User talk:Artmug

Welcome!
Hi Artmug! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Pbritti (talk) 03:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I just want to offer clarity to the false statement that the decision REVERSED the 2021 ruling... It did not reverse. If you read the document, you'll see that it instead reaffirms and even incorporates that decision. See Par 5 of Fiducia of Fiducia. The 2021 ruling forbade blessing UNIONS. The document also forbids blessing UNIONS but allows blessing COUPLES. There is a distinction between the two which the document clearly mentions. So using the word REVERSE is highly misleading. If you read the statements of Bishops, clarifications of the Holy See etc. The media is what is twisting the words and claiming it was reversed. Artmug (talk) 04:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia defers to reliable sources, meaning that even though you may believe there is an obvious interpretation, if there is a plurality of reliable sources saying otherwise, we state that thing. If other reliable sources disagree, we also present that opinion. See our due weight standard. If you have any questions, feel welcome to ask! ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Fiducia supplicans, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''Hi! Your edits on Fiducia supplicans are contrary to a preexisting consensus to stick to exactly what sources are saying, rather than interpreting the document itself (what Wikipedia describes as original research). You are encouraged to undo your additions. ~'' Pbritti (talk) 03:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: leads don't require references for material cited in the body of the text. Please also check to see if a source is already referenced. I altered one of the citations you added to link to the same reference—this is preferable to repeating the same source in full throughout the text. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)