User talk:Aryan330

Kindly respond
Please use TAlkpage of Sambhaji or Soyarabai to continue the discussion and not the Mughal-Maratha wars.Thanks. Jonathansammy (talk) 15:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @Jonathansammy but on that talk page no need to improve because they didn't have any unconstructive edits,only Mughal-Maratha wars contain it which itself added just 5 days ago by Fowler & fowler.
 * So kindly look my reply on that talk page.
 * Thanks Aryan330 (talk) 16:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Melechha. Thank you. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 07:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Your recent editing history at Maratha–Portuguese War (1683–1684) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wareno (talk) 15:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Blasphemy
I saw your comments in the ANI thread. I think the user you reported deserves sanction, but not for the reasons you brought up.

Even if you think the comment was an attack on an Indian god (it is not obvious that it was an attack), there is no policy or guideline on wikipedia that prevents blasphemy. Indeed, many articles (like having photos of Muhammad in his article) would be considered egregious, but are permitted. There is also no "protection against being offended" ; Even if what someone says offends you it, we do not WP:CENSOR.

If you explicitly abuse a religion, it might be sanctionable, but tangential stuff like references to gods is not by any means prohibited.

In the ANI thread, you may have gotten a bit worked up over what you see as an insult to your religion. However, the long paragraphs, that dont rest on policy are honestly a bit annoying and will likely attract sanctions on you if you keep doing it. Take a step back, calm down a bit, and comment on policy basis if you think necessary. And keep comments short. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 14:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Alert for India/Pakistan/Afghanistan related articles
SKAG123 (talk) 01:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement warning
As a result of this Arbitration Enforcement thread, I am giving you a logged warning to 1) read WP:VAND and stop referring to good-faith edits as vandalism and 2) not engage in excessive discussion of content or conduct issues on unrelated pages (in particular, User talk:SamX). Continuing to do either of these things may result in blocks or other sanctions without further warning. -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 02:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Purandar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Purandar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Vani moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Vani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Rkieferbaum (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Aryan330 read WP:RAJ before making citations. Ajayraj890 (talk) 03:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Maratha raid on Delhi (1737)
Hello, I've noticed that you removed the "move" tag from the Battle of Delhi (1737). It's important to remember that tags shouldn't be simply removed; instead, it's more constructive to engage in the discussion on the Talk page. Ajayraj890 (talk) 14:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long-term battleground behavior, against the interests of the encyclopedia—most recently, filing a retaliatory SPI against a topic-area opponent. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (they&#124;xe&#124;she) 16:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * This is about the SPI, but it's also about the warning I gave you above for similarly inflammatory conduct in the topic area, and it's also about the fact that almost every edit you've ever made has been about arguing with people over the Mughal–Maratha Wars. I considered just topic-banning you but I couldn't convince myself that you are capable of editing constructively in other topic areas, given what I've seen of your edits so far. I'm open to being convinced that I'm' wrong. -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (they&#124;xe&#124;she) 16:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Vani
Hello, Aryan330. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Vani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Vani


Hello, Aryan330. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Vani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)