User talk:Arthur7171

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Camaron | Chris (talk) 13:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image tagging for Image:Bcgeasyshare.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bcgeasyshare.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:QegsCrestJpg-1-.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:QegsCrestJpg-1-.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:HotelExterior2 LonMet F-1-.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:HotelExterior2 LonMet F-1-.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Arthur7171
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Arthur7171. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 10:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirects
Do not redirect articles until a full consensus has been reached on the article's talk page. Dalejenkins | 10:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Once a merge has been requested you have to wait at least a week to allow consensus to form before merging (and then only if the consensus is to merge). John Hayestalk 10:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sweetsassy.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Sweetsassy.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:UK road A158 Burgh Bypass.PNG
Thank you for uploading Image:UK road A158 Burgh Bypass.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:33, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Vent.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Vent.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Centerparcs, Whinfell Forest
Hi Arthur7171. Thanks for adding the information about Centerparcs to the Whinfell Forest page. Whinfell Forest exists independently of Centerparcs. Centerparcs is a tenant of the Lowther Estates who own the forest. I've re-inserted some material that had been deleted when the information about Centerparcs was added, and done some slight restructuring to reinstate the difference between the forest and the holiday village. (Northernhenge (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC))

What is Made at Whinfell Forest, please publish on the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgeduckers (talk • contribs) 17:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Vent2.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vent2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MickMacNee (talk) 01:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Football nationalities
Hi. I've reverted your recent changes to Chelsea F.C. and Manchester United F.C.. The UK is not a nation in international football. England, Scotland etc. are. The four country flags should remian in articles so that all playetrs ionternational eligibility is clear.--Peter cohen (talk) 19:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Advice on Center Parcs articles
I mean no offence, but in my view as an experienced editor here in Wikipedia, I don't think Center Parcs Longleat Forest is worth keeping beyond the first section plus two sentences about accommodation. As it stands, it is in danger of being deleted altogether, see WP:ADVERT.

My best advice is that you don't create the full set of separate articles suggested by the navigation box, but a combined article, perhaps List of Center Parcs. The ones that have some history such as Whinfell Forest can remain as separate articles, but any like Longleat should become just a redirect to the list.

Maybe you might create a more complex table to summarise the numerical stuff. However, a list article doesn't have to be a bare list; you should keep any genuinely interesting local titbits about each site, probably as separate sections following the table.

This may come as rather depressing advice as I see you have put a lot of work into the editing you have done, but I hope you can accept it from an experienced hand. I've had stuff deleted that I had worked hard on too, but in the end I realised that it made for a better encyclopedia. Regards, Fayenatic (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Your edits to England players
Hi. Please would you not update players' appearances before the match has even started. According to your edits, Steven Gerrard (for example) had 68 caps for England before yesterday's match. Apart from being wrong, it's really misleading to those who come along later. If they see the last update was timed before the match, they assume the stats haven't yet been updated, so add on another appearance or goal without bothering to check what the facts actually are. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Center Parcs Longleat Forest
A tag has been placed on Center Parcs Longleat Forest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Center Parcs Longleat Forest and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 17:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 20:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Euro 2008 new.png
A tag has been placed on Image:Euro 2008 new.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Olympic medals
the medal count is done by total medals, not just by gold.CMJMEM (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

File:BustransBlueLettering.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:BustransBlueLettering.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:47, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Mcfcaway.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mcfcaway.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:10, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:A158 Burgh Bypass.jpg
File:A158 Burgh Bypass.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:A158 Burgh Bypass.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Pablo Zabaleta.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Pablo Zabaleta.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Pablo Zabaleta.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Pablo Zabaleta.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. 67.85.125.17 (talk) 04:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Removing relegation colours from the 2010 FIFA World Cup groups
I notice you've removed the red relegation colours without adding comments. Any particular reason? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The elimination colour is no longer needed because all group games have been played and all the group winners and runners up have been confirmed, so its clear which 16 teams are no longer in the tournament. The elimination colours are only needed while the group is still active.
 * That's not quite the case. European leagues continue to display the relegation colours after the end of the season. You may find a revolt when the Brits wake up. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * They're kept for the European leagues because otherwise it would be unclear who was relegated, in tournament football as soon as the group stage is completed it becomes clear immediatley.

Javier Garrido
Please remember to cite sources when refering to transfer information. I've updated this one. Thanks. gonads 3  11:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb ground Tórsvøllur
Template:Fb ground Tórsvøllur has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 23:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sweet & Sassy


The article Sweet & Sassy has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, extremely short-lived television program.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Tesco stores portfolio
Hi,

Re your update of the table of stores. The table does not appear to be included in the citation given. Can you supply correct citation? Jgedwards (talk) 10:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Russian Premier League
Number of wins comes before head-to-head games to decide who's above who in the standings. Therefore Amkar is above Tom and Kuban is above Rubin and their head-to-head games are irrelevant. Geregen2 (talk) 19:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Wimbledon
Where is it written that "live edits are not necessary"? Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 14:41, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The tennis pages show the set result and thus 3-2, 4-3 for example is irrelevant and not necessary.

Football table updates
Could you at least some of the time leave an edit summary so I know what it is you've done? Thanks. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * And when you update the tables, can you check them before you save, because otherwise I have to go through them and correct your mistakes. It's great to do them fast, but not if you make mistakes all the time. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You need to make edit summaries, and it's really inconvenient when I get an edit conflict because you've made mistakes. I then have to check through and correct your mistakes. It will be easier for me to just revert you and do it properly if this continues. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:32, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hey, just want to echo the point made by Bretonbanquet in September. Please add info to the edit summaries below the edit so that I can easily tell which leagues you've updated. See here for info: WP:Edit summary. Cheers  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  22:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Please add info to the edit summaries below the edit so that I can easily tell which leagues you've updated. It does not take long and it helps a lot. Please do not just ignore your talk page. Cheers.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  20:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In 2011–12 Boston United F.C. season, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Gainsborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

League tables
Don't edit a table until all the results are finished. Common sense. Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * How many mistakes in this? Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Boston United F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

I Reverted Your Revision
Why did you revert the edit adding the IM swimming totals to the Olympic medal table. There was absolutely no reason to do that. Smartyllama (talk) 19:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited 2012–13 Scunthorpe United F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Ryan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:26, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Table edits
DO NOT update tables before all the games are finished. It's not a bloody race. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The Mansfield game was still going, because I was listening to it myself. It always gets updated, usually soon AFTER the games are over. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary
Is it too much to ask that you use the edit summary? You've been asked before but you're still not doing it. It's a lot of help to other editors and as a user who has been on Wikipedia for a while you really should know better.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  16:35, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Sources please
Please provide sources for the tables of results you are adding to articles, e.g. Lancashire, so other editors can check the accuracy. I'm sure you didn't just make these numbers up, so please tell us where they came from. Please also provide edit summaries as you have been asked many times before. --  Dr Greg   talk  20:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 FA Trophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gainsborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Grimsby Town
Please don't remove the Won, Draw and Loss indications from the results section on 2012–13 Grimsby Town F.C. season, these as well as the colour indicate the result. Please don't remove this again. Kind Regards, Footballgy (talk) 02:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Edit summary
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  21:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 Fußball-Bundesliga table
Template:2012–13 Fußball-Bundesliga table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 16:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 2. Fußball-Bundesliga table
Template:2012–13 2. Fußball-Bundesliga table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 19:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 Austrian Football Bundesliga table
Template:2012–13 Austrian Football Bundesliga table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 01:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 Swiss Super League table
Template:2012–13 Swiss Super League table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 01:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group A standings
Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group A standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 01:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2011 League of Ireland Premier Division table
Template:2011 League of Ireland Premier Division table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 17:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey Arthur7171

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Template:2013–14 Premier League table
Hi. I saw yoiu have been editing Template:2013–14 Premier League table. Please make sure you read the documentation for the template before making updates to make sure that everything is updated correctly. Noiw it seems as if you have forgotten to update the team positions at Template:2013–14 Premier League table/p (the helper template) to make sure that the parts of the tables are correct on the respective team season article. Please be aware of this in the future. QED 237  (talk)  01:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The same applies for your recent edit at Template:2013–14 Football League One table. You MUST update the helper template. QED 237   (talk)  22:02, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * COME ON. Now also the Template:2013–14 Football League Two table. UPDATE THE HELPER or I will revert and warn for disruptive editing. QED 237   (talk)  22:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * What was there to update on League Two? - there were no position changes after Monday..


 * Okay my bad, no position change that time. But today in league two you left Burton ahead of Oxford and Southend even if they have the same points and worse goaldiff. Why? QED 237   (talk)  23:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * my goodness

April 2014
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 23:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Upgrading league table templates
Hi,

Thanks for updating the league table templates this season.

There is a reason why I had not created the table templates for upcoming seasons and I thought I should mention why, since you have been a bit involved in updating the templates this season.

First of all there is consensus at WT:FOOTY to remove the years name it only "Premier League table" or "Current Premier League table" so we can use same template season after season without creating new one s every season. Just substitute the template on the pages it is used and then reset it with new teams. This can be read at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 84 and this TfD. Already renamed template are for example Template:Current Fußball-Bundesliga table‎.

Secondly this templates use helper templates such as template:PL13 which is used and this template is maybe to be removed. The templates has had a lot of problems with editors not updating the helper template so that is why a new solution is considered. There has been a new solution presented to me at User talk:Qed237 (by an other editor working hard with these templates) where helper template must not be updated. This can currently be seen at 2014–15 Eredivisie table and Template:2014–15 Eredivisie table/layout. I am/was strongly considering implementing that when a few minor "issues" is solved.

Thirdly the template:fb cl team is supposed to be replaced by template:fb cl2 team by WT:FOOTY consensus and a TfD. This since a lot of uneccessary fb team templates should be removed. I have wikilinks to consensus somewhere if you need them.

Just letting you know so that you dont get surprised if the templates gets a major overhauling this summer and look different next season. If you have any questions or thoughts that is very appreciated. Just let me know on my talkpage if you have any comments or questions. Thank you. QED 237  (talk)  21:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 16 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Template:2013–14 Northern Premier League Premier Division table page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=608814271 your edit] caused a missing references list (help | help with group references) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F608814271%7CTemplate:2013–14 Northern Premier League Premier Division table%5D%5D Ask for help])

Proposed deletion of Center Parcs Sherwood Forest


The article Center Parcs Sherwood Forest has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability; minimal Google results

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BDD (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Les Bois-Francs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Les Bois-Francs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Les Bois-Francs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:34, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Center Parcs
Template:Center Parcs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)