User talk:Art&concepts

Copyright problems with Eric Andersen (artist)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Eric Andersen (artist), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Eric Andersen (artist) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Eric Andersen (artist) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Whispe ring  08:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. tedder (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Natural art
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Natural art, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/articles/natural-art.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Richard Long (artist)
Hi, I saw you added an entry to the list of exhibitions for Richard Long. The list is much in need of attention as it is entirely uncited, and should probably be deleted unless suitable citations can be found. The list of places and dates is of little use unless there are links to web pages or books that actually describe the exhibitions - otherwise, it's a CV (not allowed on Wikipedia) or could be fiction (WP:OR, not allowed either). If you could add a few citations to the more important exhibitions, that would be much appreciated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:08, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Chiswick Chap (talk). Good point. Maybe the list is to long. The dates should be not reversed, however. I work with the field of Art and the tendency now, in catalogs and other printed publications, is to show the lists from the most recent to earliest. Show in Galeria Akumulatory 2 was an important one as it was in 1977, in Poland, the only solo show behind the Iron Curtain than. The ref. is taken from: http://www.zacheta.art.pl/en/article/view/928/beyond-corrupted-eye-akumulatory-2-gallery-1972-1990. Cheers

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)