User talk:Artvoice Reporter

July 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 00:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Artvoice Reporter, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Frank Dux has been reverted. Your edit here to Frank Dux was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VkNw9rYrUE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Frank Dux, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Niteshift36. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

IMDB
You are quite correct. IMDB does operate on the same lines as Wikipedia. That's exactly why it is not a reliable source, and neither is Wikipedia. So Wikipedia cannot be used as a source for itself. Read the guidelines, and definition, for reliable sources here. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 12:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC)