User talk:Arunvroy

Speedy deletion of Pazhaya Semimary
A tag has been placed on Pazhaya Semimary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 15:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Seminary.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Seminary.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 15:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Add yourself in Main project also
You might be interested in joining the main prjt of Christianity also - WikiProject Christianity/Members - Tinucherian (talk) 15:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Catholicatepalace.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Catholicatepalace.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 16:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Pazhaya Semimary
A tag has been placed on Pazhaya Semimary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mjroots (talk) 16:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Catholicatepalace.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Catholicatepalace.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 16:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pazhaya Semimary
A tag has been placed on Pazhaya Semimary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gromlakh (talk) 14:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Catholicos Moran Mar Beselios Paulose of the East
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Catholicos Moran Mar Beselios Paulose of the East, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Catholicos Moran Mar Beselios Paulose of the East is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Catholicos Moran Mar Beselios Paulose of the East, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Catholicos of The East
You have an interesting article. I have learned a lot. However, both sides have to be presented equally in this article about legitimacy. No side can be perceived to have "won" unless the other side concedes which they won't. Therefore, documents cannot be presented in raw format and conclusions drawn. Rather, arguments have to be drawn from scholars or people of authority on either side. Otherwise we violate WP:OR by appearing to put forward a new argument or say that the opponents argument fails on inspection. Having said that, the raw material may be presented without comment. However, the conclusion may not be apparent to the casual reader! Student7 (talk) 12:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Arun,
 * I know you are a big supporter of Indian orthodox Church. Having said that, Please dont vandalize viewpoints of other churches and denominations. The recent edits/redirects regarding articles of Catholicos is not very appreciable. This is an encylopedia . Hope you take this suggestion in good spirits - Tinucherian (talk) 14:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Please stop moving (renaming) this article without discussion. Student7 (talk) 12:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Links
Where you looking for these links from my page ?


 * New Page Creations Special:Newpages
 * Recent Changes Special:Recentchanges
 * Articles for deletion WP:AFD
 * Articles for deletion/Log/Today WP:AFD/T
 * Wikipedia:Copyright problems WP:CP
 * Wikipedia:Requested moves WP:RM
 * Category:Wikipedia maintenance CAT:M

Neutral point of view
Dear Arun

Please try to keep a Neutral point of view when creating or moving articles. Dont create articles with the same title to create a new page. I appreciate your zeal to the Indian Orthodox Church, but this is wikipedia and we have to keep a Neutral point of view. You can be of great help in creating good articles on Indian Orthodox Church. Please help wiki.

Brother in Christ Lijujacobk (talk) 14:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I am not here for an arguement on factional disputes. I am here to protect the NPOV of Wiki. Also remember that you are not the only one who can edit wiki. reverting is very easy if you haven't noticed. I dont care about such disputes but neutrality have to be kept and it would be kept at any cost.

You are stating your own point of views which is right in your own point of view but that doesn't mean it is accurate.

Read this page if you have spare time http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV This too http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines

Thanks again Lijujacobk (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Catholicos4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Catholicos4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Mar Basil Dayara,Pathanamthitta
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mar Basil Dayara,Pathanamthitta, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.indianchristianity.org/orthodox/ashram.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bethany Ashram,Perunad
A tag has been placed on Bethany Ashram,Perunad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Madviolinist (talk) 05:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Multiple copyright violations
You have created multiple articles that are straight lifts from other sites - this will be deleted. Don't create any more. --87.113.5.5 (talk) 16:03, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Christianity
Hello !

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 06:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Catholicos of The East and Malankara Metropolitan
Finally got our third opinion. You are invited to comment on the discussion page. Student7 (talk) 23:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

St. George Orthodox Church,Chandanapally
This article created by me, might interest you. Can you get me ( or upload) a possibly free image for the article. I have suggested this article for DYK also. - Tinucherian (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gabrielmargregorios.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gabrielmargregorios.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Malankara association
A tag has been placed on Malankara association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall <font color="#D4A017">talk  22:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The adminstrator who evaluated this article apparently agreed that the Association is not notable in its own right, but instead of deleting it changed it to a redirect. After your reversion to the original content, I have restored the redirect.  If you disagree with the admin's action, you are free to take it up with them on their talk page, but please do not revert the article again without further discussion.  Thank you. -- Finngall  <font color="#D4A017">talk  15:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Moran Mar Baselios Mar Thoma Didymos I
This article is up for move. And no, we don't move articles without discussing them first. The reason for the move is that the prefix "H.H." for His Holiness is on the article. Honorifics are not allowed in Wikipedia. It is an encyclopedia not a guide for the faithful.

And please stop moving stuff without discussion. Student7 (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I think I understand now. And since no one has tried to move them back, it must have been the thing to do. Student7 (talk) 11:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:StG.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:StG.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Malankara association
Thank you for the explanation. As I mentioned in Talk:Indian (Malankara) Orthodox Church and Talk:Jacobite Syrian Christian Church, the distinction is confusing for those unfamiliar with the subject. Regards, ... disco spinster  talk  14:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I have placed the text of the original page here: User:Arunvroy/Malankara association. At the moment it's is not ready to be in the main article space because it does not show how the association is notable (please see WP:ORG for the guidelines).  It had been tagged for speedy deletion when I first came across it, and it probably would have been deleted by another administrator because of the notability issue.  If you would like to work on it, it could eventually be moved back into the article space.  ...  disco spinster   talk  16:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The concept of "notability" in Wikipedia refers to "being the subject of coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Basically, it means "have you been written about or referred to?"  It's explained in more detail at the page Notability (organizations and companies).


 * Another aspect that is important is that the article be understandable by those who are not already familiar with the subject. You need to make clear what exactly the Malankara Association is and what church it is associated with.  As the article stands, it's difficult to make that out.  For example, is it the same association as the one in http://www.malankaraassociation.com?  That's why I originally redirected the page to Jacobite Syrian Christian Church.


 * I hope this clears up my concerns. ...  disco spinster   talk  17:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Catholicos1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Catholicos1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 09:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Bavacatholicos.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bavacatholicos.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Vssun (talk) 08:47, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Catholicate seal.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Catholicate seal.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Vattasseril.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vattasseril.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:04, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> In this issue...

- Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Bavakabar.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:56, 23 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Bavapalli.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Catholicate emblem.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Chembaduppu.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Seminary.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seminary.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:41, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Template:User Indian Orthodox
You can add this template on your userpage.--Path slopu (talk) 15:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Kaabar.jpg


The file File:Kaabar.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)