User talk:Arturo13

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Some other editors and I have noticed that you've been adding "Nicktoons" to the infobox of a number of shows, including at Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness in [this edit]. These contributions keep getting reverted, because the Infobox parameter "network" is for the original network that the show aired on, not for networks/channels that rerun the series. For more info, check out Template:Infobox television. If you have any questions feel free to ask. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robot & Monster, you may be blocked from editing. Admins: User continues to add "Nicktoons" to infobox Network parameter, which is designated to list the original networks, not re-run networks, etc. User has been apprised of this before. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nicktoons Original Series, you may be blocked from editing. ''Admins: User continues to add Monsuno as a original nicktoon series, even thought it is not produced in Nicktoons Original Studios and has not been mentioned as one. User has been apprised of this before.'' GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 16:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of Robot and Monster episodes ‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Diff:  Read this: WP:NOTHERE Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Grojband, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 23:39, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zach Callison


The article Zach Callison has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dog six (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zach Callison


The article Zach Callison has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable indivudual lacking non-trivial support.  WP:TOOSOON applies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dog six (talk) 00:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Zach Callison for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zach Callison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zach Callison until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dog six (talk) 07:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wyatt Griswold


The article Wyatt Griswold has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:53, 27 August 2018 (UTC)