User talk:Asbchoudhary9

Welcome!
Hi Asbchoudhary9! I noticed your contributions to Narayan Beniwal&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! DreamRimmer (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for appreciating my work on Wikipedia Asbchoudhary9 (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ravi Kumar Sihag


A tag has been placed on Ravi Kumar Sihag, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.  You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Deb (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mana Baba Temple has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mana Baba Temple. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Abhaybeniwalreengus. Thank you. DreamRimmer (talk) 07:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
Asbchoudhary9 (talk) 16:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't review blocks that I have imposed myself, I will leave that for another administrator to attend to, but I will say this: your first account was blocked before I discovered this account, because you had used multiple accounts to voice your opinion in an AfD discussion, attempting to give yourself two votes. That is deceptive, dishonest, not a simple mistake, and it only happened last month. Rather than appeal your block at the time, you simply created new accounts and carried on editing. This is not acceptable. My advice to the reviewing admin would be to decline this request, and to direct you to the standard offer. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear Girth Summit,

I would like to express my sincere apologies for my past behavior on Wikipedia that led to my block. I understand and acknowledge my mistake of using multiple accounts to vote in an AfD discussion. I deeply regret my actions and any harm they may have caused to the community.

I appreciate your honesty and the time you took to respond to my unblock request. I understand that you are not reviewing blocks you have imposed and that you advise the reviewing admin to decline my request and direct me to the standard offer. However, I wanted to take this opportunity to show my genuine remorse and my commitment to making amends.

I want to assure you that I have learned from my mistake and that I am fully committed to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I understand the importance of honesty and transparency in contributing to Wikipedia, and I am dedicated to being a responsible and trustworthy contributor moving forward.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

[Asbchoudhary9] Asbchoudhary9 (talk) 16:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)