User talk:Artrainschool

AfC notification: Draft:Lisa Alvarado has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lisa Alvarado. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Draft:Lisa Alvarado does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Lisa Alvarado has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lisa Alvarado. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Alvarado has been accepted
 Lisa Alvarado, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Lacypaperclip (talk) 02:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Lisa_Alvarado help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natural Information Society has been accepted
 Natural Information Society, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Chetsford (talk) 08:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Natural_Information_Society help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Natural Information Society for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natural Information Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Natural Information Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lacypaperclip (talk) 03:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Natural Information Society‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''Attempting to edit war through an (in use) tag is never a good idea. Please stop it! If you do not you may possibly get blocked. Disrespecting an (in use) tag is not good, but edit warring while an (in use) tag is in place is disruptive editing which will get you blocked.'' Lacypaperclip (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * See Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring where your name has been mentioned. You may respond there if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)