User talk:Artexetra

Interdisciplinary art-science curriculum
A "" template has been added to the article Interdisciplinary art-science curriculum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Captain  panda  01:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I composed an extensive reply to the discussion concerning the deletion of my article and made numerous changes. The article was deleted on June 26 by Sr13 with no rationale on his/her part and with no response to my reply or modifications. I spent quite a bit of time on this and if nothing else, I would like to get the content back so I can continue to improve the article and resubmit it. Thanks! ES


 * As near as I can tell, the article was a mere three sentences and then a whole lot of external links. The subject itself is original research and wholly unencyclopedic. IrishGuy talk 19:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. N.J.A.  &#124; talk  13:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

{{unblock-spamun|eshanken|From what I understand of 331dot's comments on 27 April 2021, since my account was compromised during a security breach, the account must remain blocked. Since it is blocked, I cannot change my password. Therefore, I must create a new account. The proposed account name is the first letter of my first name followed by my full last name. Please see my prior comments from April 2021 with respect to concerns related to my account logged by user NJA that triggered the block in 2019. Thanks. ES