User talk:AscentIntoOvermind

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, AscentIntoOvermind! Thank you for your contributions. I am Shrikanthv and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Shrikanthv (talk) 12:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

So are you now Overmind ? Shrikanthv (talk) 12:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Overmind
I do know your userid, i was really asking if your are in Overmind now ? (in your real existence ), (you can also type below this comment to chat) Shrikanthv (talk) 09:57, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

I'm afraid not, I'm really a beginner when it comes to Aurobindo but something about him resonates with me. I have felt real changes within myself in recent times as well.

What about yourself, are you in Overmind? AscentIntoOvermind (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * unfortunately not, good to hear that you feel something.... , need your help in editing the article " Integral yoga" would you be interested ? Shrikanthv (talk) 15:27, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I'd be happy to although I have to stress that I really am a novice when it comes to Aurobindo. Let me know how I can help AscentIntoOvermind (talk) 01:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Important information
Please note that this message does not imply that any current administration action is necessary. It is however important to know in advance that on Wikipedia special provisions exist in relation to the topic:

Welcome and happy editing, — Paleo Neonate  – 05:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ganzfeld experiment, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ixocactus (talk) 04:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm McSly. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to James Randi‎ seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McSly (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to James Randi. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 00:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at James Randi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 00:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. McSly (talk) 22:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at James Randi‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)