User talk:Artiquities

Cropping
Please note that when you crop an existing image already in Wikipedia, you must show the link back to the original image, otherwise you are technically infringing the copyright, as you have not fulfilled the attribution. I've done File:Rob crop.jpg and File:Tillmans crop.jpg for you - I think there's some more that you need to do. (NB to link to an image put : after the first set of square brackets - e.g. File:Tillmans crop.jpg - then you get the link and not the picture). Otherwise they are liable to get deleted.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 19:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ronhjones - thanks for info - yes I will check over those that I have done. Artiquities (talk) 19:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Damon crop 2010.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Damon crop 2010.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

You're invited to join WikiProject Women artists!
SarahStierch (talk) 10:05, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, sure, I have joined - and thanks for suggesting. Artiquities (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Goldsmiths College alumni for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Goldsmiths College alumni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Goldsmiths College alumni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Aide mémoire (dictionary definition) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aide mémoire (dictionary definition). Since you had some involvement with the Aide mémoire (dictionary definition) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 14:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fassbinder crop.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fassbinder crop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Brilliant.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brilliant.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Chris wool the harder.jpg


The file File:Chris wool the harder.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-free image of a work of art being used for decorative purposes in an article about the person who created it. Typically, non-free use would be acceptable as the primary means of identification in a stand-alone article about the work of art itself, but a much stronger non-free justification is required for other articles and other uses. This particular piece is not itself the subjuect of any sourced commentary within the article, so the context required by WP:NFCC is lacking.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:33, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Wade guyton untitled 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wade guyton untitled 2008.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Surrealism
Template:Surrealism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Lucas eating a ban.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lucas eating a ban.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Timothy Joseph Wood 16:58, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Veilhan crop.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Veilhan crop.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Baldessari corrected.jpg


The file File:Baldessari corrected.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned, bad color rebalancing of File:John Baldessari (2009).jpg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 01:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Jeff Wall (cropped).jpg


The file File:Jeff Wall (cropped).jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned photo of Jeff Wall (cropped from a photo at Commons)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 19:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:School of London
Template:School of London has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  12:23, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Landy crop.jpg


The file File:Landy crop.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

fair use photo of Helen Chadwick
Hi Artiquities, I took the liberty of swapping out the image you uploaded in 2011 for the artist with a different one, different pose, with better resolution and showing her with her work. You will probably be receiving a notice about the orphan fair use image and I wanted to let you know what happened Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Helen chadwick.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Helen chadwick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miel de Botton


The article Miel de Botton has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of notability, weak references"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Klein crop.jpg


The file File:Klein crop.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, superseded by File:William Klein à la Cinémathèque française (cropped).jpg."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 09:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)