User talk:Artdotc

December 2019
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Cajón. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Very sorry about that. I'll take care for next time. Artdotc (talk) 15:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Drumming, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

But why i will be blocked. What thing i have done wrong. I'm just contributing to Wikipedia. If you don't want me to contribute then block me.☹️ Artdotc 16:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arthur Choo


A tag has been placed on Arthur Choo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 13:00, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Arthur Choo. Additionally, Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself. Praxidicae (talk) 13:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arthur Choo


A tag has been placed on Arthur Choo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://arthurchoo.com/about-me/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. David Biddulph (talk) 14:52, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Why?
Arthur Choo is a Singaporean musician. He is famous for his instrument the cajon. he is doing social works and helping poor and handicapped people in Singapore. I Artdotc want's to publish an article for his great efforts and social work. His contributions should be notable to the people and about him their should be an article on Wikipedia. I'm trying a lot to publish an article on his life but every time after publishing article (Arthur Choo) i'm getting notice that this article should be deleted under section G11. they are saying that i'm advertising in this article but i'm seriously not. I'm a confirmed user on Wikipedia, i know how to write an article and how to edit articles. Even if i upload an image of eminent personality Arthur Choo, i gotta notice that this image should be deleted. I click that image with my own camera, still they don't approve that image.

Wikipedia made me a confirmed user, that's great!, with this now i can create an article, move an article and upload media, this is only a joke with me. Still i'm unable to create articles and upload images. overall their is no use of my confirmed user. why Wikipedia isn't so smart and technical that it is unable to identify the point of view of my written article. There is no single medium of advertising and productivity in my article Arthur Choo. so please, it is a humble request to you, that let my article to be live on Wikipedia without any objections. and please contact me if you seriously found any mistake in my article(Arthur Choo), except deleting my article. Thanks Wikipedia confirmed User Artdotc Artdotc 14:52, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm David Biddulph. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Help talk:Talk pages have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. ''Your edit was totally irrelevant to the subject of that page, which is clearly laid out at the top of the page. '' David Biddulph (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Regarding your article
Hello.

I received your e-mail about Arthur Choo. Your actions lead me to believe you might have a conflict of interest. Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require that all editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which they receive, or expect to receive, compensation". For more information about paid editing, see the help pages as WP:PAID and WP:COI (also applies if you do not receive compensation but have other external relationship with the subject).

When you created the page, it was speedily deleted for two reasons: it seemed promotional and it contained copyright violations. You've been already explained why in the teahouse and at the helpdesk. Wikipedia articles need to maintain a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion.

Also, please note that autoconfirmed status is just used to prevents spambots and obvious vandalists from performing certain actions as easily. It's not an indication of an editor's skill level.

Best regards, Majavah (t/c) 19:21, 5 January 2020 (UTC)