User talk:AryaPratapSingh grandsonDrRajendraPrakashSingh

Welcome!
Hello, AryaPratapSingh grandsonDrRajendraPrakashSingh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. The page you are editing and deleting the changes over and again isn't appropriate, as I am putting up the use information of Rajendra Prakash Singh. Being his grandson I know what information is correct and genuine. I request you not to make any further changes on that page, as I have made all the necessary and important changes. Thank you! AryaPratapSingh grandsonDrRajendraPrakashSingh (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Please, read about WP:COI. You can't edit about your family, organisation etc. Here as you said you are breaking the rules of WP:COI even as you added the unreferenced sources, they are clearly breaking the rules of WP:ADVERTISEMENT. Please, stop doing this.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Okay, but the his son is the successor, and is a famous political activist too in the region, Mr. Avdhesh Pratap Singh.

Moreover, according to the definition of advertising, it something you are sharing as to promote something, and not giving a valid information. But here the content is genuine, and is under the owner of the page. Advertising is something restricting the contents validity and in order to expand. I request you not to change anything as it is hurting the sentiments of the family. Thank you. AryaPratapSingh grandsonDrRajendraPrakashSingh (talk) 09:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * You are adding unreferenced sources and that are not in encyclopedic style. You should bear in minid that it is an encyclopedic, not someone's website. I think it is enough for you.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes, but if you need the Adhar card validation by the Indian Government, I am ready to give you as a family member. Moreover, i have read the guidelines of the Wikipedia's page, the information here is genuine and Wikipedia does allow content from the local sources if they are genuine. Thank you! AryaPratapSingh grandsonDrRajendraPrakashSingh (talk) 10:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

You can not add Adhar Card or Pan Card for verification. You should add info from prominent media. Local sources mean local news sources not Adhar Card, Pan Card etc.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 10:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Well according to the a study, the increment in fake news by the media is 20-50% by the year 2019. Since adhar card is a thing of national verification done by the government, the media itself is a private organization which can edit or view its content on it's own. Sharing the sources of the media, which is private, rather than something that is verified by the government, I don't think so this is the answer to my question. How doesn't it violates the laws of wikipedia by sharing content from some private organization (that us media). AryaPratapSingh grandsonDrRajendraPrakashSingh (talk) 10:18, 7 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Vanity media usually do this. Prominent media don't spread fake news. And, I want to say again Wikipedia don't use Adhar Card for verification. Wikipedia is an independent encyclopedia. And, I have to say again that why don't you remove unreferenced info? Does his Adhar Card provide info about his political successor? I have to say about Adhar Card. There are a lot of controversies of Adhar Card. I hope you understand my words. Thanks.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 10:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)


 * As you don't remove those, I have to remove now.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 10:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Well any sort of media, except the ones by the government, are run by private people, and private people have full independence to publish whatever articles they want to, irrespective of any verification. And as far as the successor is concerned, newspapers including Dainik Bhaskar, Swadesh and Nai Dunia have published about his successor, but since we don't keep the records as we never need it. Further, many articles have been published about him yesterday, and many are being published, soon will share the reference links. But at present it is not possible as so many funeral functions have to be taken place. I hope you understand, thanks. AryaPratapSingh grandsonDrRajendraPrakashSingh (talk) 11:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Media are private its true. But, there is orginisation to monitor there activities, if they publish propaganda or not. And, as I mentioned earlier Wikipedia is not someone's website. Its encyclopedia. And even your added info are not referenced and it is not in encyclopedic style. I have to mention again as you claimed about you can not edit his article as per WP:COI. And, as you say, reference are not available we can not accept unreferenced info. As you claimed he got honor in his funeral like Atal Bihari Vajpeyee and its is very rare honor, why it is not published on media. I gave you final warning please stop your spamming. Thanks.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello, I'm S. M. Nazmus Shakib. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rajendra Prakash Singh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm S. M. Nazmus Shakib. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rajendra Prakash Singh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. If you do not remove unreferenced info, I will make an application for your block. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rajendra Prakash Singh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Grey joy talk 11:41, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Rajendra Prakash Singh. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Grey joy talk 12:37, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Rajendra Prakash Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Grey joy talk 12:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)