User talk:Arthurchanning

AfD nomination of Legislative district of Dasmariñas City
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Legislative district of Dasmariñas City. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Legislative district of Dasmariñas City (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

SJDM and Antipolo districts
Please refrain from making any more moves that the articles for Antipolo and Rizal be merged or deleted. Congress is for national legislation and is not part of provincial governments - it does not matter whether a component city has its own districts, what matters is that they are uniquely configured because of special circumstances. What makes SJDM and Antipolo unique is that they are not identical to any of the districts that are given a numerical designation under the name "Bulacan" or "Rizal." They are not called the '5th district of Bulacan' or the '3rd and 4th districts of Rizal.' Dasmariñas, on the other hand, is completely identical to the 4th district of Cavite, that's why I initially pushed for the article to be deleted or merged with the Cavite article in order to avoid redundancy, not because I was denying the legitimacy or deservedness of the district. In fact I'm proud to call myself a Dasmarineño and I've never hesitated to express my opinions regarding a more equitable district representation for the whole country, which includes the creation of a second district in the city. I have now performed a compromise in which the 4th district section of the Cavite article is linked to the Dasmariñas City article, which no longer necessitates that the lone district article, (which you have defended, mainly because it was your creation) be deleted. I do hope that you do not resort to vindictive tactics backed by non-substantive claims and rationale in the future, as such shows little regard for reason and civil discussion, something which has no place in Wikipedia. Let's contribute and approach things more constructively! Thanks. --- isagani (talk) 01:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 06:30, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

TFOWR 11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Template:Philippine legislative districts. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TFOWR 17:50, 13 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Also at 15th Congress of the Philippines. I've warned both of you about 3RR. Stop reverting each other, discuss issues at the relevant talk pages, and wait until you have a agreement. If you're unable to agree, consider getting a third opinion or raising the issue at any relevant WIkiProjects. TFOWR 17:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

SM City SJDM
SM SJDM is not a rumor SM Mall, kindly check www.ulc.com.ph, and you wil see that SM Prime Holdings will built SM Mall located at the Intermodal Terminal of MRT7 in San Jose del Monte —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.57.200 (talk) 06:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

SM Supermalls
I suggest you place the references for these proposed malls directly on the table, if there are any at all. Otherwise they are not unsourced and thus, there is no proof that they will be constructed. Rxlxm (talk) 03:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)