User talk:Arxquefyga

Child Photo Advisory
Your recent upload of File:File:Lance Lucido.jpg is noted. Whilst Wikipedia accepts a vast range of media, you are urged to consider if you really do want this image to be present on a public site, where it could be used for many purposes over which you, the subjects of the photo, their parents or guardians may have little control.

It is also strongly suggested that your confirm your relationship with the photo subjects, parents or guardians in an appropriate manner with a suitable administrator.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Sourcing will be be needed for article retention
Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. For the article to remain, it will need some work. It must show that the subject meets the relevant notability guideline. Please see the guide Notability. The content of the article must be supported with verifiable information from reliable sources. You can use the links below to find sources.

Dloh cierekim  20:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Okay, Mr. Dlohcierekim. I will try to add more sources/references to the article. Thanks Arxquefyga (talk) 00:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Done adding! Arxquefyga (talk) 01:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Nathaniel Britt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathaniel Britt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Britt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. OSborn arfcontribs. 04:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lance Lucido.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lance Lucido.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Redsky89 (talk) 06:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Nathaniel Britt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathaniel Britt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Britt & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ogie Escanilla for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ogie Escanilla, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Ogie Escanilla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)