User talk:Ascendah

Explaining
I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 16:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Warning
It appears you haven't been warned about your probable vandalism, or at least edits with no potential value to Wikipedia.

Edits include
 * 1) False, unsourced, and irrelevant.
 * 2) and   If you were an established editor, it might be considered a jest.  As you have not had previous contact with, it just appears nonsensical.
 * 3) Even if it made sense, it would be about the subject of the article, not about potential improvements in the article.
 * 4) repeated, after being deleted by the subject, as  Personal attack in the apparent form of a WP:Barnstar.
 * 5) Even if it were honest, which would require a suspension of thought processes, it would not sure any purpose in editing Wikipedia.
 * 6) On the face of it, it's a request for information to appear in the article.  However, no one in their right mind, and probably very few not in their right mind, would think it relevant.

If you're not interested in improving the encyclopedia, please go away. The only reason I'm not blocking you as a vandalism-only editor, is that this edit is actually a minor improvement in the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:44, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * LOL — Ascendah (talk) 12:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Huon (talk) 14:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

This blocked user ( [ block log] | [ active blocks] | autoblocks | [ unblock] | contribs | deleted contribs | [ abuse log] ) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)