User talk:Arun Krishnan 1997

February 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Queen (film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   08:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm Nairspecht. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Neerja because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. ''Please ad a source to every edit that you make. Also, Wkipedia does not entertain promotionalism.'' Nairspecht (talk) 10:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

WP:FILMRATING
Hi there, while you obviously meant week in these edits, per WP:FILMRATING, we do not indiscriminately add film ratings to articles without context, as most film ratings are not universally understood. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mastizaade, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MBlaze Lightning  -  talk!   05:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mastizaade, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -  Managerarc   ™ talk  08:33, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Neerja. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diffs: Wikipedia is not a blog. Your personal opinions do not belong in articles. Also, we don't present opinions as incontrovertible fact.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at The Dirty Picture shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 08:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hamari Adhuri Kahani, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Clubjustin Talkosphere  04:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 04:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)