User talk:Arturower

January 2022
Hello, I'm Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from a Wikipedia article. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 18:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 04:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Oz Almog
Hello there! Do you happen to have a personal connection with the artist whose page you are editing? Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 04:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Oz Almog
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Your warnings here are inappropriate. I have tried to verify the text you added when compared to the cited source, and it does not seem to support your text. I suggest you to engage at Talk:Oz Almog instead of edit warring. MarioGom (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)