User talk:Arteyu/Archive 1

Image
The image has to be low resolution because it's copyrighted and can only be used within strict guidelines (see WP:NFCC). Hut 8.5 18:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Northern premier league
Congratulations on orphaning all the team's logo's in your latest edits, you'll be glad to know that now they're all unused they'll be deleted in a week. Such fine editing.. 86.21.74.40 (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Manchester City F.C.
The takeover is not yet complete, as it is still undergoing due diligence. Oldelpaso (talk) 07:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Nicol David has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 04:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Rm...
Why have you removed your name from Jacks ABs. Chubb enna itor  17:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Swimmer
You have edited the Template:Infobox Swimmer. But when a swimmer hasn't won medals yet the infobox became twice as big as it should be with a big white sheet. Take a look at the following pages and you will see what i mean: Joeri Verlinden, Marieke Guehrer and Matt Jaukovic. Maybe you can fix this problem because it looks terrible this way. StevenZorn (talk) 09:52, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Joan Curry
Thank you for creating Joan Curry. Happy editing, Kingturtle (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Guyana-sport-bio-stub
Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  00:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * S'alright - at least the template is a sensible one. The category, though, is likely to stay small for a while so it may need to be upmerged for now. Grutness...wha?  08:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Tom Richards (squash player)

 * Good work on the squash articles, but could you check the above, there seems to be a naming issue? Thanks. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 10:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, an easy thing to do when using a template, as I assume you are. Good luck. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 10:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
For your recent additions of Indonesian actresses - please note the hnges made to the articles - they are stubs - thanks SatuSuro 01:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

AFC Wimbledon
Why did you make this move (AFC Wimbledon to A.F.C. Wimbledon) without discussion? As can be seen at #History, "AFC" does not stand for anything, specifically not for "Association Football Club". I suggest that you revert your change, at least pending consensus for it. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * In addition, please would you request the reversal of this renaming of Category:AFC Wimbledon players, which was also inappropriate. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 11:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know that the category has now been returned to its correct name, cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Coat of arms of Sabah.png
Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Sabah.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of South Kilburn F.C.
A tag has been placed on South Kilburn F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Macromonkey (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I flagged the article as it is not a notable club. I understand that a lot of work must have gone into it and apologise, i merely applied what i knew to the article. If you follow the instructions on the page, you can contest the deletion. I hope you realise i did not flag the article maliciously, I jsut patrol new pages. all the best, Macromonkey (talk) 22:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Hardwicke FC

 * Only trying to help! Paste  Let’s have a chat. 11:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, I thought you were mad at me! Happy editing! Paste  Let’s have a chat. 11:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jon Main
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jon Main, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Never played professional football.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 11:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jon Main
I have nominated Jon Main, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jon Main. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Franck Ribery
Hi, "excessively repeated reference" means "repeating the same citation over and over again, too much". I've restored the one against his height, because that isn't mentioned anywhere other than the infobox. But if you just have one citation at the end of the lead section, that will be enough referencing for the items in that paragraph, they don't need to be all cited individually. Also, the ESPN page cited doesn't give his place of birth or his full name, nor does it mention his debut or his goals in the Ligapokal. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Flag of Sabah 1963-1981.gif)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of Sabah 1963-1981.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Flag of Sabah 1982-1988.gif)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of Sabah 1982-1988.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Leicester City.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Leicester City.svg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Birmingham City F.C. infobox logo
Hi, I'm afraid I don't know what you mean by your edit summary "100px is too small and unviewable". Please remember that the page has to be viewed by users with a variety of screen widths: at 1024x768, for instance, the logo at 150px overwhelms the first page of the article. The fair use rationale states that "The logo is a size and resolution sufficient to maintain the quality intended by the company or organization, without being unnecessarily high resolution." The display size of 100px is plenty large enough to maintain the quality, as is illustrated by its having been displayed at that size without comment or complaint for the past two years to my knowledge. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, at that size and screen resolution, the infobox pushes into the body of the first section, which is presumably why you moved the first image away from where it logically belongs. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Luton Town F.C. infobox logo
Hi mate, the SVG does look nice, yes, but I'm afraid that the logo you put up is now out of date. If you have an SVG of the present logo, please upload it and it will be welcome.

Cheers, 0 0 0  Clifton  ian  0 0 0  11:00, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid the best image you can find on the net is the one on the Luton Town F.C. page. However, as you'll probably have noticed, the only difference is the "1885"… can you simply add the "1885" to the SVG you've already made?

IRC
Hi,

Just a quick note per our IRC chat; I thought it might be useful if I left some of the links we discussed here on your page for you.

Also, I've discovered some more information, which will clarify what happened.

Now that I've checked the logs of the file, I see exactly what you mean, and what has happened.

You can see from the logs;


 * You uploaded the file originally
 * then uploaded a new version (reduced size)
 * Andrew c then deleted the file, with the comment 'nonfree reduce replaceament'
 * Andrew c then uploaded a new file under the same name - thus creating a new page, with no history
 * You then changed the file used on Reading F.C. from Image:Reading badge.png to Image:Reading FC.svg with this edit

You are quite right in saying that this is only something an admin can do - ie the deletion part. You could achieve the same result yourself, by requesting a deletion etc...however, I'm not convinced that it's the best solution anyway. 'We' (Wikipedia) like to keep the associated history with pages, wherever possible.

Now - links;


 * Preparing images for upload
 * SVG Help
 * Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual/Formatting and Illustrating Articles/Adding Images
 * (In fact, the missing manual is good for lots of stuff)
 * WP:PUMP (for general discussion; if you want to ask about whether SVG is best for small logo's etc)

The 'retouched' tag;
 * Example of me using it; commons:File:243_ida_crop.jpg
 * The tag itself; template:RetouchedPicture
 * The syntax is;

I hope this helps;

If you do ever need help,
 * Leave a note on my talk page, or
 * Place in a new section at the end of this page, followed by your question, or
 * talk to us live.

Cheers!  Chzz  ►  11:54, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Zoo Fari  22:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Luton Town.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:Luton Town.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:46, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Dashes
Those symbols in the editing box are dashes. The one on the left (the smaller one) is an en dash, while the larger one next to it is an em dash. I don't think you can use the keyboard to type either dash into an article, but just clicking one of the symbols in the box will place it where the cursor is. WP:DASH has more information on proper usage of dashes; in Nicol David, the score ranges are correctly using en dashes. In several places, such as the Other Titles listing, I see spaced hyphens that should be changed to either spaced en dashes or unspaced em dashes. Hopefully this isn't too confusing, and I wish you luck in improving David's article.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 17:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Luton Town.svg
Hi,

Thanks for uploading this mate, but it just isn't needed in the Luton Town F.C. page. Just wanted to drop you a quick note to let you know why I removed it, it wasn't a personal slight on you.

Cheers, 0 0 0  Clifton  ian 0 0 0 17:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Sure thing mate. Cheers, 0 0 0  Clifton  ian 0 0 0 21:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Cheers fella, you're a pal. :) 0 0 0  Clifton  ian 0 0 0 10:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Reply
I made myself an alternative email for Wikipedia uses. Here it is: ZooFari-Wikipedia@hotmail.com  Zoo Fari  22:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, got the message. I made the soccer ball image with a transparent background, as you requested. I will begin working on the rasters, though I'm afraid I might not be able to vectorize some (because of quality). I will give it a shot though :) Zoo Fari  22:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Georgetown vs George Town revisited
You are invited to participate in a discussion at Talk:George Town, Penang. -- Tcncv (talk) 01:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Request at GL/I
--Goldsztajn (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've done a draft of the Australia request you made.--Goldsztajn (talk) 01:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've done the New Zealand version. --Goldsztajn (talk) 00:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
 Zoo Fari  04:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

dates
Hi, I noticed that you linked a date or two when you created Boy Meets Girl episodes. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Ohconfucius (talk) 07:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've never created or edited Boy Meets Girl episodes. You've sent the message to the wrong person Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 13:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I meant Laura Hill (squash player). Ohconfucius (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Holding back vectorizations
Hello Arteyu. I am already done with a few of your requests, but I'm holding it back till June, so you may not hear back from me for a week or so. Okay with you?  Zoo Fari  22:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Its okay with me Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 07:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Luton badge
Wonderful. Cheers fella, you're a pal. :)  Cliftonian  • talk  19:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem pal (: Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 10:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Manchester City Logo
Hi the manchester city logo you created appears to have been deleted and the reason given in the log was author request. Since you replaced the png version which was subsequently deleted, could you please reupload or request that the logo be undeleted. Paul   Bradbury 22:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again, I reverted your edits to the manchester city logo for a couple of reasons, firstly the new logo you uploaded is incorrect and I am not clear what you think is incorrect about the one that is there currently. Also I removed your speedy delete tag (that is how we got into a mess last time). Please do not upload to another name and then speedy the first image, by doing this you are erasing the file history and discussions about it. Paul   Bradbury 15:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

SVG Size
To me they seemed a little on the large size, given that fair use images are supposed to be as small as reasonably possible,(will consider de-tagging). The size reduction can easily be done by changing the nominal size in the SVG file IIRC.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, Have looked at the examples you mention, de-tagging pending further disscussions.


 * To me hi-res is anything over about 500x500 for square aspect ratio, and 640x480 in terms

of normal photos. In terms of logos I tend to think it should 'display' at about the same size as it would on a small enamled badge or cap patch, but this is ONLY a personal opinion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * SVG is a vector format that allows for infinite expansion of vector images, yes. They still, however, have to rendered, and that is where NFCC comes in. I am downsizing the image. <font face="Trebuchet MS">— <font color="#5A3696">neuro <font color="#5A3696">(talk) 11:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, Have checked the ones I tagged, Apart from the VERY large one you mention, all have apparently been de-tagged.

Having asked in the Wikipedia IRC channel, I've been told that SVG logos should ideally be downsized to meet the Non free criteria used. However, as SVG is an inherently scalable format so a downsized image would only affect the raster presentation of it, not the underlying image.

As a guide, in respect of future conversions somewhere around 400x400 is perfectly reasonable in terms of the 'raster' presentation of a vector image.

On a more positive note, you might want to check my contributions, I am sure there are some raster logos/crests of football clubs that need conversion, something you seem VERY good at :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Getting some odd errors with your SVGs (other ones work fine):

mogrify: Unescaped '<' not allowed in attributes value `No such file or directory` @ svg.c/SVGError/2549. mogrify: attributes construct error `No such file or directory` @ svg.c/SVGError/2549. mogrify: error parsing attribute name `No such file or directory` @ svg.c/SVGError/2549. mogrify: attributes construct error `No such file or directory` @ svg.c/SVGError/2549. mogrify: xmlParseStartTag: problem parsing attributes `No such file or directory` @ svg.c/SVGError/2549. mogrify: Couldn't find end of Start Tag g `No such file or directory` @ svg.c/SVGError/2549. mogrify: unable to extend cache `C:/DOCUME~1/Chris/LOCALS~1/Temp/magick-48MyAlsB ': Invalid argument @ cache.c/OpenPixelCache/3854.


 * Odd. <font face="Trebuchet MS">— <font color="#5A3696">neuro <font color="#5A3696">(talk) 11:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Your Logos Request
Hello, I told you earlier that I was going to hold your requests till June. The reason being is that I needed to update my Inkscape because the older version had issues with putting text on paths. I wasn't able to, so I unfortunately couldn't convert any. I have 4 done, but MediaWiki will not render the "rainbow text". If I convert to path, they misalign. It is a big mess with my stupid version, so your version will probably be better. Maybe request at GL if your versions still need fixing?  Zoo Fari  23:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, it's okay if you can't fix it, I'll try to ask another user about it. Anyway thanks for your help all this while  Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 10:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Manchester City Logo
Maybe you missed this higher up your page, so I'll repost it here

Hi again, I reverted your edits to the manchester city logo for a couple of reasons, firstly the new logo you uploaded is incorrect and I am not clear what you think is incorrect about the one that is there currently. Also I removed your speedy delete tag (that is how we got into a mess last time). Please do not upload to another name and then speedy the first image, by doing this you are erasing the file history and discussions about it. <font style="color:#AAD0FF;background:#fff;">Paul  <font style="color:#fff;background:#AAD0FF;"> Bradbury 16:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Reply from my talk page
I looked up in the policy section and I am wrong, you can delete from you own talk page. However it is considered bad form. Your talk page is an audit of your discussions and removing information especially warnings can leave future editors unaware of the discussion that you have had about a topic. In this instance removing the warning about removing speedy tags from your own articles. <font style="color:#AAD0FF;background:#fff;">Paul  <font style="color:#fff;background:#AAD0FF;"> Bradbury 18:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Please, your words annoys me! Welcome to Wikipedia? & WP:Introduction? What is that for? Do you think I'm a newbie? Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 18:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * It is a standard template, I didn't write it, it is used when good faith is assumed. <font style="color:#AAD0FF;background:#fff;">Paul  <font style="color:#fff;background:#AAD0FF;"> Bradbury 18:41, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, you don't seem to understand what I have done, I have not deleted the file, it is still there at File:Manchester City.svg I simply requested that the duplicate version you uploaded that does not contain the file history be deleted. You seem to not have read my message above. The issue is that you created a new version of the file and instead of uploading it as a revision you created a new file and requested deletion of the old file, this simply removes the edit history and is to be avoided. Your content is all still here and can be corrected if you think it is wrong (however despite my requests you have not indicated what is wrong). It has been a lot of work to correct the damage done by your edits across mulitple articles please try and be more careful in future. Also reply here instead of my talk page, I am watching this page and will respond back. <font style="color:#AAD0FF;background:#fff;">Paul  <font style="color:#fff;background:#AAD0FF;"> Bradbury 22:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, but you've requested the new file (the duplicated version) for deletion (I wanted the original to be deleted instead). There is no other contributor for the file except for me, if the file has another author/contributor, so I would not opted for deletion. The mistakes with the current logo (that has been reverted by you) is that it contains many small mistakes that can only be seen when you zoom on it (especially on the Superbia in Praelia word). I am currenlty requesting for it to be corrected at WP:GL/I. Please, this matter has been solved. I don't want to hear anything concerning to it again. Hope for your understanding. Thank you Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 22:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. Best of luck! Cheers, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

AJ Auxerre
Should have replaced the older AJ Auxerre.svg, rather than upload a new one... --Bolonium (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Not a problem - no need to apologize :P If that one is an updated version, it is better to keep it, after all.  Cheers, --Bolonium (talk) 23:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Penang
Hi Arteyu,

did the Penang request get resolved? I had a lot of trouble with the low-resolution of the source files, and it seems that someone else has now completed the task?

Thanks, --James Chenery (talk) 02:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I've been waiting for months but nobody wants to help me to convert it, but if the resolution of the image is low, can you try to convert this image and this image  instead (the data might be too complex but this is the finest and the most accurate map that I can find)? You can just ignore my request on WP:GL/I and convert this image instead. Pls tell me ASAP if you're interested, Thanks (:  Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 05:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

I am am currently trying to learn Adobe Illustrator on a demo copy, which will expire within two week, so I will give it a go, and if I can't do it, I will let you know. I have done a fair amount of vector work in the past with other packages, so hopefully it won't be a problem.

The low resolution of the other image frustrated attempts at auto-tracing. I ended up tracing half the map by hand. Are you attempting to get this article to FA?

--James Chenery (talk) 07:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Vfl Wolfsburg.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:Vfl Wolfsburg.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Png -> Svg
Please if you're going to make this type of change carry forward all the relevant category and other info from the original image. Thx. Wiggy! (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think so because i use different templates. You shouldn't copy the info from the PNG directly because the source and format is different. I also honestly don't think that you should remove the Template:SVG-Logo template from the file Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 19:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not about the file being an svg vs. a png. The original template included info about the club, the file, the origin of the file and all the necessary non-free image use tags. It also categorized the image as a German football logo. After the change, much of that information was gone and the file was incorrectly tagged as being an English football logo. I note also that the white circle which is an background element of the Wolfsburg file is now missing, replaced by a transparency which means the logo can display improperly in some contexts.
 * So why is this a big deal? There are policies and rules for the display of images on Wikipedia as I'm sure you're aware. What you did made the image non-compliant with those rules in some ways. I'm not a rule basher, but I've had enough run-ins with the sort that I try real hard to stick to the formula, to stay inside the rules and to avoid having to deal unnecessarily with the anti-image sorts. The non-free image use stuff supercedes tagging the image as an svg and bragging rights about who put the thing together.
 * I am also not aware of any compelling reason to change the files into svgs. The recommendation to do that to logos is long disappeared from the related WP logo guideline. The use of svgs for the purpose is the subject of some ongoing debate related to limits of image resultion under NFCC. Its also just more baiting of the anti-image sorts in this context. If you can point me to a clear policy on svg use and logos it would be helpful.
 * That said if you enjoy svgs, great. But, please don't make a mess of the related file information when you make a change and don't place the images at risk for no good cause. This isn't just a simple technical issue related to image formats, but is tied in with a bunch of other stuff as I've outlined here. Thanks. Wiggy! (talk) 19:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

"Taken from Help Desk". The image is a logo, so logo fur is more appropriate, but Non-free media rationale (which redirects to non-free use rationale) is not egregiously wrong, however information is more often used for free images. The image is being used in two articles, so you must have a rationale for each article. You can also use non-free image data and multiple non-free image rationale. BTW: the use of this non-free image is probably not appropriate for Fußball-Bundesliga 2008–09. ---— Gadget850 (Ed)   talk 20:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * And Wiggy!, try to take a look at the vfl wolfsburg official site, you can see that the PNG format of the logo is wrong, the white circle isn't there, the circle should be in transparent Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 08:01, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Manchester City.svg
I have uploaded a new version of File:Manchester City.svg as requested at Graphic Lab/Image workshop. Certes (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow! Thanks! Great job pal! Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 19:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * An easy one, as that was a very readable piece of SVG to start with. I just had to find the few fill="#000000" (black) paths, work out which was which and set the stroke width. Let's hope this version can be kept. Certes (talk) 19:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, i agree, it was a great work anyway, nice job. Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 19:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks guys this looks great <font style="color:#AAD0FF;background:#fff;">Paul  <font style="color:#fff;background:#AAD0FF;"> Bradbury 22:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Np pal Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 07:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Map
Hi Arteyu,

I have managed to vectorise the outline of the land, and its borders without any problems. The tracing software keeps producing nasty-shape madness whenever I try to trace the roads, rivers, etc. I think I will have to trace them by hand, which will take a long time, as I don't have a graphics tablet any more. :D I will spend some more time on it tonight.--James Chenery (talk) 03:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks for your help pal. Take your time, do them as you please. Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 06:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

My Adobe Illustrator demo has now expired, but I could download some of the free tools listed on wikipedia, if you need me to alter anything.

You can also post these SVGs up on the Graphic Lab request page, and ask one of the experienced guys to see if they can work a little magic on them, if you like. :D Actually, I have just noticed that on wikipedia, the N of "George Town" is behind the location circle - Ack! Opening the file again in Illustrator shows the words in the correct place, so I assume it is due to the renderer that Firefox is using? I will leave George Town where it is, for now, in case trying to fix it breaks the image for other browsers.

Thanks for being patient, --James Chenery (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow! It looks great pal! Although that it has mistakes, but I think it looks simply superb. Thanks pal for helping me to sort out this matter :D Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 16:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reminding me about the maps, and the barnstar. (*^_^*) Apart from the "George Town N" problem, did you find any other mistakes?  --James Chenery (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks perfect to me Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 19:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Can we mark this request as at WP:Graphic Lab/Image workshop?  Is WP:Graphic Lab/Map workshop resolved too? (User:Vrysxy has since made further updates.)  Certes (talk) 11:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

LTFC badge
Hi mate, just thought I'd drop you a line because somebody's throwing a hissy fit at FAC because the SVG badge is too big... could you please make it smaller for me? :) Cheers – Cliftonian the orangey bit 06:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You are a STAR! Cheers mate – Cliftonian the orangey bit 09:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome my friend. – Cliftonian the orangey bit 09:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * SVG/PNG – on copyrighted stuff, I believe that PNG is the better option. This is because an SVG can be scaled to whatever you like, meaning that you can easily reproduce from it and therefore infringe on copyright. On Wikipedia, we have to use a PNG to be able to claim it as Fair Use. You're a great guy, but on this occasion I'm afraid that both you and I were wrong. :( Best just to go along with it, if we make too much of a fuss we may get blacklisted – Cliftonian the orangey bit 13:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your opinion pal, the matter is currently being discussed here. Please feel free to give your opinions okay Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 21:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

How do I talk??
Hi Arteyu! I finally got to login to wikipedia. So sorry. I'm still not sure how I'm supposed to 'talk' to you. Is it like this?? Am I doing it right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmsiew (talk • contribs) 07:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Aha! Awesome. Thanks a lot. I'm still reading through the guides. Will get back to you soon :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmsiew (talk • contribs) 13:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

SVG and Fair USe
I'm not the best person to comment, and won't but some thoughts here anyway

- SVG can be rendered at any resoloution - Wikipedia chooses not to render fair-use SVG as hi-res., A user still has to download the SVG in order to get a hi-res version themselves. It could thus be argued that creation of the thus non-fair use image is NOT done by Wikipedia but by the downloader that re-generates it at hi-res.)

- Also Wikipedia makes plenty of warnings that an image isn't 'free' and certainly doesn't in terms of the context of use on wikipeida use an SVG fair use logo for commerical purposes. ( A downloader converting a 'fair-use' SVG would thus possibly be making thier own derivative, outside of 'fair-use' which could also be a copyvio.)

Other than that I don't fell I have enough knowledge to respond in the thread you pointed me at. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Julie Estelle
I deprodded this article that you started. To bolster it, could you add some more content and references? I'm hoping you understand Indonesian, as there are very few English language sources. Fences &amp;  Windows  17:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Luton Town.svg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Luton Town.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 01:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome!
How did you hear about our group? Welcome! I am really happy to see you joined us :) If you need help with an article, please let me know!

{| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

Coincidence
Is it just a coincidence that your name is similar to both the band Atreyu and the character Atreyu? Just curious :P <small style="background:#007FFF;border:#66FF00 2px dashed;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px"><font color="#66FF00"><font color="#66FF00">Bugboy52.4 | <font color="#66FF00">=-=  22:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Umm, I would answer yes! I've heard of Atreyu's song before but I'd never liked their song. It is merely a coincidence that their band name is similar to mine :X Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 15:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Guiseley.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Guiseley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vfl Wolfsburg.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Vfl Wolfsburg.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to AfC
Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Articles for creation! We are a group of editors who work together on the Articles for creation and Images for upload pages.

A few tips that you might find helpful:
 * Please take time to fully read the reviewers' instructions before reviewing submissions.
 * The project's discussion board is the best place to ask for help or advice. You might like to watchlist this page, and you are encouraged to take part in any discussion that comes up.

Once again, welcome to the project. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC) &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Article submissions that need reviewing can be found in Category:Pending AfC submissions and there is also a useful list which is maintained by a bot.
 * You might wish to add AFC status to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. There is also a project userbox. If you haven't done so already, please consider adding your name to the list of participants.
 * Several of our members monitor an IRC channel,, and you are most welcome to join in.

AfD nomination of Sharifah Sofia
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sharifah Sofia. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Sharifah Sofia. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Government-to-employees was created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Samwb123Please read 17:26, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would to help us improve this process, please consider

Account Creation Assistance
Requested an account on the ACC account creation interface. <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 00:54, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in as well as the mailing list.


 * Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day (a day being from 0:00 UTC to 23:59 UTC), although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed". However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM.


 * Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! ---- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 04:49, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rice. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yossiea <sup style="color:Green;">(talk) 17:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I suspect that there was an edit conflict while I'm using Huggle, and this may also caused by slow internet connection. I tried to revert it back, but you beat me to it. <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 17:49, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. I've been having problems with TW today, so it is very possible. Yossiea <sup style="color:Green;">(talk) 18:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your understanding. <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 18:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

 * No problem pal. What do you think about the templates that I've suggested? Do you think it should be created? I just need your approval to start working with it. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need my assistance. Cheers. <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 20:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Create them, no one will object. Ikip 20:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 20:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Great, make sure to put the article incubator category on them. Ikip 01:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 00:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much Ikip! <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 03:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Birthdates on CSI
PLEASE do not revert all these back. At best these are from websites that no longer exist...at worst, they are original research or have changed several times within the series. Anyway, we do not include birthdates in other shows - therefore, they shouldn't be here. By reverting them, you are encouraging those who like to make up info and try to turn Wikipedia into a fansite rather than an encyclopedic source. If you check the user who added all the birthdates, you will see they have a habit of questionable additions. So I ask you please not to put the birthdates back. Trista (cannot log in at work) 24.176.191.234 (talk) 22:52, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Trista, for your knowledge I've never reverted your edits, just asking you to use some proper templates instead of removing them. Contents removal are not encouraged on Wikipedia but if you believe that the birthdates are self-made and can be challenged, you are more than welcome to remove them. <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 23:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies, Arteyu. I saw the revert on Sara Sidle and thought you might be reverting all of the ones I had removed. The only birthdate that is solid is Gil Grissom's, as it was part of a storyline. The rest of them are guesses on the part of people editing through a partial show reference. I am just so tired of seeing these. Right now, there is a small contingent that keeps changing Lindsay Monroe to Messer, based on her answering her cell phone as "Lindsay Messer" when her own husband was calling. So far, she has never been introduced that way, and CBS still has her listed as Monroe on the CSI:NY website. Anyway, I have been trying hard to keep Wikipedia from becoming a fan/gossip site - but I'm almost ready to give up as there are more people who would rather print fiction than fact. *sigh* I'll leave off on that now. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Trista 24.176.191.234 (talk) 23:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I am a big fan, but unfortunately do not get a chance to watch the latest shows unless I can find time to watch on the 'net - as I do not get CBS at home. We have DirectTV, but no local channels as I do not want to give up my NY/LA feeds of NBC. I enjoy the NY/LA newscasts very much, and if I opt for local channels, I will only be able to watch the Reno NBC affiliate, which stinks (around here we say their news slogan is "When news breaks, we fix it!"). So I have not seen any of this season of any of the shows yet. I have only had time to see a couple of the NCIS episodes on the Internet. Thanks for understanding my frustration. I'm just getting so tired of the vandals & twits who think Wikipedia is their own personal playground and do not understand what it is meant for. I have repeatedly said I would gladly give up my IP editing priveleges if Wikipedia would make everyone register with a valid e-mail address. I truly believe this would get rid of at least 3/4s of the vandalism. Take care, Trista 24.176.191.234 (talk) 00:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
 * 1) Proposal to Close This RfC
 * 2) Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip  02:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Copy of your article
...the link is, User:Arteyu/World Junior Squash Championships.  Chzz  ►  07:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and it's great to have you back (: <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 07:13, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

BLP sticky PROD
Hi !. Every attempt to rescue a Wikipedia article is a noble gesture. However, there may be occasions when, with the best  will in the world, it  is just  not  possible to accord even a minimum of notability to an article or stub, or find a proper source for it. Most regrettably, even the most  dedicated inclusionists will have to concede that  the article may  have to  go if the creator or major contributors cannot  justify their work. For new and recent unsourced BLPs, some users are now working at  WT:BLP PROD TPL on  the development  of templates that are designed to  encourage contributors to source new BLPs, without  scaring away the newbies who  might  not  be aware of the rules. This template is certainly not  another  a licence to  kill for the deletionists, in  fact  the very idea of it  is to  ensure that  you  are not  fighting a losing  battle. It would be great if you  could look  in  at the prgogress and maybe leave a word of encouragement. The workshop page is essentially a template development taskforce, and is not a place to  engage in a hefty  debate on  incusion/deletion  policy. See you at WT:BLP PROD TPL?--Kudpung (talk) 12:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Nicol David
Hi,

As discussed, I am reviewing Nicol David with a view to granting good article status.

The review will be conducted in Talk:Nicol_David/GA1.

Further to our off-wiki chats, I look forward to working with you, and improving the article.  Chzz  ►  01:54, 14 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much pal (: <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 01:56, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Please monitor Talk:Nicol_David/GA1; if you fix things, please mark as   Chzz  ►  08:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow; thanks for fixing things up so quickly. Fantastic. I will add more ASAP, hopefully within a few hours of this message.  Chzz  ►  21:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

 Chzz  ►  18:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. I've added some more bits and pieces, and done a bit more copy-editing. Apologies for any delays; I've been trying hard to do it. If you can address those (through discussion of course), then I would just like to re-examine the lede, and have one good read-through. Speak soon,  Chzz  ►  09:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Re. table - see screeny. Will try and work more on the GA stuff today. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  08:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Nicol David - promoted to a Good Article
I'm pleased to inform you that, following the GA review process, I have now changed Nicol David to a Good Article. Congratulations.

I encourage you to continue working on it - often, article quality can deteriorate over time; it is also important to keep things up to date.

Special thanks for being so prompt in your responses to issues raised during the review. I can only apologize that I was not so quick myself.

It was great to work with you; best wishes.  Chzz  ►  13:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you Chzz (: <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 15:18, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you very much Mkativerata, I'm honestly very humbled to receive this award. Thank you very much again pal, I really, really appreciate it. (: <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 07:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Survey
A new user asked for help in getting some Wikipedians to complete this survey - anonymous, and only for research. If you have a few spare minutes, perhaps you could complete it. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  06:08, 10 April 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ Done it (: <font face="Segoe Script"> Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 06:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Turkmenistani to Turkmen
Hi, dear Arteyu! There are some recent changes by Cydebot, for example (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Turkmen_footballers&diff=prev&oldid=356582992). I don't know who instructed him/her to to that. Do you have idea when the rest will be moved to Turkmen? Someone who can delete can move that pages, categories etc. There are lots of Turkmenistani pages such as Category:Turkmenistani sportspeople stubs... Kind Regards  --Hanberke (talk) 08:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I see that you created Category:Turkmen sportspeople stubs as a redirect to Category:Turkmenistani sportspeople stubs. Stub categories, however, are automatically populated by templates, such as Turkmenistan-sport-bio-stub.  You need to make sure that any changes to a stub category are matched by corresponding changes to all relevant templates, otherwise you will end up with some pages in the new category and some in the old. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Malaysia
Hi, you are receiving this message because you are currently in WikiProject Malaysia's member list. The project is currently undergoing revamping and we would like to find out who the current active members are. If you still would like to remain in the project(we hope you do!), please add your name to the list here. Also, we are collecting ideas as to the direction of this project and we would love to hear your suggestions and feedback. Please visit this page to leave your comments. Thank you and happy editing! On behalf of the WikiProject Malaysia, <font color="#00FFFF">Bejinhan <font color="#0080FF">Talk  10:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Aston Villa.svg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aston Villa.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Malaysia Update
Here's a brief update on the latest... :-
 * I've transcluded the new members list to the prior existing members list. There's a redirect on the new members list page to the actual members list.
 * I've compiled the list of feedback given here and placed them on a plan page. Please do go and take a look at them. For the suggestions to be carried out, we need volunteers. At the bottom of the plan page, there is a  Volunteer  section. Please add your name and include which area you would like to volunteer in.

If you have any questions or comments please leave them here. On behalf of WikiProject Malaysia, <font color="#00FFFF">Bejinhan <font color="#0080FF">Talk  09:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dundee FC.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dundee FC.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Collaboration of the Month
Per the WikiProject Malaysia's Plan page, I've "jumpstart" the Collaboration of the Month's project page. Please head over there to vote/comment or submit new nominees. We need your help to make this a success! On behalf of WikiProject Malaysia, Bejinhan  Talk   03:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Malaysia
Hi Arteyu! I saw that you helped to promote the Nicol David article to GA status. I'm looking towards getting the Malaysia article to GA status. Can we work together on this? I'm not familiar with the processes. I tried to nominate it to FA status once, and it failed miserably. :p Looking forward to your reply. Bejinhan Talk   14:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Invitation
Cheong Kok Chun (talk) 02:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Malaysia
Hi Arteyu, that's ok. I understand. The suggestions sounds good. I think I'll request for a peer review and we'll see how things go. Thanks! Bejinhan Talk   15:00, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you very much for signing up for the July Backlog Elimination Drive! The copyedit backlog stretches back two and a half years, all the way back to the beginning of 2008! We're really going to need all the help we can muster to get it down to a manageable number. We've ambitiously set a goal of clearing all of 2008 from the backlog this month. In order to do that, we're going to need more participants. Is there anyone that you can invite or ask to participate with you? If so, we're offering an award to the person who brings in the most referrals. Just notify ɳorɑfʈ  Talk! or <font color="#006600" face="Felix Titling">Diannaa <font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">TALK of who your referrals are. Once again, thanks for your support! --<font color="#006600" face="Felix Titling">Diannaa <font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">TALK 14:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Backlog Elimination Drive Has Begun
Hello, I just wanted to take a moment and announce that the July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive has started, and will run for a month. Thanks for signing up. There's a special prize for most edits on the first day, in case you've got high ambitions. Enjoy! ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 04:14, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Reminder
Hi! This message is just a friendly reminder that you signed up to participate in the GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive. I noticed that you haven't logged a single copy edit yet. We'd love to see you participate! The drive runs three more weeks so there's still plenty of time to earn barnstars. Thanks! -- Diannaa (Talk) 22:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

The Malaysian WikiProject News
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno at 16:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 18:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Burnley FC.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Burnley FC.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Big Dom  11:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive invitation
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 23:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC).

Request for comment
The following Afds about tennis players needs input: Anna Wishink and Jade Hopper. Armbrust <sup style="color:#E3A857;">Talk  <sub style="color:#008000;">Contribs  00:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Rowland Goodman's images
I've begun a discussion on the admin's noticeboard on Commons regarding this editor's uploads to Commons. You may wish to participate. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Given the notability guidelines for tennis players there are now...
Hi there. Good to the see the new guidelines for tennis notability in place. It s likley not a pressing matter but I m wondering now how we should reconcile having wikilinks in place for players as listed on WP articles that are drawsheets for Challenger events (such as 2010 Challenger Banque Nationale de Granby – Singles) as well as pages presenting a year's ATP Challenger Tour calender (such as 2010 ATP Challenger Tour). Having wikilinks in place for players(' names) on these pages fully suggests that competitors in Challenger tourneys are WP notable, which is not true according to our new guidelines (as only titlests are). (I d still favour seeing Challenger quarterfinalists or better in singles and either finalists or semi-finalists or better in doubles be considered notable). Rather minor issues perhaps but ones that need to be tidied up ultimately, surely. Mayumashu (talk) 01:24, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the was a definite lack of interest shown. I ve never been involved in the wikiproject for tennis (or for anything for that matter - prefer to work on WP independently - real life requires enough towing lines and following others that ultimately doesnt lead to anything that significant other than getting the next pay cheque).  The main thing is for me is I don t see there being with the WP tennis bios, likewise because of the lack of interest, too many tennis player bios being deleted either, at least any time soon.  This is something that can be revisited in a year or two and reconsidered, it seems say to say.  And most players who compete regularly in challengers have competed in at least one ATP Tour event main draw - the prominent challenger level players bios are safe as the guidelines stand, arent they.  Good chatting and have a good one,  Mayumashu (talk) 15:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Viktorija Rajicic for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Viktorija Rajicic, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Viktorija Rajicic until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 18:43, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

IRC help channel
Er, hi Arteyu. Was it you whom I temporarily banned from #wikipedia-en-help yesterday? If so, I'm sorry about that. I somehow mistook you for someone else (a troll). Apologies. --KFP (contact | edits) 17:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, ok. Nevermind then! --KFP (contact | edits) 20:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Squash players
<font style="color:white;background:grey;font-family:sans-serif;"> Fallschirmjäger  &#9993; 17:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Caroline Garcia for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Caroline Garcia, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Caroline Garcia until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Armbrust <sup style="color:#E3A857;">Talk  <sub style="color:#008000;">Contribs  16:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)