User talk:Artistbook1

Artistbook1, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

April 2014
Hello, I'm Elizium23. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Noah (2014 film), because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dan Haseltine seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''It is an opinion that the Bible supports homosexual marriage. There are many Evangelical congregations that also support homosexual marriage on Biblical grounds. Also, the information should be supported with a reference.'' Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at God's Not Dead (film), you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia does not user website user ratings in film articles, nor do we offset low critical ratings with WP:NPOV descriptions of box office results. If independent reliable sources do not tell the story you wish to report, it cannot be added to the article. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 03:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at God's Not Dead (film). ''Wikipedia does not user website user ratings in film articles, nor do we offset low critical ratings with WP:NPOV descriptions of box office results. If independent reliable sources do not tell the story you wish to report, it cannot be added to the article.'' Sum mer PhD  (talk) 03:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before attempting to emphasize your point of view in the article again. If you continue to edit the way you have been without discussing disputed issues, you will be blocked from editing. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 03:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before attempting to emphasize your point of view in the article again. If you continue to edit the way you have been without discussing disputed issues, you will be blocked from editing. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 03:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person   on Jars of Clay, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. For such a controversial claim, you will need an explicitly reliable source stating exactly what you are adding.  Sum mer PhD  (talk) 03:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at God's Not Dead (film). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Jars of Clay. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:03, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

And for the record, making three consecutive edits on an article is not making three reverts. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm Frosty. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to English Wikipedia seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Frosty ☃ 01:13, 22 August 2014 (UTC)