User talk:Artimaean

Welcome!

Hello, Artimaean, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 13:30, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

articles on books
To show the notability of a book, the article on it must say more than that it has been publiwshed, and give the link to a notable author. The criteria are at WP:BOOK. You need to describer the books, both the plot briefly and also the publishing history, and give references to references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases-- Published reviews in newspapers and magazines are the usual sources for published books. You should also give references to any published criticism--there will be some for well known books, and any librarian can help you find it.

when you can't find this sort of material, or don't have the time for it, the best course is usually to start ouyt making a redirect to the article on the authro.  DGG ( talk ) 21:11, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Why Bother? (essay)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Why Bother? (essay) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Viriditas (talk) 01:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Why Bother? (essay)
The article Why Bother? (essay) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Why Bother? (essay) for things which need to be addressed. Viriditas (talk) 12:25, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Why Bother? (essay)
The article Why Bother? (essay) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Why Bother? (essay) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Viriditas (talk) 02:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

HI!
As far as Edna O'Brien goes, I am not going to change the article from its current form, but as you appear to be quite familiar with her work I won't contest any reasonable edits you make. I'll remove her from my already overlong watchlist. Cheers! Quis separabit? 22:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Whatever, dude, go for it! Quis separabit?  00:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Cite book
Regarding your use of the template Cite book in several articles--for example, in this contribution to Jean Racine: The field "authorlink=" is used when the author of the cited work has a Wikipedia article. In this case, you are citing the Introduction, whose author, Michael Howcroft, has no Wikipedia article, so the field is not needed. To show that you are citing the Introduction, use the field "chapter=" instead. If you have any questions or concerns, you can reply right here. Cheers!-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  20:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Sartor Resartus
It doesn't look like mud to me! But that's one of the problems when people use different screen-shapes, brightness, user-preferences etc. On one computer screen 300px will look right, on another it will look huge. I uploaded that image myself back in 2009. I still have the Sullivan edition of Sartor, so I could upload a higher quality version, though I don't know whether that would make a difference. Paul B (talk) 20:41, 24 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Of course the original serial and book-versions were not illustrated, so there is no specific "look" to Sartor as there is for Tristram Shandy, with its blank pages etc, but I could upload more of the many illustrations to the Sullivan version if you wish to have more images. Paul B (talk) 20:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=559179376 your edit] to Dæmonomania may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * In an Introductory chapter taking place mid-way through the novel's plot, Pierce Moffett takes a bus ride from the Blackberry

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Rorty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oblivion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Cory Doctorow#Cory Doctorow and Creative Commons
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cory Doctorow. Thanks. Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 01:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 8 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Eduard Mörike page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=637109033 your edit] caused a duplicate page number error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F637109033%7CEduard Mörike%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Love and Sleep Cover.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Love and Sleep Cover.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

"Sir Thomas More (play" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sir_Thomas_More_(play&redirect=no Sir Thomas More (play] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)