User talk:Artemis Potter

Speedy deletion of Otaka's scoop
A tag has been placed on Otaka's scoop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Otaka's scoop
I have nominated Otaka's scoop, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Otaka's scoop. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Otaka's scoop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Peasantwarrior (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Otaka's Scoop
Hi. As it seems, argument which are you using is WP:OSE. That is proven to be a bad argument. Sorry, but you will not be allowed to put up any article that is an advertisment. If you have some suggestions how to make other articles (which you are reffering to as advertisments) better, discuss it on their talk page, mark it as advertisments, or be bold and change them into neutral point of view yourself. Thanks. Peasantwarrior (talk) 07:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Otaka's Scoop
A tag has been placed on Otaka's Scoop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Created, by alternate spellings, at least 3 times. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

And, do not remove speedy deletion templates from articles that you have created. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Reply to your comment on the deleted talk page
No, you didn't. You said "Otaka's blog is most popular among young readers", with the word "most". Now, that could mean it isn't popular at all, and that only 10 people read it, but 6 of them (the majority) are young. Please read our notability guideline and I'd suggest not re-creating the article again, unless you create it in a way that is acceptable per our guidelines, if that is possible as I don't believe this blog to be notable. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)