * }

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Arctic Region Supercomputing Center has been reverted. Your edit here to Arctic Region Supercomputing Center was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed email address removed, email address removed) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information such as email addresses. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert.  However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saju John Mathew


A tag has been placed on Saju John Mathew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tinton5 (talk) 05:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saju John Mathew


A tag has been placed on Saju John Mathew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tinton5 (talk) 05:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Prayer United


A tag has been placed on Prayer United requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Mean as custard (talk) 10:29, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Hey, you're editing enthusiastically
I'm glad to see you leaping in an providing new pages and new content so enthusiastically, and I hope that you'll continue to contribute to Wikipedia for a long time to come. However, as you may note from some of the above messages, in your enthusiasm you're tripping over some of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and way of doing things - which is true of almost all new editors to some degree. If I might make a few suggestions: These sort of adjustments are common with new editors to the encyclopedia, and we all have a learning curve, but you clearly have it in you to get past these little bumps. I look forward to seeing your contributions on Wikipedia. --12:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * We have certain requirements about notability of subjects to get their own articles, and tend to speedily delete articles that don't match that (you'd be surprised at how many new articles are about the band that the article writer is planning to form next week, or their cat, or that cute guy in history class; we don't want this encyclopedia to turn into The International Guide To Cute Guys In History Class). So when you're building a new article, you may want to do it on one of your user pages until it has the information needed to show this is a subject worthy of inclusion -- that doesn't mean a long article, just one that covers they question of "why is this worth space in an encyclopedia?". Then you can move that article into what we call "article space", where the articles live.
 * You may want to be careful about writing articles or editing articles in such a way where it feels like you're promoting something. There are plenty of places on the internet for official promotion - Facebook pages and the like. In fact, if you end up with a page which feels like it would make a good facebook page for the person or group you're writing about, then you've probably missed the mark in terms of making a good Wikipedia page. (This is particularly true when you copy material wholesale off of the website of the group you're writing about, as you apparently did with the ASRC - that creates problems not only with point-of-view, but with our our policies on violating copyright.)
 * I'm about to hit you with another warning message, which may look ugly but isn't. You've selected a user name that makes it sound like your edits represent the ASRC, which means that the user names are against our policy. That's not going to kick you off, that will just kick your username off - and changing to a different username is pretty easy.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Arsc edit) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. The article in question is Arctic Region Supercomputing Center. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:00, 25 October 2011 (UTC)