User talk:Asarelah/archive 8

Please stop removing the Categories belonging to Yemenite Rabbis
User:Asarelah, I have noticed where you have been removing the designation of "rabbi" in the categories of certain well-known rabbis, such as here and here. This is tantamount to vandalism or disruptive editing, and I must ask you kindly to stop doing so, or you will be reported.Davidbena (talk) 23:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I noticed where you have ignored my message, as you can see here. You may think that having a category of "Yemenite rabbis" is redundant, but what you fail to realise is that not all Yemenite Jews are rabbis and, therefore, when one wishes to look specifically for a Yemenite rabbi, placing them in an all-inclusive category makes searching for them harder to do. The purpose of a category is to make it easy to find a specific topic.Davidbena (talk) 13:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I clipped the redundant category of Yemenite Rabbis and Yemenite Jews because they were already in the category of Yemenite Orthodox Rabbis, which is a subcategory of Yemenite Rabbis and Yemenite Jews. Asarelah (talk)
 * If that was truly your intent and purpose, then all is fine. Sorry for the misunderstanding. So, the rabbis are listed under the category, "Yemenite Orthodox rabbis." Great! Please accept my apologies to you.Davidbena (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Opechancanough.jpg


The file File:Opechancanough.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Cppying within Wikipeda
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please do this. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Hannah Witneg concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hannah Witneg, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Queen Emma

 * See Emma.

A depiction of Emma exists, and it is in the public domain — made by François-Séraphin Delpech. The image. Emma is called Berthe here, but the inscription says this is the depiction of Rudolph's wife. — Mychele (talk)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.85.162 (talk) 10:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * How do you know its the same Rudolph though? Asarelah (talk) 12:38, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delpech made depictions of French kings and consorts. There was only one King Raoul/Rudolph of France, although I donʻt know why the artist would call Rudolphʻs wife Berthe. Philip Iʻs wife was Bertha. However, I noticed Delpech depicted wives only if he depicted monarchs, and there is no depiction of Philip I. Perhaps we can add image of "Berthe" into article about Emma, with the description "Possible depiction of Emma, here called Berthe, by François-Séraphin Delpech". — Miha (talk) 08:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I dunno, it may have been an error on the artists part to have said it was king Rudolph's wife. It just seems too iffy to really use. But if you want to put it in the article that's your perogative. Asarelah (talk) 13:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hannah Witneg


Hello, Asarelah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hannah Witneg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 13:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freespiritalliancelogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Freespiritalliancelogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lappawinsoe.jpg


The file File:Lappawinsoe.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on February 14 ‎. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As previously mentioned, sources are required for all new entries to DOY articles. Toddst1 (talk) 20:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ecclesiagnosticalogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ecclesiagnosticalogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

March Madness 2020
G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Proposed deletion of File:Bearcutear.jpg


The file File:Bearcutear.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:ChiefGall.jpg


The file File:ChiefGall.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:Pornographic film actors from Maine has been nominated for merging
Category:Pornographic film actors from Maine, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 21:13, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Servantsofthelightlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Servantsofthelightlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Requesting some help
Hi,

Recently initiated a new Draft:Sexual politics and looking for proactive help in updating and expanding the article. Please do see if contributing to Draft:Sexual politics would interest you.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 03:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hannah Witneg


Hello, Asarelah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hannah Witneg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Black Shawl


The article Black Shawl has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources. Being the wife of Crazy Horse does not presume notability, and Wikipedia is not a genealogy."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Black Shawl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Shawl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Black Shawl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of One Who Walks with the Stars


The article One Who Walks with the Stars has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources. The article suggests this person is notable for one event."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Many Horses


The article Many Horses has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of One Who Walks with the Stars for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Who Walks with the Stars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/One Who Walks with the Stars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Many Horses for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Many Horses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Many Horses until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Four Guns for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Four Guns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Four Guns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kaipkire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaipkire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kaipkire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Colestah for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colestah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Colestah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:24, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:QueenAmina.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:QueenAmina.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open
G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marie Schellinck.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marie Schellinck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited January, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aryannationsemblem.png
Thanks for uploading File:Aryannationsemblem.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey I saw your edit
I saw that you removed all this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MobileDiff/996264563&type=revision

I must ask can you explain why? CycoMa (talk) 14:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I also would like to know. Why did you continue editing without addressing this? Natureium (talk) 18:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team