User talk:Artfullheart

International Institute for Trauma and Addiction Professionals
As requested, I've now moved this article to the correct title, at International Institute for Trauma and Addiction Professionals. -- The Anome (talk) 10:19, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I've now also merged Certified Sex Addiction Therapist into that article. -- The Anome (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Anthony Ausgang
The article certainly is adequately referenced, clear and well written. There is possibly a small query as to whether notability is demonstrated, but I do see that he has exhibited in a number of notable places and with and for notable people and organisations, so it is certainly worth transferring into article-space.

May I pause to give a word of advice? When creating an article, particularly if it may be at risk of deletion, do not create it in a talk-page. I appreciate that you have put a bold message at the top of the page, but a talk-page without san article to link to can be seen as an automatic speedy deletion candidate. It is much better to create in your sandbox or in a WP:SUBPAGE until it is ready to appear as an article. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation is another place it could have been craeted. However, this admin agrees that the new article is sufficiently improved that it is not subject to speedy deletion under G4, so it's now in the main article space. —C.Fred (talk) 19:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Institute for Trauma and Addiction Professionals concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Institute for Trauma and Addiction Professionals, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:22, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Culp


A tag has been placed on Joseph Culp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.walkingtheatregroup.com/joseph-culp/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   09:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The OUTWORDS Archive (March 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The OUTWORDS Archive and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The OUTWORDS Archive, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_OUTWORDS_Archive Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JSFarman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_OUTWORDS_Archive reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 04:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The OUTWORDS Archive has been accepted
 The OUTWORDS Archive, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! JSFarman (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=The_OUTWORDS_Archive help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of John Cogswell (psychologist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Cogswell (psychologist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Cogswell (psychologist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)