User talk:Arsenikk/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Vildanden
Hei! Welcome to Wikipedia. And welcome to Wikipedia:WikiProject Norway; we can use all the help we can get.

Just made a very minor edit to the excellent article you contributed, Vildanden (airline). Overall an extremely nice bit of work (and especially exceptional for a new contributor). The last sentence of Vildanden puzzles me though; could you perhaps confirm it is correct as written?

Tusen takk - Williamborg 13:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. What I meant anyway is that the aircraft has www.vildanden.no on the side and the duck logo on the tailplane. Fixed up the sentence a litte. Hope its ok now, if not, be bold. Otherwise I will be trying to go through all the norwegian airport and airline articles and upgrading them, and the odd local bit on Trøndersk stuff Arsenikk 23:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Your current edit reads very well now! Appreciate your taking the time to make it clear. I look forward to seeing more of your work. Williamborg 01:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!
 Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can [ watchlist it] if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including WPMILHIST Announcements there.
 * Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
 * Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
 * Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, or periods.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 15:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 11:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006
The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 11:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Alcoa logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Alcoa logo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Trøndelag
Nice to see another Norwegian join the Wikipedia. Good to have someone who understands Norwegian topics well.

I modified your Trøndelag edit, citing what I thought the relevant Wikipolicy (see discussion page for Trøndelag). If you've got an alternate policy to cite, let's talk; we need to get it straightened out (i.e., get the policy requirements consistent). Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 04:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

DYK
Congratulations! Keep up the good work! --Srikeit (Talk 08:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Iran Air destinations
Hi. I see you recently created Iran Air destinations. Did you know there was also Iran Air Destinations? (I think your spelling is better.) Do you have a view what is best to do about this? (I won't be editing either - I just noticed Qeshm was linked to by both, and thought that odd.) 195.128.251.215 09:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Flags in airline articles
I noticed you've been adding the infobox to a bunch of airlines. There are quite a few to do, so any contributions in that area are great. However, there have been a couple discussions on putting flags next to city names and the decision was to leave them out, so please just put the city (and country) name in the infobox, but not the flags. Thanks. DB (talk) 00:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Citations for Rapid transit
Hi there. First of all, thank you for improving the article. It's in much better shape. I was going over some of the citaions you've provided, and I'm concerned about their credibility. Wikipedia can only use sources as described by WP:RS. Sites like UrbanRail.net should generally be avoided because they're self published. Thanks! -- Selmo  (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * BTW, if you're interested, feel free to join WikiProject Rapid transit.

WikiProject Airports
Greetings! While reviewing the assessment change log for WikiProject Airports, I noticed that you created the article Berlevåg Airport. You contribution to improving Wikipedia's collection of airport articles is greatly appreciated. If at all interested, I'd like to extend an invitation to join the project. You can join by simply adding your name to the list of participants. If not interested, please disregard this message. Thanks! thadius856talk 19:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Aeroflot Don destinations
In case you hadn't noticed, Aeroflot Don destinations has been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 07:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Verran Sparebank
Hei, fin artikkel om Verran Sparebank, men jeg måtte skrive den om pga av fusjon med Grong Sparebank. Tar du den også? De har jo blitt en interessant regional faktor i Nord-Trøndelag.

Hello, I've enjoyed your article on Verran Sparebank, but had to rewrite it as they've merged with Grong Sparebank, whom You also might want to write about!? --Orland 16:51, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

moved template
I moved the template you created into template space at Template:Infobox tunnel. Cheers!--Kchase T 04:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Trondheim Tramway, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  02:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Airport Helgeland
Hi Arsenikk! You may be interested in this AFD debate, and wonder if you have anything to add about it. From what I can see, the justification for the article is dubious, but there may of course be supporting sources which I have failed to find and which would justify a Wikipedia article. I have seen that you frequently have better sources than I do on transportation issues so any contribution to that discussion would be welcome. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Flytoget logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Flytoget logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alcoa logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Alcoa logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nexus Trafikk
An editor has nominated Nexus Trafikk, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 08:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

TGS-NOPEC
hello, please change the name of 'TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Systems' to 'TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company' as that is the correct company name...

thank you!

Shannon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smorolez (talk • contribs) 17:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject Aviation Newsletter delivery
The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 18:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stavanger Station
An editor has nominated Stavanger Station, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 16:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SpareBank_1_logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SpareBank_1_logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 04:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gardermoen Braathens and SAS.jpeg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gardermoen Braathens and SAS.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 18:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Aeroflot Don logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aeroflot Don logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 16:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mesta_logo.png
I have tagged Image:Mesta_logo.png as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:SIVA_logo.gif
I have tagged Image:SIVA_logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 22:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Argentum_logo.gif
I have tagged Image:Argentum_logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Logos:
The fair-use rationle has to be IN DEPTH, 1-2 lines is NOT suffcient. You might want to see what other uploaders have used. ShakespeareFan00 10:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Regional Health Authority
Hi Arsenikk. You are off to such a great start on the article Regional Health Authority that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. Appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee  (Talk) 18:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Aker Finnyards Helsinki Aerial.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aker Finnyards Helsinki Aerial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Osllogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Osllogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Gardermoen_Aerial_View.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gardermoen_Aerial_View.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 21:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Trondheim. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 12:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Diplom-Is
Hi Arsenikk. You are off to such a great start on the article Diplom-Is that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. The Main Page gets about 4,000,000 hits per day and appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Also, don't forget to keep checking back at Did you know suggestions for comments regarding your nomination. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee  (Talk) 01:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Trains in Europe
Hi Arsenikk,

I would like to ask you a favor, since I am planning on starting a wikiproject by the name WikiProject Trains in Europe if you could consider developing it. Takk for your time! --H|H irohisat Talk 22:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Statkraft Logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Statkraft Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Midtnorsk Helikopter
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Midtnorsk Helikopter, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Midtnorsk Helikopter seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Midtnorsk Helikopter, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Midtnorsk Helikopter
Midtnorsk Helikopter, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Midtnorsk Helikopter satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Midtnorsk Helikopter and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Midtnorsk Helikopter during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Russavia 21:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Petter Jansen
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Petter Jansen, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Petter Jansen seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Petter Jansen, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Midtnorsk Helikopter logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Midtnorsk Helikopter logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Norwegian hospitals
It's a fine box you have made for Norw. hospitals! Som proposals: State-Run agencies could be Government agencies, to make clear that these are not enterprises like the HF. Eastern and Southern was fusioned by June 1 this year into South-East. Norw. Board og Health ... is now named Norwegian Board of Health Supervision. Should the enterprises within each region be alphabetized? Helge Høi 10:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Camillo Eitzen & Co
Did you remove the prod tag I put on this article without discussion? Murderbike 11:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SeaDrill logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:SeaDrill logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Petrojarl logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Petrojarl logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Fjord1 logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fjord1 logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi
A tag has been placed on J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 19:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KrasAir logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:KrasAir logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Air Moldova Logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Air Moldova Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Scandinavian Bunkering
A tag has been placed on Scandinavian Bunkering, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. -- WebHamste r 22:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HydroTexaco logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:HydroTexaco logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on ErgoGroup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb 18:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Nor-Cargo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb 22:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that
As you probably know already, the new page patrol is entirely voluntary and I decided to give it a shot. I have nominated, I believe, about 30 articles today for speedy deletion, and all but three of them have been deleted - two of those being kept were yours, the third one had been substantially modified by the time the tag was removed. In many other articles I have added the,  , and/or  tags which are not requests for administrator intervention, but rather an invitation for article improvement. Sometimes, in this kind of work, we are to exert judgment - and sometimes judgment fails.

I once had one of my own articles marked for speedy deletion, only to see the request declined. All I can tell you is, that sort of things happens. That it happened to the same person twice on the same day is... well... not particularly enjoyable for that person. But I am happy, under the circumstances, after reviewing what I was asking for, that my request was declined. --Blanchardb 22:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Requested Move Completion
Your requested move from Nycomed Holdings A/S – Nycomed was successful. Apologies for the lengthy request response time. Rudget Contributions 16:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Luftfartsverket Norway logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Luftfartsverket Norway logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Norwegian Property logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Norwegian Property logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hitra Wind Farm
Hitra Wind Farm, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Hitra Wind Farm satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Hitra Wind Farm and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Hitra Wind Farm during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Mike .lifeguard  &#124; @en.wb 14:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Braathens logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Braathens logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of K7 Bulletin
A tag has been placed on K7 Bulletin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ridernyc 10:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. DGG (talk) 11:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Norway coverage
Hi, it's time to appreciate your focus on Norway-related articles, particularly the many companies, agencies, organizations etc. It helps readers understand Norway better. It is a real shame that you have to put up with the widespread speedying, prodding and afd'ing of your articles. If you like, feel free to let me know in case of an AFD etc.

As you might have noticed I like to create articles on Norwegian things as well, but I mostly concentrate on various biographies and sports. After seeing your last creation (Terra) I started to think about other similar topics we need, i.e. Finance Credit, Carl Fredrik Seim, The 5 Percent Community. I don't really like to "pile" tasks on other editors, but you do these things well, so... If you have no objections I might bring some future requests to your attention. Feel free to do the same the other way around. Punkmorten (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Stein Ole Larsen
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Stein Ole Larsen, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Stein Ole Larsen seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Stein Ole Larsen, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Geir Waage
A tag has been placed on Geir Waage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whitstable 14:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Talk Page
Hi,

I noticed that your talk page is starting to get rather large.

If you would like, you can Archiveyour page so that it not so crowded. For more information click here

 The Helpful One (Talk)(Contributions) 14:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but...
Hi... this time I'm very sorry to nag on you like everyone else, but I really don't reckon Norwegian mayors are notable (and worthy of inclusion) unless they did something special. I think I will actually AFD Ole Tronstad. WP:AFDP says "Municipal politicians: Municipal politicians are not inherently notable just for being in politics, but neither are they inherently non-notable just because they're in local politics — evaluate each case on its own individual merits. Mayors of major cities have usually survived AFD, although the article should say more than just "Jane Doe is the mayor of Cityville". Mayors of smaller towns, however, are generally deemed not notable just for being mayors, although they may be notable for other reasons in addition to their mayoralty". I unfortunately believe Tronstad fails. The similar case could be made for the mayors of Hemnes, Hattfjelldal etc although they are more borderline. Punkmorten 23:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Concerning Ole Tronstad I would claim that he is on the right side of the border because of his length of term and involvement in other aspects of politics, but I have understanding if you disagree. Concerning the mayors of Hemnes and Hattfjelldal though, their notability is not related to their position as Mayor of their respective hamlets par cet, but for being involved in the Terra Securities scandal. Because of the massive, excessive and prolonged intensity of this case in the media, the four "Nordland-mayors" have all became notable through this case. Per this mid-week there were more than 7,000 media articles related to the case published, and a significant number of them refer to these mayors. Arsenikk 18:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Which other aspects? But yeah I will probably leave the "Terra mayors" alone. Hope this won't be a big setback for your productivity here :) Punkmorten 21:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

merge
Hi, I'm proposing to redirect a lot of the House of Justice member pages, see here: Talk:Universal House of Justice Cuñado  ☼ -  Talk  20:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gjensidige NOR logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Gjensidige NOR logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kongsberg Automotive logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kongsberg Automotive logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Activity survey for members of WikiProject Companies

 * placed on talk pages of all participants

I wanted to get a notion of the level of activity of people who are members of WikiProject Companies with respect to monitoring the WikiProject Talk page and participating in discussions of interest and/or responding to requests for input.

Could you please visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies/Member information and adding yourself to one or more of the several groupings listed?

Thanks for your assistance.

--User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 03:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:OVDS logo.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OVDS logo.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 22:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:OVDS logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:OVDS logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Meråkerbanen/Nordlandbanen
Hej!

Jag har ändrat lite på några artiklar som du skrivit ang. Meråkerbanen och Nordlansbanen. Eftersom du skriver i många järnbaneartiklar vill bara göra dig uppmärksam på att Nordlandsbanen går mellan Hell och Bodö (ej Trondheim - Hell) och Meråkerbanen går mellan Trondheim och Storlien (inkl Trondheim - Hell). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.255.67.152 (talk) 20:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I utgangspunktet ville jeg vært enig med deg, men ifølge denne linken fra Jernbaneverket går banen fra Hell til Storlien, og ikke fra Trondheim. Jeg prøver egentlig å unngå å skrive spesifikt om dette, men vil forholde meg til denne referansen med mindre jeg kommer over en annen en som motbeviser det (følgelig fra Jernbaneverket). Arsenikk (talk) 20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Södra logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Södra logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Vitusapotek: inclusion of legal status "AS"
Hi there. I see you've removed my addition of "AS" from the opening line for the Vitusapotek article; the article title "Vitusapotek" is correct, and should not change, but I always understood that the full name (of "Vitusapotek AS" in this case) should be included in the title sentence in bold (see NC-CORP, 4th paragraph). The rest of the article then reverts to the common name, Vitusapotek. Examples are Royal Bank of Scotland and Wal-Mart.

What do you think? Carbonix (talk) 17:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. I agree with you on your interpretation of the rules. The reason I did this was that as I see it that while the article Norsk Medisinaldepot is about the company, the article Vitusapotek is about the chain, and not about the company. And since 2007 Norsk Medisinaldept, NMD Grossisthandel and Vitusapotek have been merged into one legal entity. As such I have also added 'AS' to Norsk Medisinaldepot's heading, but removed it from Vitusapotek. Arsenikk (talk) 17:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Right. I can see what you mean and eventually found the 'merging' you refer to; I was relying too heavily on the company's website and even their contact address, which still use AS!  Carbonix (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Kristin Halvorsen
Kristins løftebrudd er relevant for artikkelen, akkurat som Watergate skulle være relevant for Richard Nixon. Nastykermit (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 09:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * There are a number of critical errors to the comment added about Halvorsen. First, the election was in 2005, not in 2006. Second, there are used a number of wiesel words that should be avoided in Wikipedia. But the most critical part, and the reason for me reverting your edit was that the last sentence, "and this is today seen as one of the biggest lies and broken promises made a Norwegian politician." cannot under any way be seed as encyclopedic. The problem lays in that the claim cannot be verifiable for the population as a whole. And even if some people feel this way, it would be incorrect to generalize about the topic as such. Further, you should be careful (even if it is difficult sometimes) when writing about living people, even if they are politicians. This whole claim should be verified through independent third-party sources. Don't be surprised if it is removed if this claim cannot be verified. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia; remember to be bold. Arsenikk (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

You cant have one without the other. Halvorsen failed to honor her promise and its vital for an objective WIKI biography thayt we mention all sides. Lets try to keep party politics outside this. Nastykermit (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vildanden Logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Vildanden Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cresco logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Cresco logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Comair Limited Logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Comair Limited Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Farzam Arbab
Hello,

Can you please provide me with the reference to the birth date of Farzam Arbab? I have changed it to the date found here: for now.

Regards, T0lk (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * My source was http://bahaikipedia.org/Farzam_Arbab which agrees with your date. So this has probably been a transcription error from my side. Arsenikk (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem, I find that I make tons of mistakes when I do this kind of work :p T0lk (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Brynjar Aa
Hi I was wondering if you could help save this article from deletion. Its currently up for afd. I;m certain something in Norwegian can be translated to expand it. I think it is notable but google is lacking. Could you consider seeing (this and This ) and try to expand it. Brynjar Å is also another form of the name. Could you help mate? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 13:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Little context in Category:Oil fields by operator
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Oil fields by operator, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Oil fields by operator is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Oil fields by operator, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Student Union of the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration
Another editor has added the  template to the article Student Union of the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

NSB BM65
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of NSB BM65, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.prescriptiondrug-info.com/drug_information_online.asp?title=NSB_BM65. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

NSB BM87
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of NSB BM87, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.prescriptiondrug-info.com/drug_information_online.asp?title=NSB_BM87. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

NSB BM89
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of NSB BM89, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.prescriptiondrug-info.com/drug_information_online.asp?title=NSB_BM89. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

NSB BM91
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of NSB BM91, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.prescriptiondrug-info.com/drug_information_online.asp?title=NSB_BM91. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Infobox tunnel documentation
Hey Arsenikk, I asked a question about what some of the parameters at Template:Infobox tunnel mean, maybe you can help. Cheers, --Commander Keane (talk) 07:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Tore Sandvik
Hi! Why did you change the link to Tore O. Sandvik to Tore Sandvik? Tore Sandvik seems to be another person, an orienteerer. Punkmorten (talk) 21:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, my mistake, I though I checked that out a few days ago when I was converting some other red links, but I must have gotten things mixed up. Thanks for letting me know though. Arsenikk (talk) 21:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes!
Finally we have pages for all the current ministries. Hurra! And thanks. Punkmorten (talk) 18:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

New category
Category:Directors of government agencies of Norway - new category. Punkmorten (talk) 09:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Norwegian Police University College logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Norwegian Police University College logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

DYK
If sources are added, Norwegian Universities and Colleges Admission Service could be a DYK too. Punkmorten (talk) 09:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:AirBridge Cargo logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:AirBridge Cargo logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:


 * Image:Cultura Bank logo.png
 * Image:Aker American Shipping logo.png

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --00:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Business world
Hi! I took a stab at creating business bios Wenche Kjølås and Annette Malm Justad. I hope they are satisfactory. The business world is important and your contributions have been most valuable. We need Jens Ulltveit-Moe. Happy 17 May! Punkmorten (talk) 19:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way: A group of editors spearheaded by Knut Olav Åmås will release a Who's Who book in late 2008 or early 2009, with profiles of 1000 influential Norwegians. Rather exciting. Our coverage of politics is approaching a fair level of broadness now, but we need to develop the fields of academia, the legal system, bureaucracy, (interest) organizations (including LO, NHO), industry and business, religious life.. You just keep up your great work :) Punkmorten (talk) 19:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * You're on a roll! Punkmorten (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale
Thanks for uploading:


 * Image:AirAland logo.gif.
 * Image:AirFinland logo.gif
 * Image:Air Norway Logo.png
 * Image:Aker Floating Production Logo.gif
 * Image:Aker Seafoods Logo.png
 * Image:Aker drilling logo.png
 * Image:BAA Aberdeen logo.png
 * Image:BaneTele Logo.gif
 * Image:Bank DnB Nord logo.png
 * Image:Bergen Air Transport Logo.png
 * Image:Bergen bank logo.gif
 * Image:Blom ASA logo.png

You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Some BS
BTW, what brought you to my page to begin with? Trekphiler (talk)
 * If it's tagged wrong, you need to fix the page, 'cause it said Sweden. (Or I thought it did... I may well have misread it, I was tagging a few in a bit of a hurry.) Trekphiler (talk) 15:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

English name
Hi! Any idea which English name to use for the defunct government agency Statens Informasjonstjeneste? Cf. the new article Odd Strand. Punkmorten (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Stub type process
You're right in that there's a number of different things going on in different cases. Some types are approved "speedily", and some (at least in theory) take five days. Add to which, some are only proposed as upmerged templates, and some already exist as such. In the case of your proposal, I assumed you were already aware of (some of) the distinction(s), given your "based on S2" comment -- which is indeed, I think, a sufficient condition for speedy creation, if there is indeed at least 60 such stubs at present, hence my support. (If there's not, I'd instead suggest creation of an upmerged template.) Hope that helps somewhat. Alai (talk) 16:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

TDM
Dear friend. Transportation Demand Management is a technical term widely used in transportation engineering, usually refered as TDM, and similar to the term Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), so I think your unconsulted change of the name is wrong. I kindly request you undo it and raise the issue for discussion in the Talk page. Mariordo (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks Alasdair. You should also know that I like, and spend some time watching your contributions list. I like to read your great contributions to Norwegian related articles. Rettetast (talk) 13:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

And your recent 19th-century bios inspired me to create a slew of notables from the Skien and Porsgrunn area. Good sources are lying around, fortunately. Most of them were related in some way, through intricate marriages. Punkmorten (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Haha, just like my hometown&mdash;where everyone is everyones second cousin. Good work on these ancient people, and amazing good references you have found. Personally I was just removing red links on Bergensbanen with some library books. Arsenikk (talk)  22:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Category changes - Metro-Airport (VTA)
Hello there!

On the page Metro-Airport (VTA), you removed Category:Airport rail links and added Category:Railway stations serving airports in the United Kingdom.

I've reverted this change as this light rail station is located in the United States, not the United Kingdom. If you've made similar changes to other articles, you may want to check them to ensure that those changes are acurate.

Take care.

--Brianvdb (talk) 05:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks; I was having some problems with HotCat, and went through an extra time to double check all the UK/US articles, but I guess one just slipped through. Thanks for fixing it up and letting me know :) Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  08:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I've categorized the Mountain View - Winchester (VTA) article as Category:Airport rail links and the station serving the airport in Category:Railway stations serving airports in the United States. Hope that is to your approval. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  08:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Looks great. Thanks!  --Brianvdb (talk) 01:04, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Skabo
Hello!

I found your name on the list of WP:WikiProject Trains participants where I also noticed you're from Norway. I thought you'd maybe be interested in taking a look at something that I think someone like you could fix easily.

Škabo is an article about a Serbian rapper. One of the redirects to this article is Skabo which seems to be a short version of Skabo Jernbanevognfabrikk and I'm led to believe that this was a Norwegian manufacturer of trains. There seem to be a few articles that link to Skabo but they are then incorrectly redirected to the article about the Serbian rapper.

I took an educated guess that you might be one of the better qualified people on here to write at least a stub on Skabo Jernbanevognfabrikk so that train articles that contain a link to Skabo are not redirected to Škabo. I would have done it myself but a Google search on Skabo Jernbanevognfabrikk brings up almost exclusively Norwegian articles so I really can't come up with any verifiable material.

Let me know if this is something you might be able to do or if, maybe, I should bring it up to the WPTrains community in general.

Peace! SWik78 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note. Skabo Jernbanevognfabrikk is on my mental list of articles to write "some day"; at present it is not near the top, partially due to lack of good sources. Since I am responsible for most of these links myself, what should be done is that Skabo becomes a disambiguation page and that links to Škabo and Skabo Jernbanevognfabrikk, and that I try to get better at not linking directly to Skabo. I can not promise to get around to this immediately, but I can look into it soon. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  14:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * That sounds like a workable solution. I was hoping to avoid a disambiguation page with a red-linked entry but I guess, acording to WP:MOSDAB, there's no harm in it until we gather up enough material for a stub.
 * Thanks for responding.
 * Peace! SWik78 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * There seems to be an article on the Norwegian Wikipedia (with references), so translation should be imminent. I will do some dabbing, and get around to it soon. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  22:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I have fixed the incoming links to Skabo. Rettetast (talk) 22:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks Rettetast. I've written the article now; it has about as many lines with reference as content. Might look around for more tomorrow and see if I can get it up to DYK standards. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  22:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Telenor
Apax Partners acquired Telenor Satellite Services which was a subsidiary of Telenor for which there is no article on Wikipedia. If you think it is not productive or confusing to keep it on there it can come out. &#124;► ϋ r b a n я e n e w a l ◄&#124; (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

By the way if you are interested in private equity I having been working on a history of private equity and venture capital that I am trying to get someone to read and provide comments / edits. &#124;► ϋ r b a n я e n e w a l ◄&#124; (talk) 21:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * That is one impressive article you have written. I will most certainly look into it; private equity is one of my interests. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Category for Deletion
Given your comments earlier, would love to get your help on Categories for discussion/Log/2008 June 10&#124;► ϋ r b a n я e n e w a l ◄&#124; (talk) 04:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
Thank you as well. I enjoy the fact that you use good referencing in your articles, and user boxes, those are always good to have. Keep filling in those gaps and continued good luck with the editing to you too. Manxruler (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Redundant parent categories
Hi, when you add categories to articles, as with Travel, please make sure that the article is not already in the category via a parent. In the case of Travel, that article is in Category:Travel, which is itself a member of Category:Transportation, so it is not necessary (or desirable) to add the article directly to Category:Transportation. Happy editing! --MCB (talk) 00:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Categories for Drawbar (haulage)
They seem to be to be more general than trucks. Trailers hooked to cars have them, for example. So please think more widely when you remove a category. I believe you are mistaken in your categorisation. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. I am attempting to clean up Category:Transportation that was a mess, and remove all topics not in the core to subcategories. I appreciate your concerns, and I will look a little harder for a good category for this; I hope you understand I do not consider it a central topic in transport, even if it is used between modes. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Oddly not central, but strangely universal. A paradox.  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Not that I've looked, but is there a cat "Transportation Equipment"? That might suit better.  I see where you're headed.  A drawbar is also used in aviation, to link the tug to the nosewheel for pushing back.  They get everywhere!  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Detroit Automobile Company GA Review
Thanks for the review, but I'd like to counter some of your points which don't quite make sense: 1a) Infoboxes are not mandatory, and in this case, there would be very little information to add to one (making it pointless adding one...) 2a) Ref 1 is fixed, and ref 9 has no title because it is the same book as ref 4. You obviously don't understand how citing books works. See WP:CITE. 3a) There is little information in the article because the information simply doesn't exist. If you had read the article, you would have found that: "Little is known about the company's designs." As you can see, I used a wide range of books for the research, but indeed found little information. — <strong style="color:#f42c39;">Wackymacs ( talk  ~  edits ) 07:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

DYK
Hi again. Did you realise your latest DYK, Skabo Jernbanevognfabrikk, isn't listed at Recent additions? Strange. Manxruler (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I have asked the good man who administrated the DYK look into the matter. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  12:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. Another admin left a note to say he didn't have time to do the credits but I didn't realize he hadn't updated the archive either. Problem is now fixed. Gatoclass (talk) 12:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Transportation Categories
Hi. I saw that you removed Personal Rapid Transit from the Transport category, and added it to the Rail category, which wasn't quite correct. I presume this is because you are trying to rationalize the Transport category, and PRT isn't really appropriate as a top-level category? If that's the case, then I agree, but it does need to be categorized in the hierarchy somewhere. To that end, I've created a new category, Automated Guideway Transport, which includes PRT, Dual-Mode, and Automated People Movers. I'm taking my queues from the American Public Transportation Association, which classifies all of these modes under the AGT label, and in turn seems worthy of top-level inclusion in the Transport category. What do you think? Skybum (talk) 16:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Good idea. To be quite honest I know very litle about PRT, so I was a little confused as to the categorization. The general rule seems to be that if it considered a mode of transport, it can go in Category:Transportation; if it is not a separate mode it goes under the modes respective category.


 * There does seem to be a category called Category:Alternatives to conventional railways with the description "The articles in this category describe transportation technologies that are like railways in that vehicles move along fixed structures that guide their movements (and typically restrict it to either backwards or forwards), but which differ from conventional railways in that the vehicles do not rest on steel wheels that roll along two parallel rails. Both existing and hypothetical technologies belong here." I would claim that this would be the proper category to stick PRT and similar into. Concerning rail transport as a mode, it is related to the guiding, rather than use of actual tracks. Unfortunately the mode has a somewhat misleading name for this understanding.


 * My final concern is the categorization capitalization of the category; only proper nouns are to be categorized capitalized using only capital letters, see WP:TITLE. The link you provided is filled with capitalization errors, in case you wondered. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  17:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'll definitely fix the capitalization errors, and thanks for pointing that out. It seems to me, based on what you're saying, that PRT should indeed be included in the root transportation category, as it is a distinctive mode of transit that is almost entirely unlike rail. It does use guideways that superficially resemble rails, but this is no more indicative of its functionality than the fact that cars, buses, and trains all use wheels. Unlike trains -- or any other "alternatives to trains" -- PRT does not do fixed-route, fixed-schedule, line-haul operations. Rather, it uses small vehicles that are available on demand, which can self-navigate through an ad-hoc mesh network -- much more like cars on roads than trains on rails. Functionally, the closest to PRT would be taxis, rather than trains. Since PRT, by definition, can never use large vehicles, human drivers, scheduled service, or line-haul configurations, I don't feel that it is appropriate to categorize it with other systems that generally have all of these features.


 * (If you're having some difficulty picturing how PRT works, based on my description, check out this 3.5-minute promotional video from PRT vendor, which illustrates the technology fairly well.)


 * The only potential problem with including PRT as a top-level transit category -- and the reason I thought that you'd removed it -- is that is currently exceedingly rare, and hence potentially not notable enough for top-level categorization. Although a number of prototype systems have been built over the years, there is only one quasi-PRT system currently in public use, another full-PRT system under construction, and several more in the late planning stage. If you don't think that rarity is a disqualifier, then let's put it as a top-level category. If it is a disqualifier, then automated guideway transport definitely seems like the place to put it. Even though the network structures and service capabilities of AGT and PRT bear no similarity to each other, at least it would then be lumped in with other transit systems that are always fully-automated, and generally use much smaller vehicles than rail systems (although not as small as PRT). Skybum (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for a good video :) From what I could see, it is structurally such as maglev: "like railways in that vehicles move along fixed structures that guide their movements" (note: guide, not dictate). I fear that if PRT was included in Transportation, a lot of other stuff would have to; not that I as such have anything against many top-category articles. To compare: a bus, automobile and an electric forklift all belong to the same mode, since they have wheels on a a (sort of) flat surface, and can control themselves, yet their operation can be of immense difference. My opinion is that PRT belongs in Category:Alternatives to conventional railways, not Category:Transportation. If you feel the former category should go straight into the latter, that might be a correct solution; I do not know. I also notice there is no top level article for the former (preferably with a better name). <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  17:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Glad you liked the video! I see your reasoning in regards to the top-level Transportation category, but I still have qualms about including it in Category:Alternatives to conventional railways. Possibly I'm biased; I've been studying PRT for almost a decade, and have come to believe that one of the most striking things about it is how completely unlike a train it is -- so defining it relation to trains just kind of rankles, if you don't mind me saying so. It's almost exactly midway between being an alternative to a train and an alternative to a car. On the other hand, many kind of non-PRT AGT systems absolutely do functions as train alternatives, so the AGT category definitely belongs there, even if PRT does not. So, I don't know -- the problem with category trees is that they imply singular rigid ontological hierarchies on things that actually are very multifaceted, fuzzy, and overlapping. Perhaps the best way to organize the transportation categories would be in several parallel streams: one covering the physical aspect (roads / rails and other guideways / animals / water / wings / et cetera), and another covering the usage (public transport / private transport / Industrial / et cetera)? Just a thought. Skybum (talk) 20:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

New idea
Hi! At the new Minister of the Navy and Postal Affairs (Norway), I made up a system to distinguish between different names of ministries without making new tables for every "era" (like it's done on e.g. Minister of Finance (Norway)). It certainly looks cleaner. Do you like it? Punkmorten (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks good :) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  19:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Move of the ferry Hydro
I hope you don't mind terribly, but I just moved your article on the ferry named Hydro to SF Hydro in order to conform with English language conventions. Dampferge is after all steam ferry in English. A similar thing was done when DS Donau was moved to SS Donau. Congratulations with MF Storegut, by the way. A lead article with its image on the main page and everything. Great work indeed. :) Manxruler (talk) 18:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no idea as to the naming conventions to ships; I presume you are better informed and trust your decision. All I have ever written on ships is the Tinnsjø ferries. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  19:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I presume that DF Ammonia and DF Rjukanfoss should be moved too then? <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  19:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I would recommend that, yes. For more on the naming of ships, see Naming conventions (ships), although that article deals mostly with military ships. Manxruler (talk) 19:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Reference template
Sorry to bother you of all the project members but i`ve a question and i liked the fact that i`ve been here only one day longer than you (And i have no barnstars. Sad) In the Spanish wikipedia there is a template that allows long Refferences lists to be put in a text box with scrollbar, really useful, i think.

Here is an example http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico

How can that be added to the tools in the english wikipedia?

I`ll apreciate an answer, wheter on my talk page or here. Thanks Zidane tribal (talk) 09:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. I am sorry, but there is no such template on the English Wikipedia. The reason is that Citing sources states: "Scrolling lists, for example of references, should never be used because of issues with readability, accessibility, printing, and site mirroring. Additionally, it cannot be guaranteed that such lists will display properly in all web browsers." What I recoment instead is using to create a references list over two or three coulombs (depending on the average length of each). This usually reduces the length by a fair amount. I am sorry I gave your the answer you did not want, but I believe it is for the better. Happy editing <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk  <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  09:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

DYK

 * Nice work with the Big Boy! --Orland (talk) 21:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the compliments :) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  08:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. Can't find this either on Recent additions. Lead article and all, nowhere to be found in the recents. Manxruler (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I am somewhat glad you keep checking the recent additions ;) Thanks, <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  20:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. I do like to keep track on the recent Norwegian DYKs. I've just prodded the folks over at Portal:Norway to update the Portal:Norway/DYK. We've got, by my count, nine DYKs not yet listed there. Manxruler (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks very much for the barnstar. Greatly appreciated, especially from such a redoubtable editor as yourself. Best, Gr1st (talk) 23:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Merger proposal
Dear Arsenikk,

I read your poisonous message and would like to make it clear to you that I did NOT propose to merge the transport and shipping articles. What I DID propose is to merge shipping INTO transport. Before you say it’s all the same, let me point out to you that there are TWO different templates, one for each case. You may read all about it at Merging_and_moving_pages.

I did NOT stated any reason for the proposal, because I have more important things to do, like educating young students.

Your happiness is of no concern to me whatsoever, but I already wrote a justification for the merger, as short as I could, just to humor me.

I do not care to discuss my proposal with you or anyone else. Again, I have better things to do. You or anybody else can do with my proposal whatever you see fit.

Fear not. You are welcome to remove those two banners or anything else that you feel like, if you believe that by doing so you are providing a service to the Wikipedia readers.

My further advice to you is that you should NEVER write a message to any registered user invoking rules that do not exist and that you are unable to cite. You statement that a merger proposal has no function without an accompanying discussion is FALSE. Proof?


 * 1) It made you write that message to me, wich
 * 2) made me write a brief justification, and
 * 3) compelled me to give you a piece of my mind, hoping that you’ll learn something from the experience (better now and here, than on the job, believe me!)

Further evidence?

What you find in Merging_and_moving_pages is After proposing the merger, place your reasons on the talk page. That is not QUITE the same thing as you wrote. Although the editor of that phrase, obviously, left out the word PLEASE, it is clearly assumed that whoever made the proposal is interested in invoking a response and proceed with the merger. Well, I’m NOT. If I was, I would have proceed with it, as explained on the same Wikipedia page. As it is also made plainly clear there, I do NOT need to discuss that with you or anybody else, much less ask for your or anybody else’s permission to do it.

Being a student of Business Administration, a native speaker of English, having studied logistics and economics, whose main areas of interest on Wikipedia are within transport (including rail transport, aviation, public transport and shipping) it baffles me that you had to ask ME for a reason to merge those two articles. You ought to know that yourself.

Furthermore, you might consider changing that link on your user’s page from shipping to ship transport. Just a thought. Rest assured that my happiness does not depend on you doing it or not.

Good luck in your studies. Take as much advantage of them as you can (one final, unsolicited but also free advice).

Best regards,

Virgilio A. P. Machado

vapmachado talk.cw 00:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Storegut
Thanks for pointing that out, especially since that update had one of my own hooks in it as well!

The problem is that User:Bedford has not been archiving the previous hooks when he posts an update. I don't know why he is not doing this, I'll have to have a word to him about it. Regards, Gatoclass (talk) 06:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Norsk Transport
WOW. In one edit! Rettetast (talk) 20:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Interview with Åse Kleveland
The English Wikinews is going to be organizing an interview with the former Norwegian Culture Minister Åse Kleveland. She was also the head of the Swedish Film Institute and is now the chairwoman of the Norwegian Humanist Association. I am asking Wikipedians from all of the Scandinavian languages to contribute questions to her upcoming interview with Wikinews in Oslo. The page is here; please leave questions there and comments to me either on my en.wikinews talk page or my en.wikipedia talk page. Thank you very much! Mike H. Fierce! 02:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Whenever you have a chance to respond to me, please do. :) Mike H. Fierce! 04:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but I have no questions to ask Kleveland. Her fields of expertise are not within my fields of interest. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  10:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable images
Image:Statkraft_Smøla_Step_1.jpg and Image:Statnett_Follo_Trafo.jpg have been tagged as replacable. You know the drill if you want to dispute it. Rettetast (talk) 16:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, they were both from press kits of Statnett and Statkraft, and I am sure they are replaceable. I uploaded them back when I was a n00b here ;) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  20:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Stor-Oslo Lokaltrafikk
I have nominated stor-oslo lokaltrafikk for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  20:58, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Lommedalsbanen
Have you heard about Lommedalsbanen? Not a real railway, but do you think it deserves a page? And what, would you reckon, is the notability criterion for tunnels? A certain length? Thanks, Punkmorten (talk) 08:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The general consensus is that any railway station ever served by scheduled traffic is notable. I would consider Lommedalsbanen a museum, so follow WP:ORG—two news hits and its notable; I can find 20 on Sesam. Tunnels are trickier, i guess you could go by WP:N and try to find two RS, but the best things is to just use common sense. A 1 km tunnel would be notable, while a 25 m would not i guess. My impression of AfD discussions is that infrastructure is little contested are rarely is deleted. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  10:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Kystekspressen
There is a request for a new hook to your Kystekspressen DYK nomination.Template_talk:Did_you_know Please reply to the request. Thanks. - GregManninLB (talk) 15:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for informing me! I'm new to wikipedia and of course i can do something wrong. I'll try to improve myself more.. --Aegean Boy (talk) 14:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Riksvei
Hi Arsenikk. Being an authority on Norwegian transport articles and all, could you do something with Riksvei? That's something we're lacking. Manxruler (talk) 18:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Stub tag on a redirect
Regarding this edit, I read in a guideline somewhere that it might be helpful to stub tag a "redirect with possibilities", to attract editors to expand the stub. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 20:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, if you say so; I have never come across a stubbed redirect before, or heard of that, but then again I by far know all policy on Wikipedia. Thanks for letting me know. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There are far too many instructions in Wikipedia. I came across that one almost by chance a few days ago, though I have a suspicion I may have misinterpreted it.  If you agree that it would be useful to attract transport editors to this 3 line stub section on a moderately notable logistics business, then retag it. If not, fine. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Congestion pricing
First, I want to thank you for the review and the great job you did in improving the article to become GA. Also, I want to apologized for not contributing in this phase, but when I nominated the article I did notice there was a backlog of several weeks, so I mistakingly assumed I would be back in time from vacations to contribute in the editing. I really learn a lot from your review, and I will try to do future edits considering the standard you introduce in the article. Thanks again. Mariordo (talk) 13:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for contributing to the good article in the first place. There is still more to be done with congestion pricing, and with some work it may be heading for FA one day. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  06:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Smedvig_West_Epsilon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Smedvig_West_Epsilon.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 17:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Valdresbanen template
Your template for this line is clearly better than the table I initially inserted. Is there any way we can adapt the template so that we can include all the information in the table? --Leifern (talk) 15:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Take a look at Route diagram template, where the documentation for the trail templates are located. I do not see any immediate way of including all the information though, as the trail template is mainly for highlights. Personally I just copyedited the template from the Norwegian article. One suggestion could be to make articles for each station, even if they become stubs. At current, all stations, current or closed, are presumed notable. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  06:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Norway
Thanks for that catch, I must have forgotten to update that. Cirt (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, nice, looks like you have some DYKs that I haven't yet added to Portal:Norway/DYK, I will have to get on that soon. Nice work! Cirt (talk) 20:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, if you notice any Norway-related DYKs that are missing from Portal:Norway/DYK, feel free to make a note of it at Portal talk:Norway and I will do my best to update it and add those DYK articles' hooks into the rotation as well. Cirt (talk) 11:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I shall do my best. Thanks for looking after the Norway portal; it is most appriciated :) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  11:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

My pleasure. :) Cirt (talk) 11:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikimania 2010 could be coming to Stockholm!
I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 11:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:WikiProject Norse history and culture
Hi! I've left a message on the project talk, but thought, since the talk isn't particularly active, that I'd send out a few talk page messages as well.

Basically, I've taken on the WikiProject section of the Signpost, and would like to interview everyone about WP:WikiProject Norse history and culture, preferably on the talk page. I'd then edit it down a bit into a newspaper-style article, and link the original discussion at the bottom.

If you'd be interested in participating, could you let me know, either on my talk page, or at the Wikiproject's? Thanks!

Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Choice of word
Hi! An edit you reverted wasn't really "vandalism", but on the contrary a case of following WP:BLP policy.. The better solution, of course, was to actually reference it, like you did, but preferably without the word "vandalism". Otherwise, keep up the good work. Punkmorten (talk) 20:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Right'o. Thanks for the advice :) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

British Bangladeshi
Hi there, I nominated the article British Bangladeshi some time ago as a Good Article, and would you be able to please review the page to see whether it falls into the criteria, or Review the page. Thank you. M Miah (talk) 12:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Ekeberg Line
I just verified your DKY fact about Ekeberg Line and then noticed that if I am reading your article right, it should read 'used to use' instead of uses as your article says that it went back to 600 volts in 1974? Just wanted to make sure it was correct.
 * Thank you for finding that typo—I have changed to the wording in the nomination. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Dundas Valley Conservation Area DYK
Hi Arsenikk. That's odd, as you were put into the credits as the creator! Sorry about that, and thanks for letting me know. :) Best, PeterSymonds (talk)  11:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Angel Medflight
I removed the Speedy delete tag on technical grounds. It cannot be deleted as recreated if it was speedy deleted before - it has to have gone through a deletion debate at AfD to qualify. I think PROD is the correct way to go with this. Rmhermen (talk) 22:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I was unsure about the procedure—thank you anyway :) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  22:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

SR N15X class image concern resolved.
After consulting a few people also on the railways projects, I can now say with some justification that the image is now in the Public Domain. --Bulleid Pacific (talk) 11:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Great :) I wasn't trying to be mean or anything, but the image criteria for the GA are rather brutal, and it just seemed a little fishy ;) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  11:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Is it possible for you to finish the review, or are there still a couple of issues that need focussing on?--Bulleid Pacific (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * See the review page. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  13:06, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Appreciate the star. Just trying to do a good job and make a contribution. <font color="#3950A5" size="1">|► <font color="#000070">ϋrban <font color="#4D4D4D">яenewaℓ • <font size="0" color="#BFA137">TALK  <font color="#3950A5" size="1">◄| 00:12, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter
Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Tibet
Hi Arsenikk. Nice work on those DYK's and your work on Norwegian railways. I was wondering if you and somebody could give a hand starting this fr:Portail:Tibet  from french wikipedia? <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">The Bald One     <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat 18:53, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK

 * A good reward for adding one sentence and a reference to an article! :) Punkmorten (talk) 21:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, this was an easy one. Though I did actually reference the sentence, I stole the fact and the reference from the update to the Coastal Administration article update that I think you did. So thanks for doing all the work, Morten :) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Names
I was wondering; why is the article called Norwegian National Rail Administration (English), but another Norges Statsbaner? There is also Posten Norge and perhaps others. Punkmorten (talk) 21:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The logic I have been following (I have not named neither NSB or Posten, but I agree with the current naming scheme) is that companies (i.e. AS) are named with their original name, while government agencies (such as the rail administration) is named for the official English name (since almost all government agencies have official translations). This is my personal interpretation of WP:Use English. While this works for companies like say Norsk Hydro and Norsk Skog (we don't translate the article names into Norwegian Hydro or Norwegian Forest Industries), I agree that this is problematic for government agencies organized as limited companies. I notice NRK is named Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (though an AS), so at present this scheme is not implemented consistently. I would not oppose NSB and Posten changing to English names, though. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:27, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Your fixing the BS collapsing problem
It's just because I feel I'm responsible for the mass resivion to the BS collapsible templates, what if other users don't comprehend the change and just sit and watch their route template messed up by my updated template syntax. Luckily it isn't too much to rewrite and I'm free today. If you've got other questions, don't hesitate to ask in Wikipedia talk:Route diagram template or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains, I've watched both.

As for your Bergensbanen, I have revised sth on the Voss ~ Kvålsåsen-tunnelen part for better transition from BS5 to BS2. And the Bergen part, you used KBFe rather than BHF, if you do it for some reason it doesn't matter. Just my own curiosity. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 09:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Rapid transit GAN
I have reviewed your Good article nomination of rapid transit and have placed the article on hold. The primary reason is the lack of references in the safety and security section in the article. For further details, see the review page. I look forward to seeing the issues resolved. Thank you. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 17:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. The matter will be dealt with at the first opportunity. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  19:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the quick response. I feel that you handled the points I raised and hence I have passed the article. Again, thank you and keep up the good work. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AirAland logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:AirAland logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for the help with the newspaper stubs. By the way, rumor has it that a future work about Norwegian press history contains information on all former and present newspapers in Norway. Punkmorten (talk) 09:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem—just happy to help. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  09:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Njörðr GA review
Hello Arsenikk, thanks for taking the time to review the Njörðr article. However, something seems to have gone wrong in the process.. The Ask and Embla first review is there instead of a new Njörðr review. bloodofox: (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hm, this is what happens when one tries to take shortcuts by copy and pasting stuff ;) Seems someone fixed it up though. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  16:35, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AirFinland logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:AirFinland logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Beecher's Handmade Cheese GA
Hi! I made the requested changes to Beecher's Handmade Cheese, from <span style="color:#0D670D; font-family:Georgia, Helvetica;">rootology ( C )( T ) 19:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Just a note, when you build an articlehistory, you can scroll to the bottom of the talk page when you're finished to see if the red articlehistory category is lit up. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 23:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the advice :) sorry for getting that wrong. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  23:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Tory Burch GA
How is it now?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Norway
Thank you for keeping an eye on Portal:Norway and for updating it with Oslo T-bane - and nice job getting that article to WP:GA-status! Just a quick note, when adding new selections to Portal:Norway/Selected article, the "caption" field should not be wikilinked - it only specifies what shows up as rollover-text when you roll the mouse over the image itself. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 21:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice :) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries. Cirt (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Grakallbanen logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Grakallbanen logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:11, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Lost in translation
Hi, thanks for fixing up the spelling in List of Norwegian ministries. However, your semi-automatic editing was "spell checking" the Norwegian language versions of the department names, which uses departement (the correct spelling in Norwegian), and then "fixing" them into the English department. I have reverted the edit, but please be weary of this pit in the future. Thanks, and happy editing. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  17:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I was actually looking at for a while before saving, but they should be warped in a lang if they are in another language.  I had thought departement was English and the translation is parenthesis next to it which was why I committed the edit.  — Dispenser 18:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No, one {lang} for each line would look hideous. The least you can do before reading/editing a table is glancing at the column header. And to you Arsenikk, thanks. Punkmorten (talk) 19:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Constantine I GA review
I believe I've addressed your concerns. Geuiwogbil (Talk) 19:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Mobility (Military) categorisation
I reverted your removal of this article from the category, but I see the problem. Firstly there is no sub-category for Category:Military transportation, and secondly the current stub fails to mention that mobility can be strategic and operational, relying substantially on civilian networks and infrastructures. Indeed this reliance is complete in terms of rail and road movement, and substantial sea-cargo movements. I will earmark the article for needing expansion. Cheers--mrg3105 (comms) ♠ ♥ ♦ ♣ 01:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Translation
Thanks for the translation! Greatly appreciated. WLU (t) (c) (rules - simple rules) 20:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Logo right.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo right.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

???
How is the Washington DC Metro not considered a hybrid? The BART is also there and I wouldn't consider that a hybrid either
 * A hybrid is a commuter rail that has so many of the elements of a rapid transit, that it could be characterized as either. This involves both operating long distances with long intervals between stops (so long that there are locations along the route not in walking distance to any station, usually more than 2 km between most stations), but with the high frequency (four or more services per hour) and often zone-fare structure of a rapid transit. I have taken the Washington Metro, and it is not a hybrid. I have not taken the BART, so I don't know about it (this was someone else' edit). The German S-Bahn is the ideal example of a hybrid. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  09:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

What to call it?
Hi. This time is the Regjeringsadvokaten. I called it the Solicitor-General of Norway, but that name yields no google hits. Any idea? Punkmorten (talk) 09:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * According to regjerningen.no, it is called the Office of the Attorney General. I guess that makes it the Attorney General of Norway or something then. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  15:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ofotbanen logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ofotbanen logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Edward M. Cotter (fireboat)
Thanks for reviewing this article! I've begun making the changes that you've recommended and it should be completed soon. Shinerunner (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think all the necessary changes have been made. When you have time please take a look. Thanks! Shinerunner (talk) 22:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review and assistance with this article! Shinerunner (talk) 23:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Just happy to help out :) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  06:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Melbourne Airport Your Comments
Hello, it has come to my attention you are the one who passed Melbourne Airport to GA. I am going to conduct a Copyedit on this article, I would wish know what areas need the most work so I can focus my efforts there instead of searching through the wrong sections. -Marcusmax (talk) 22:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but it is so long ago that I cannot remember that sort of detail. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No prob I figured it out for myself. -Marcusmax (talk) 00:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Pedra Branca, Singapore GA review
Sorry, didn't realize you'd replied to my comments on 21 September. Give me a few more days to work on the article. Thanks. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 19:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem, just take the time you need :) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  19:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, have finished making additional changes and responding to your comments. I realized that while the article itself was on my watchlist, the GA review page wasn't! I shall have to remember to add GA review pages on to my watchlist now that the practice is to use them and transclude them on to article talk pages. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 04:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Railway lines
I see you've renamed the Norwegian lines again. Like I found when we discussed this at Talk:Jærbanen, there are official translations used by NSB, like the Jæren Railway for Jærbanen and the main Railway for Hovedbanen. Instead of creating new ones, like the Jær Line or the Hoved Line, we should use NSB's translations when in need for English names. Btd (talk) 10:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll have to second this - made-up, unofficial translations are something we want as little as possible of in the English Wikipedia. Official English names should be used where available, such as in this case, and if they aren't available, we should look to other reliable sources for names to use. Finally, if the reliable sources use the native Norwegian name, or there are no reliable sources in English that discuss the topic, the Norwegian name should be used. Please see Naming conventions (use English). --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 11:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See this debate at Talk:Bergen Line for the rationale. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  11:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, but Jærbanen should be moved to Jæren Line and Hovedbanen to Main Line (something). Preferrably without capitalized "l" since JBV tend not to use that. Btd (talk) 11:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I have now read that discussion, but I'm afraid I still disagree. You use the word "indicates" a little too much - just because Jernbaneverket calls other lines "X Line" in English doesn't mean anything for Bergensbanen. Contrary to what you seem to think, consistency is not more important than choosing a proper name for each article. And while "line" is perhaps a better translation of "bane" than "railway", that should be entirely irrelevant to us. After all, our job is to reflect reliable sources, not choose the more "correct" name. I have, however, noted that "Bergen Line" is also used occasionally on NSB and Jernbaneverket's websites. But as "Bergen Railway" is used at least as often, that's not a reason to name the article "Bergen Line". --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 11:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Trondheim Central Station
The article Trondheim Central Station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Trondheim Central Station for things needed to be addressed. Million_Moments (talk) 20:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Perm Airlines logo.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Perm Airlines logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 02:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Sjømannskirken or the Norwegian Church Abroad?
Hi, Arsenikk. Do you think that Sjømannskirken should be moved to Norwegian Church Abroad? The latter seems to be the official English name and as the rules state we should use English names on English language Wikipedia. Thought I'd ask for your opinion before moving the article. Manxruler (talk) 09:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like the official name, so then it should be moved per WP:UE. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  11:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep. That's what I thought too. I'll move it now. Manxruler (talk) 12:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Ihlen
Hi! I made the article Wincentz Thurmann Ihlen to go with the interesting person Nils Claus Ihlen (expanded as well). Nice, huh? I borrowed some text from the by you written Strømmens Værksted. Perhaps you could improve Wincentz Thurmann Ihlen by giving the text a reference? Punkmorten (talk) 22:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Good work! This Nils Claus guy seems to be quite the diplomat—and should probably be considered one of the greatest heroes of the nation if he was instrumental in keeping Norway neutral during the war (while we [or a bunch of shipping magnates] made a fortune on shipping). I have added ample references to Wincetz Thurmann's article, and at 1700 characters it should be long enough for DYK. Could you please do the nomination—I always seem to make really bad hooks and get a mob the nomination complaining about them. Thanks. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  22:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Lovely referencing and expansion! Isn't it cool how, one week ago, Wincentz Thurmann was just a name in a text, and suddenly we discovered enough material for him to have his own article? As always, a pleasure cooperating with you. I submitted a hook for DYK, perhaps you could [[Image:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] DYKtick it, haha :) Punkmorten (talk) 17:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Um, ticking it doesn't sound very kosher, but I guess the point is to have two people testimony to the verifiability. Thanks for finding a hook—I was just staring blindly in despair at the article when you wrote your note. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  18:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The part about you verifying Wincentz was intended as a joke... but thanks anyway, not the least for ticking Tove Strand and the others. Punkmorten (talk) 11:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

By the way I noticed your signing up for the good company! I take it you were attracted by the exciting task list I set up :) Punkmorten (talk) 17:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I dread the list of undone Norwegian articles. Of course some editors feel it is more important to prioritize each of the 100+ stations on the T-bane over major organizations that have influenced the Norwegian society for generations. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  18:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh well, stations are important too! Speaking of that I wish there existed some good sources on tramway stations. The suburban stations, at least, can be likened in importance to the t-bane stations. Punkmorten (talk) 11:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * There are some books written on these lines (Lilleaker and Ekeberg), but I have never come across them in any library I frequent (especially not the one in Koblenz, but also the ones in Bergen and Trondheim are rather bad at this topic). If these mention the stations in any detail, is another matter. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk  <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  20:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Just when I thought family ties couldn't be more complicated... Punkmorten (talk) 19:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Haha, great :) I am glad you can keep track of this, and have written articles on [almost] all the members of this large family of politicians and servant-holders. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  20:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Avinorlogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Avinorlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Flying Blind, Flying Safe
I replied to your comment at T:TDYK about this hook, I removed the word "highly" from the hook - the hook size should be fine now. Can you revisit and see if you can confirm it for possible use? Thank you, Cirt (talk) 09:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Cirt (talk) 04:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Arsenikk! I placed Gardermo Line on hold, as there are a few issues that need to be addressed. (not tooooo many =]) Anyway, the GA review can be seen here. Good luck, and if you need any help, feel free to ask! Cheers, &mdash;<font face="Monotype Corsiva"> the _ ed 17  &mdash; 17:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of comparison table
Hi there, bit cheesed off that you deleted my table! There was a lot of work in it and I believe it was offering a different perspective to the basic "list of Rapid Transit Syetems". I know you were acting in good faith so hence this comment. I would ask you to re-consider your deletion please as this table is aimed at highlighting different issues to those in the main table you refer to (which in fact does NOT include some systems and obviously does not include large cities which do not have rapid transit).

many thanks arsenikk signed mapmark 12 Oct 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapmark (talk • contribs) 14:39, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * See reply on Talk:Rapid transit. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  18:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Prithu and Krishna
Thanks for review, your concerns are addressed.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick response and pass.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 15:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You are most certainly welcome. I am working on Krishna now—should be reviewed soon. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  15:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review of Krishna, it will take at least 4 days to rectify the problems, a little busy tomorrow.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 16:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. We all have more important things to do than edit Wikipedia ;) <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  16:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Have addressed your concerns. Please take a look at Krishna. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the pass.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 13:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Scuba
Thanks for joining the project, I hope you'll enjoy working with us to improve diving-related articles. Noting your interest in GUE, you might want to look at User:Legis/GUE. Hopefully we can merge the two together and make sure the article stays undeleted this time! Cheers --RexxS (talk) 22:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

The New York Times
Wow that was fast. Thanks! Gary <b style="color:#02b;">King</b> ( talk ) 18:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Lake dab
Please see WP:LAKES --Docu (talk) 20:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Impeachment (Norway)
I used the citation from this article for a new hook, about Johan Henrik Rye Holmboe. Thanks for digging up the reference in advance :) Also, when writing biographies of politicians from this period, one finds they're often closely tied to railway history. You're interested in that, if I'm not mistaken. Baard Iversen with the Dovre Line, Anton Johan Rønneberg with the Rauma Line etc. Punkmorten (talk) 20:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Received email?
Hi Arsenikk. I sent you an e-mail via "E-mail this user" timestamped "Sat 10/11/08 5:25 PM". Could you perhaps check and see if it got stuck in a spam filter? Cheers. H aus Talk 00:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Semantic question
Hi! Isn't it really incorrect to call the Norwegian Parliamentary Ombudsman for the Armed Forces a government agency, it having no connection to the executive branch? Punkmorten (talk) 21:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The term government has a somewhat broader scope than the Norwegian regjering; though the executive branch is also called a government, the term can be coined to apply to the whole system of the state. I would argue you could call the ombudsman a government agency, since you could say that the legislative branch was also part of the government, interpreted the word a wide sense; or you could choose to call it only an agency, by choosing to use government in the narrow sense. Either way I wouldn't worry too much about it. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  15:38, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Atmosphere of Jupiter/GA1
I believe the issues were solved. Nergaal (talk) 01:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nordlandsbanken logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nordlandsbanken logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Scout Moor Wind Farm
I think we've fixed all the points you mentioned now. Could you take another look at it? Richerman (talk) 12:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Excellent, thanks very much for your help. Richerman (talk) 13:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Aker Solutions
Hi! I have some questions pertaining to Aker Solutions, and you seem to know this corp well.

I'm having a hard time finding out what happened to Kværner Eureka&mdash;the last "known" successor company of Thune (which I by the way expanded). I found a brochure from its time under that name, registered at the adress Joseph Kellersvei 20, Tranby. After the rename of Aker Kværner to Aker Solutions, things get more blurry.

Kværner Eureka was apparently disestablished in 2006, but in 2007, "Aker Kværner på Tranby" was apparently refurbished with a NOK 60 million investment. The latter link says that the company "Kværner Eureka på Tranby, som bedriftene het tidligere" had been "completely rearranged", but did not mention anything about weapons&mdash;the main focus of the brochure.

On the old adress in Tranby is now registered a company named Aker Subsea, which also has localities in Ågotnes ("Service") and Moss (whereas the "Business area staff" are located at its central HQ in Fornebu), as well as abroad.

Should Aker Subsea be considered a direct successor of Kværner Eureka? And what does the company really do? Punkmorten (talk) 00:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Nice work with Thune. What I think has happened, is that Kværner Eureka has been closed, but the facilities have been taken into use by Aker Subsea for manufacturing. Aker Subsea seems to be a global operation, and a fairly large part of Aker Solutions' operations (oil platforms are becoming more and more pure subsea installations, for instance Snøhvit). I do not know if you can call Aker Subsea a successor of Kværner Eureka, but perhaps you can say that they use the same facilities, or something. If you look at the organizational chart and the page on the subsea division, Tranby seems to be only one of many locations of the division. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  11:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Iole
Comment to your remark added to GA #2 Iole Talk Page. Besides those already listed, please add any additional improvements that can be made to perhaps bring this to GA status someday. I realize that there are a lot of other important tasks to attend to on Wikipedia besides the Iole article. Lately I have added a few DYKs to Wikipedia to improve the online encyclopedia. Perhaps I can make some of these GAs. Please feel free to make any improvements to any of these new articles or make comments to their Talk Pages.--Doug Coldwell talk 19:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I personally believe bringing articles up to GA standards is among the most noble deeds performed by Wikipedians (along with simply referencing articles), as it is the most efficient way to establish a high level of article quality (far more time-efficient than for instance FA or A). Simple articles, such as Iole, are easy (relative to, for instance, the mythology article) to bring to this level. My comments made during the GA #2 were extensive, i.e. if they had all been addressed during the initial week of the review, I would have passed Iole. My main comments were regarding that entire sections (notably on interpretation) were lacking (and still are), as well as some lack of references (which are now in place). The Iole article was good enough that it was a valid candidate for GA, but unfortunately the issues addressed in the review were not worked with. If you feel you or others have since addressed them, feel free for a new nomination. However, I will not attempt to fill the gaps myself, as mythology is a subject I do not feel comfortable writing about, as I am little familiar with its details. If you want me to quality check it before a nomination, feel free to ask, though I may be gone for many consecutive days several times this side of New Year's. Good work with the DYKs and Iole, and happy editing. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  20:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Det Norske Veritas logo.gif)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Det Norske Veritas logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

This discussion might be of interest to you.
Hi Arsenikk. I think you might find the current move discussion over at this page interesting and that you may have some input to contribute. Manxruler (talk) 16:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Star Shipping
A tag has been placed on Star Shipping requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 11:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Travel
About defining travel. I'm surprised you reverted my edit. The scholar referenced cites an abundant literature, and comes to a succinct definition. Whereas 'movement' is simple physical displacement, 'travel' is embedded in complex social practices. This is a short, useful observation, backed up by sociological knowledge. What an encyclopedia needs, I'd have thought?86.139.108.172 (talk) 18:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Arsennik, you need to read the research on which D-F's statement builds: James Buzard and Tzvetan Todorov are accepted authorities in the field of travel theory. His statement simply builds on theirs. It is scholarly synthesis, not metaphor. Have you studied their approaches to the problem? On what other scholarly authority are you proceeding?86.139.108.172 (talk) 21:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eltek logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eltek logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Energiselskapet Buskerud logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Energiselskapet Buskerud logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kongsberg Automotive logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kongsberg Automotive logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Political Appointments System in Hong Kong
How goes the review for Political Appointments System in Hong Kong? If the nominator (or anyone else) never tried to address the POV concerns in all of this time, I think it is safe to fail the article. They can always renominate at another time, although if the concerns haven't been addressed by now, they probably will never be. The article has been in the backlog for almost 100 days... <font color="Teal">Nikki <font color="Salmon">♥ <font color="Purple">311 23:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Luftfartsverket_Norway_logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Luftfartsverket_Norway_logo.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 05:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Follo Line
Hello! Your submission at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 18:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Golden_Ocean_Group_logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Golden_Ocean_Group_logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang (talk) 03:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

GA review of Marketing performance measurement and management
Heya! Thanks for reviewing Marketing performance measurement and management. I've replied to the prose. Could you let me know if it now meets the GA criteria? Zithan (talk) 18:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

References for Det Stavangerske Dampskibsselskap
An article you created, Det Stavangerske Dampskibsselskap, was tagging for lacking references in January 2008 by a Wikipedia editor. The article currently has zero references, zero external links, etc... The article appears to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements WP:ORG/WP:Notability to an extent sufficient that I will not nominate it for deletion, but if you have any sources for the material in the article I'd ask that you please add them with appropriate footnotes. Thanks, and have a great day! Jo7hs2 (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Fritt Ord logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Fritt Ord logo.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 22:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

No content in Category:1784 in transport
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:1784 in transport, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:1784 in transport has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:1784 in transport, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Political Appointments System in Hong Kong
Please refer to my posting at Talk:Political Appointments System in Hong Kong/GA1, thanks. Ohconfucius (talk) 07:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Norges Bondelag logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Norges Bondelag logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Norsk Hydro logo 1972-90.gif)
You've uploaded File:Norsk Hydro logo 1972-90.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Norwegian Petroleum Directorate logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Norwegian Petroleum Directorate logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Norwegian Pollution Control Authority logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Norwegian Pollution Control Authority logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Odda Rutebuss logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Odda Rutebuss logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 20:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Riksantikvaren logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Riksantikvaren logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Ruter logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Ruter logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 15:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Saga Petroleum logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Saga Petroleum logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Scandinavian Bunkering logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Scandinavian Bunkering logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 21:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Sloatsburg metro-north GAN
All done. It's a waiting for you. Mitch 32 ( Go Syracuse ) 23:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Flekkefjord Station
I'd like to see a clarification in the article. It makes no mention of the claimed fact it was a passenger line as stated in the DYK hook. - Mgm|(talk) 13:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

Newest development
He's from Trondheim and was involved in railway transport. Also, I expanded Namsos Line, but I don't really understand "skinner med en vekt på 35 kg/m". Perhaps you could help by writing it out properly (cf the "clarify" tag). Punkmorten (talk) 12:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice work on both articles. I'm glad other people are also taking an interest in rail transport ;)
 * As for the track weight, I think it is fairly well explained in rail profile. Perhaps I'm too into this stuff, but track weight is simply the weight of the steel used per meter. The larger the tracks, the more they weight, but the higher axle load they permit, thus allowing heavier trains. These days 35 kg/m is what is used on tramways, while I think Jernbaneverket uses 60 kg/m on new track. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  17:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. By the way: while Worm (nice homograph BTW) tried to stop railway lines from being built, his brother was the director of NSB! (not sure which years though). Punkmorten (talk) 19:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi again. It's about Ferdinand Bjerke. The article says he was "leading the work on the Flåm Line". Contrary, says that "Bygginga av Flåmsbana starta i 1923 under leiing av overingeniør Peder Lahlum, som tidlegare hadde hatt ansvaret for Voss-Evangerbanen. Lahlum hadde anleggsansvaret heilt til 1935. Då overtok avdelingsingeniør Adolph M. B. Kielland fram til 1942, og derfrå til anleggsslutt i 1947 avdelingsingeniør Rolf Aksnes." If they led the work, could the role of Bjerke please be clarified somewhat? Thanks (and thanks for creating it in the first place), Punkmorten (talk) 20:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The source text was a bit diffuse, and you are probably right, so I changed it to "senior engineer". That would cover up either way. Good spotting. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  21:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)