User talk:Art at loggerhead

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.   ~ AdvertAdam   talk  03:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cheng Kun Chou


The article Cheng Kun Chou has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. RandomAct(talk to me) 03:17, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Just as a friendly reminder, the article you provide as a source does not mention Cheng Kun Chou by name anywhere. You should, if possible, provide a reliable source that supports the article RandomAct(talk to me) 03:43, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Isoje Chou for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isoje Chou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Isoje Chou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Banana (talk) 20:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ijosé Chow for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ijosé Chow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ijosé Chow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Ijosé Chow
I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article Ijosé Chow-- The information is presented clearly and is easy to understand. However, I noticed there are some holes that may need filling: the article does not contain Wikilinks, and so doesn't follow Wikipedia style guidelines.Amy Z (talk) 17:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Ijose Chow
Please do not edit Articles for Deletion pages after discussions have been closed. You may comment on talk pages or at Deletion review, but not on nomination pages. Thank you. Neutralitytalk 05:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Isoje Chou


The article Isoje Chou has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 02:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)