User talk:Arseguet

Welcome!

 * }

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Enomatic has been reverted. Your edit here to Enomatic was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/user/enomaticusa) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Enomatic


A tag has been placed on Enomatic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gorlack36 (talk) 16:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I'm trying to create an article about Enomatic and I'm sincerly willing to do it according Wikipedia criteria. I don't understand the Speedy Detection, what is the problem at the moment, as the page hasn't been put online. I'd like to get a review of my article and discuss the issues that you may encounter, especially for I'm writing about a company. So please, if you could review my article and give me some advice, I'll be happy to follow them. Try not to block me before we try to solve the problem together. Thanks!Arseguet (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Arseguet (talk) 16:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC) Arseguet

Query about user name
Are you the same person who previously edited under the user name Enomatic? JamesBWatson (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I've asked for a change of user name, but it seems easier to create a new account as I had nothing on it. I hope this is not a problem. I gave references that time and will remove anything that could be too pushy. Arseguet (talk) 19:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Arseguet
 * That's fine, but it's better to say that you are the same user, to avoid anyone accusing you of pretending to be two people for deceptive purposes. Unfortunately there are a lot of people who do that, so people can get suspicious if it looks as though one person has two accounts. JamesBWatson (talk)

My account was blocked because of my username which can't be a company's one. What would be the next step, once I've created the article and gave references? I'ld like to put it online, making sure nobody will block me or claim for advertisement. Thanks for your help.Arseguet (talk) 19:46, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Arseguet


 * It is best not to create an article about your own company at all, as you have a conflict of interest, and may find it more difficult than you realise to write objectively. It is difficult to stand back and see how your writing about something you are closely involved in will look to an outsider. However, if you like you can post it to a page in your own "userspace", rather than as an article, and I will look at it and give you my opinion. That simply means that you give it a title starting with "User:Arseguet/", to indicate that it is your local page rather than a global article. User:Arseguet/Enomatic would be the obvious title. If you click on that red link, a blank page will appear for you to post the draft article to. It is much less likely to be deleted than an article. It could still be speedily deleted if it is felt to be blatant spam, but not for lesser reasons such as not indicating notability, and even for spam the deletion borderline for a userspace page tends to be somewhat higher than for an article. I also recommend putting at the top of the page. That will produce a message saying that it is a userspace draft rather than an article, and any reasonable administrator will understand that a draft may not be in a suitable form yet for becoming an article. I may not have time to look at it for a while, but if you do post it and I haven't got back to you in 24 hours please post a reminder on my talk page, as I have an unfortunate tendency to forget. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Another thing you could do, once you have created a draft in user space, is to ask for opinions at Requests for feedback. Sometimes there can be very useful feedback on a draft article, sometimes not, but it's worth a try. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:17, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your tips, I've done everything according to you. I'm now waiting for a final review, following the request I posted. Hope it's gonna be fine. Cheers. Arseguet (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Arseguet

Your Editor Review
Hey there Arseguet, you had posted an editor review asking for someone to look at your new userspace creation. I removed the request, as its not an actual editor review, but will look at the article.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  12:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Somewhat better
Regarding User:Arseguet/Enomatic, the sourcing is much improved since I last looked at it.

However, you need to decide what this article is about. Currently it contains three subjects: the inventor, the company, and the product. Only one of them is notable enough for an article on Wikipedia, because notability is not inherited by virtue of association with something notable.

I suggest you rewrite it about the product. What is it called? The same name as the company? The product appears to be the primary focus of the article now. The product is what has coverage in reliable sources. The product is what has been certified by two certification bodies (and this should be mentioned in the lead paragraph).

Remove the hype in the photo caption about the inventor. The section about the patent is irrelevant. There is no need to describe intellectual property the company owns if that property doesn't have coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. This section contains only a primary source, and is unclear how this is associated with the product.

Hope that helps. Keep trying. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice, I also think it makes more sense to focus on the Wine Dispenser. Here is a try, let me know what you think of it. Thank you so much for your time. Arseguet (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

I need a review for this article, I'ld like to set it online by the end of the week. Thank you. Arseguet (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Then easily hit submit in the box at the top and press save! Oh and please: click on the images and read: I marked both images as "please send a permission" to Wikimedia Foundation, because the images are likely PR images and thus not released under this license. mabdul 23:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Arseguet/Enomatic has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Enomatic, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 04:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I'ld like to publish this article. Need your opinion and authorization. Thank you !
 * There you go, I published the article, by the way, it's a nice article. :) oh, regarding, the photos, you can do what mabdul said as it looks like a promotional photo.--Hallows AG (talk) 07:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Enomatic Press Kit 2011.pdf


A tag has been placed on File:Enomatic Press Kit 2011.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. mabdul 23:46, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Editor Review
I am currently cleaning up the backlog over at Editor Review and I found this in the backlog. As it is no longer posted on the main page at Editor Review, I was wondering if I should remove it from the backlogs and put it to rest or if I should repost it for community review. I will remove it from the backlogs three days from now if I am not given a response.— cyberpower Offline Happy 2013 19:32, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Enomatic wine dispenser for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enomatic wine dispenser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Enomatic wine dispenser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PierceG (talk) 02:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)