User talk:Arylic

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Arylic


A tag has been placed on User:Arylic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. INeverCry  23:45, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because… (your reason here) --Arylic (talk) 23:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC) Psh, it’s a user page. I should have free reign to type whatever I please here. Get off of your high-horses. I am saying, stating, that I am going to be correcting fallacious data within wikipages, I.e., helping the community.

Don’t give me this crap about speedily deleting my page for a simple rhyme where I am, rather obviously, stating my hate for the spread of misinformation and my intent to correct said mishaps. What was done here? Nothing. What did I do wrong? Nothing. It’s my USERpage. Leave me be, let me do my work helping the community—FREELY—and go about your OWN day bothering other people, and leave me—someone who is here to HELP—alone.

Good day.

Arylic (talk) 23:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:INeverCry‎, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 00:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

This is crazy.
That’s wrong. I went to his page to see who he was, if he was an admin, and I noticed ACTUAL errors. I corrected said ACTUAL errors. Isn’t that the point? You approve of editing… but only when it makes the other user happy. Yet, guess what? The user THANKED me for the edit, just as I would have THANKED HIM for the edit as well. It’s fixing an ERROR. Erroneous data is a problem, and I am out to fix that. Yet, you as a community are hindering that, by marking me unable to do exactly what I came here TO do.

If he takes offense to my correcting an ERROR, that sounds like a personal problem to me, you know what I mean? That’s not business. That’s personal. Either proofread before corrections, or don’t post. Yes, I also indicated it was a MINOR edit, as is required, because it was fixing grammatical and punctuational errors. It’s mere coincidence that his post had errors to correct. Thus, I corrected them. But he DIDN’T. He THANKED me. Just as I, as I said, would have done for HIM. “Thank you for fixing my grammatical errors. I hate when I accidentally type you’re in place of your.” And it’s true. We all do. Just because there are a few people who get upset and immaturely hurt over their ERRORS being correct doesn’t mean I’m not going to correct them. That’s pure idiocy, can you not see that? Erroneous data is erroneous data, and erroneous data needs to be purged or fixed. Period.

What would you have done had you seen the page? You would’ve corrected them. Did I delete ANY data? Did I change ANYTHING at except a colon that should’ve been a semi-colon and fix—a pet peeve of mine—you’re to your? You’re ≠ your.

That is not being rude, that is not being a smarmy, and that is not doing wrong. That is correcting an error. For example, if I were to make an error in MY spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar, I’d expect others to correct it as well, so long as the general context of the post and my voice was not changed.

NEITHER of which I did to him. That is that. Period. I have no more to say on the matter. End of discussion.

Arylic (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)