User talk:ArthurWillock

September 2022
Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Aura (paranormal)—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:05, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aura (paranormal). Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Blaze Wolf, I use the Aura Goggle model myself, and they are a device used for auric research. I find they do show a highlighted corona and I wanted to share this with people. I see how it may look from the side, though my contribution is in no way related to promotion or the seller of these. Also, their website has a decent resource about research related to auric phenomena, with a collection of very interesting footage and clips. Of course, they are not necessarily proof of recorded aura, but interesting and though provoking nonetheless. ArthurWillock (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter. Wikipedia isn't for advertising whatever the hell it is. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not advertising . ArthurWillock (talk) 16:35, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:ArthurWillock. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:36, 16 September 2022 (UTC)