User talk:ArtesVisualesMexicanas

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Glassford (July 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Glassford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Thomas_Glassford Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Thomas_Glassford reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Qcne  (talk)  20:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi there,
 * Thank you so much for the help and for the update! Is there a way I can ask for a secondary review, since I know for a fact that the artist does qualify as someone with enough notability?
 * Perhaps I could add more references if of help!
 * Thanks so much! ArtesVisualesMexicanas (talk) 20:37, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @ArtesVisualesMexicanas. The sources do not yet prove that he meets the artist criteria unfortunately, some more sources would certainly help! The sources must be reliable, independent, provide significant coverage. Let me know if you have any questions?  Qcne  (talk)  20:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * (note, I wonder if you have gotten confused with our definition of "notability" and the more common definition of notability. The Wikipedia definition, which you can find at WP:NARTIST, explains how we apply it to drafts.)  Qcne  (talk)  20:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Thomas Glassford


The page Draft:Thomas Glassford has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.sicardi.com/artists/thomas-glassford. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion review. — Diannaa (talk) 12:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)