User talk:AsceticRose/Archive 3

2023 and others
Fictional events from cultural works are not real events, so exits an expecifics articles named: Works of fiction set in... that I'm helping to expand. (see also: Works of fiction by year) --Vsuarezp (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * What you are doing may be right Vsuarezp. However, you should first seek with other editors' opinion on the respective articles' talk pages as it appears to be a sensitive change. You can revert my two edits, if necessary. - Ascetic Rosé   17:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

your message to me
Thanks, from susiedarling for your message. I fail to see what you mean by not constructive, when you interfered with my edits of scouting Australia. I edited the history section. It was not constructive before my edit as the page was about scouts Australia yet did not contain info about the beginnings of scouts Australia, and made only shallow references. I have read much about the subject thank you, and I happen to be a neice of the original Australian founder, Mr Charles Smethurst Snow. Perhaps you should stick to subjects you know about dear. If I continue to see the work of my uncle omitted and lied about, I will make a complaint to its head person. Thanks
 * You, Susiedarling, totally blanked the page here that contained 29 references. I restored it here. You don't have the authority to blank a page. It is clearly unconstructive. Probably you will be benefited from familiarizing yourself with Wikipedia rules and policies (like Five pillars of Wikipedia, community consensus, assuming good faith, What Wikipedia is not) before making any more such edit. Also note that threats do not work in Wikipedia. It is only the policies that work here. Thank you. -- Ascetic Rosé   16:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * A look at your talk-page shows that you are regularly blanking sourced pages/sections or adding unsourced materials to various pages at your sweet will. This is the time to stop it or you risk being blocked. - Ascetic Rosé   16:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

From susie darling

I will look at how to include sources. A much better response. And I will decide what is relevant for the history of my family members,thank you. As for your claim all on wiki is real, what rubbish. You allow people who are in business to gain ground over others by spreading lies, and by omitting details in order to favor themselves. Omitting is a form of fraud. (source,Family law Act.Australia) You are not Allah, and cannot always tell what is a lie and what is not. I suggest your efforts are also put to further studies, perhaps the good book. I am just wondering, where you said constructive, perhaps you meant constructed, as in'your page could have been better constructed'

hey help me out to get out page Mahika Sharma out of deletation issue. Help me to lock up the page. Please respond — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwikiperson (talk • contribs) 17:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Recent Edit
My recent edit (on Coutinho) was removing an opinion. There is no place for an opinion on articles. I also added more information to a paragraph that was irrelevant to make it reasonable for the paragraph to remain instead of being removed. Your edit will be undone.

Please DO NOT undo changes to George L. Rose page.
I am updating Mr. Rose's page to correspond to the present state of his life and accomplishments. Whatever changes I made and am going to make over the course of the next day or two are relevant and present a more complete picture of George L. Rose continuing charitable work and other endeavors. Since you are not in possession of that information and I am, you are not in the position to judge its relevancy. My computer device crashed which perhaps may account for work in progress. When I complete my work on this page together with appropriate citation, then if you still so wish, you can chnallenge what is written. Meantime please hands off.

GLR9763Glr9763 (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Dear Glr9763, try to provide reliable sources in support of your change, and always leave an edit summary sothat others understand what you are doing. Happy editing. - Ascetic Rosé   03:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Rape by Gender
You undid my changes to the Gender and Rape article based on the pretext that they were vandalism and were not sufficiently explained. If you examine the Talk page for that article, under the section entitled "14 Assertions about the number of male-victim prison rapes exceeding the total number of female-victim rapes." you will see that I explained the reason for removing the Daily Mail assertion, as its figures a) do not accord with DoJ statistics about sexual assault; b) compare two different kinds of incidents under the pretext that they are equivalent. They are further contradicted by an analysis performed by Stephanie Zvan here *http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamonds/2012/02/12/mras-still-wrong-on-prison-rape/.

The footnote [3] that I edited just a few minutes ago was changed because it compared two numbers that were derived using different methodologies, and because it is contradicted by the Zvan analysis.

I am reverting your changes. If you can justify your reasons for leaving the Daily Mail quote in the article, please add them to the Talk page of the Rape by Gender page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holymadness (talk • contribs) 16:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Dear Holymadness, Daily Mail is a reliable source. But the source you mentioned is a blog which is generally not considered on Wikipedia a reliable source. - Ascetic Rosé   15:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

The Daily Mail is not a reliable source. It routinely publishes false information and misrepresents the content of peer-reviewed research. In this case, its article misleadingly distorts the conclusions of the 2011 DoJ report I linked to in the Talk page of the article, and is contradicted by a 2013 DoJ report about the incidence of female sexual harassment. Again, if you want to defend the Daily Mail's claims, you are free to do so in the Talk page of the Rape by Gender article.Holymadness (talk) 16:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

PCB Piezotronics
Hi I am trying to add content into Wikipedia about PCB Piezotroincs. I wanted to refer back to PCB's website, I'm not sure where the information would come from besides their site. I read in the rules that your not supposed to use a companies website URL, but I looked at Bruel & Kjaer's page and almost all of their references refer back to their own site. How are they doing this without there content being deleted? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emsobieraski (talk • contribs) 18:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Dear Emsobieraski, thanks for contacting. A company's official website is sometimes used, but you must find third-party sources to add information. You can do it by searching Google. If Bruel & Kjaer's page information come from only their own site, it is a mistake and probably will be deleted by someone. Your addition looked like an advertisement which in not accepted on Wikipedia because Wikipedia's goal is not to promote anything/anyone but to uphold information in a neutral way. Headings like "What does PCB mean?", "What is Piezoelectricity", "Who are PCB's Customers?", "How are PCB Sensors Use?" are not accepted in any encyclopedia, and can be converted to Meaning of PCB, Piezoelectricity, PCB Customers, Use of PCB Sensors respectively. Comments like We consider PCB customers to be our friends... must be avoided, and should be written in a neutral way. You can look Apple Inc. for example. Thanks. - Ascetic  Rosé   04:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

New section
I am Manya and I know my personal life better than you. If paparazzi had wrong information about me, you do not need to change my information. I am a US citizen now and if you do not leave my page alone, I will gave to take legal action.
 * Dear Manya, here on Wikipedia, we go by reliable sources. I reverted your deletion of some texts because they were sourced. If you think you were right, please provide reliable sources in support of your edit, or discuss on the article's talk page. And be sure that legal threats do NOT work on Wikipedia. Thanks. - Ascetic Rosé   17:33, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

The sources you have cited are from film news that is inaccurate. I know how to take action, be it wiki or whatever. You are intruding into my private life. I am not going to put my marriage certificate and birth certificate on file to prove my point.You said " If you think you were right, please provide reliable sources in support of your edit." In the USA, date of birth and private information is confidential. Do you think anyone will have media/public sources to support such facts? I am Manya and you are talking about me! Do you think you know me better than myself just because some media articles write whatever they want? Lets see what works legally when you try to edit false information about me on wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manyabjp (talk • contribs) 17:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Manyabjp, on Wikipedia, reliable sources mean books, newspaper/journal articles etc., not private certificates. There should be some newspaper articles which you can use in support of your editing. You can discuss on the article's talk page. No, I don't know you better than yourself, but On Wikipedia, we make edits following its own rules. An wiki-article is not your property. Again, threats do NOT work on Wikipedia. Let's try. - Ascetic Rosé   18:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

As I read the guidelines, anything that infringes copyright may be deleted. As a writer with 40 years experience, I take copyright infringement seriously.

On the other hand, I reasoned that massive deletions would be mis-characterized as vandalism, and the article would be reverted. And comments on the talk page are taken as seriously as someone reporting to the customer service desk that the restroom is filthy. The whole point of the sign asking shoppers to tell customer service that the john is filthy is that it's cheaper to post a sign once than to keep cleaning the john regularly. There's usually ample evidence that the john hasn't been cleaned in a month.

So my notice that the page in violation of 17 USC is disruptive, but the notices that say "citation needed" are not? Why do I get the feeling that if I checked the page history, I'd find that the thief who put that page together with all that stolen content was you?

Kindly remove your foil-lined hat and defecate in it before returning it to your head. It's vandalizing pages like this reversion that gives Wikipedia such a slimy reputation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.193.238.99 (talk) 22:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

rv
Where's the vandalism in this? 93.139.61.85 (talk) 12:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * First, you did not explain what your edit was about. Why were you putting the word Serbian all over? What is your reference? - Ascetic Rosé   12:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I was not putting it all over, I was putting it there where it ought to be. The page is about linguistic borrowings and influences that are part of the Balkan Sprachbund. Some of the examples only apply to very specific forms of Serbo-Croatian and not to all or even majority of Serbo-Croatian. I added Serbian there were the examples can only be true for the Serbian standard language and for Serbian colloquial language, and where they're not true for other standard varieties of Serbo-Croatian.
 * As for reference, Serbo-Croatian grammar and Comparison_of_standard_Bosnian,_Croatian_and_Serbian are quite exhaustive and the latter link in particular shows that the things that I marked as Serbian are part of Serbian but not of other varieties. 93.136.1.243 (talk) 14:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Your edit to the "Mirror Image" page, today
Hello, I have just noticed that you've removed my "improvements".

I thought my changes were quite helpful really. Please contact me sometime. There's no hurry to do so. Robert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert James 2014 (talk • contribs) 13:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Robert, thanks for coming here. It was removed for several reasons. Your added content was unsourced. For scientific information, we need to provide reliable sources. Second, as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, its language should be encyclopedic. Sentences like Look at the photograph of the pottery vessel, and For example, look at a page of writing and then turn it... are not accepted. Rather, the previous language was neutral which you changed. Again, you should not write This article is about images in plane (flat) mirrors. You should not create too many single-sentence paragraph.


 * Of course, Wikipedia appreciates your contributions. However, we have to do so following the policies. See Five pillars of Wikipedia, neutral point of view, no original research, providing reliable sources, What Wikipedia is not. - Ascetic Rosé   17:47, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Your message to me about my contribution to the "Mirror image" page.
Hello Ascetic Rose, Thanks for your message. Editing this page was my first attempt at editing Wikipedia. As I suspected, it's just too much hassle, from my point of view. It will be a very long time before I try again. Perhaps you could put a note on this article suggesting that it requires improvement. Best Wishes, Robert.

PS: I can't do the acute accent on Rose on my computer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.235.65.1 (talk) 09:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

hello
Welcome ascetic rose, finally you are returned among us. Wikipedia needs users like you. Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.186.199 (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Okean Elzy
Hi, You reverted an edit by me as "Vandalizm". Why do you think the detailed announcement of a local tour from last year is so important? This is dated information, as there is no hint if this tour actually took place. And an Ukraine-tour isn't something special for a ukrainian band. E.g. this year according to their website they have concerts in USA and Europe. This would have been much more noteworthy. Unless you gave some reasons, i plan to revert your revert in a few days. Thanks. Арвед (talk) 12:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was not a vandalism. After careful observation, I agree it can be removed. Thanks Арвед for pointing that out. - Ascetic Rosé   15:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

New section
I originally posted an article about a minor that editors have marked for deletion. After viewing the comments that were harmful i removed the proposed article. Maybe I did it wrong but I was trying to obey the guidelines and was complying with deletion. Maybe you can help me due to the circumstances as the minor subject should not be injured by the process in which they are not involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanford2000 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Stanford2000, you must not blank a page in any circumstances. Blanking a page does not delete it. You can add more information on it. And most probably, the page will be able to avoid deletion. Thanks. - Ascetic Rosé   02:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hajj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CABI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Hajj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mansura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hajj
The article Hajj you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hajj for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shii -- Shii (talk) 18:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hurrah, it was passed a good article on 8 October! - Ascetic Rosé   03:18, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=628612797 your edit] to Hajj may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * [File:Arafat pilgrims.jpg|thumb|Pilgrims on the plains of Arafat on the day of Hajj]

ANI notice
You are involved in this: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents --Calcula2 (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * A good amateurish enterprise on part of Calcula2. - Ascetic Rosé   03:18, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * User talk:Calcula2 has been blocked for sock-puppetry. - Ascetic Rosé   10:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring
You are involved here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:AsceticRose.2C_User:Fauzan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calcula2 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * So, this also failed to bear any fruit, hah!, you should know that threats do not work on Wikipedia. - Ascetic Rosé   15:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Bulk email software
Hi there, You marked my edit as "Vandalizm". Any "bulk email software" has a facility of smtp rotation which actually allows sending email massages in bulk. This is a common feature of that sort of software. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volts-t (talk • contribs) 19:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Your edit again has just been reverted by ClueBot NG here. Try to add some reliable sources and edit summary. And what about changing Since the bulk email software usually sends email... to  Since the bulk email software or usually sends email...? - Ascetic Rosé   00:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

UPDATE: Thank you.  Since the bulk email software or usually sends email... that is my typo, sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volts-t (talk • contribs) 14:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, Thanks for coming here. If you make edits regularly and provide edit summary (a short box below), I hope you will not face problems like being reverted by others, or by . And, always sign your comment by typing ~ at the end of your comment. You can contact me for any inquiry. Though currently I am not so active on Wikipedia, I'll try to respond. - Ascetic Rosé   17:08, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit reversal and your comment to me (sdmarathe)
I do accept that I removed the entire sentence - but if you read the edit history - you can see that the allegations were presented as facts. It is in Wikipedia policy to mention allegations - as such - allegations. You can not use terms like "directly linked" or "commonly known" = when they are allegations from one side of political spectrum to the other. I could in theory add a few more sentences that demean other point of view - and that is not the right thing to do. In my latest edit, I left all citations (however inflammatory and inaccurate they may be) - but have corrected the verbiage. I replaced terms like commonly known or directly linked - to "it has been alleged". Please respond to my talk before judging my edits - when in fact - the reversal of my edits in fact reinstated allegations as facts  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdmarathe (talk • contribs) 01:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Security-Dubai International
Why is it you changed my edit? I only updated the page with more up-to-date information. If you don't believe what I edited, watch the documentary on the Discovery Channel. The Security states the penalty on camera, knowing full well he was being filmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrTruth67 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi MrTruth67, please provide the diff (link) of which you are talking about. Thanks. - Ascetic Rosé   15:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I guess this one. So, where is your sources to support your hyperbolic claims? What do you mean by and so they can cart you away without anyone else catching it on video? And, you inserted text inside a quote. - Ascetic Rosé   15:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Swami Nithyananda page
With respect to your interest in adding the "He allegedly invited actress Nayantara to his ashram to relieve her off stress." , my objection is not to the content but it is an allegation. Allegation by a second rate newspaper. All allegations are not of encyclopedic interest. This is gossip news created by the actresses' PR company to bring her into focus. I fail to understand why you want this to appear as the second line of the introduction to the page. Please explain. Acnaren (talk) 03:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Acnaren, I've already said in edit summary that the content can be placed at a suitable location other than the lead, if you like. As for the statement being an allegation, the sentence accordingly presents it as an allegation by saying that He allegedly invited actress Nayantara.... So I don't see any problem here. And how can we confirm that [t]his is gossip news created by the actresses' PR company to bring her into focus?


 * As you said your objection is not to the content, you can place it below under any suitable section. - Ascetic Rosé   14:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tariq Jameel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jati Umra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Kalki avtar and Muhammad
Peace be upon you brother, please read this important Afd and vote. Articles for deletion/Kalki Avtar aur Muhammad sahib (book) Sharif uddin (talk) 15:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear @Sharif uddin, unluckily that good article was deleted. It's a pity that me and AsceticRose couldn't vote it. -- 115ash →(☏) 11:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tariq Jameel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IHRC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

read it
you have been sent an email. --  AHLM13  talk 17:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Tariq Jameel page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=653388644 your edit] caused an ISBN error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F653388644%7CTariq Jameel%5D%5D Ask for help])

Definition of expatriate
I noticed that you reverted my little change to the "Expatriate" page, which I expected of course. Contrary to what you might think though, I was not trying to vandalize the page, but instead wanted to add a bit more reality to the definition of the word. The way the article stands now, I feel like it is doing a huge disservice to the community by pretending to ignore the race issue surrounding the usage of the word expatriate. You seem to be somewhat of an officiator on Wikipedia, so I urge you to please look into this. Check out these articles about the usage of the word expatriate if you think I'm talking out of my ass:

http://www.newser.com/story/204085/difference-between-expat-immigrant-how-white-you-are.html

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/mar/13/white-people-expats-immigrants-migration

I know these are not peer reviewed papers or anything academically substantial, but I urge you as a senior member of the Wikipedia community to bring this to light, or at least start a serious discussion about it, if not make the necessary changes to the article.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.150.186.190 (talk) 01:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi 122.150.186.190, it will be long debatable to say An expatriate is usually a white person..., I guess. We need more reliable sources to comment on this. You can raise the issue on the article's talk-page for discussion, with sources.
 * Another important point is that we can't say outright that An expatriate is usually a white person.... What we can say is that some scholars think that the term is exclusively used only for western white people going to work abroad or something like this, with sources. When you add information on any article, provide sources in support of your added information, as a rule. There are some rules and guidelines to add information on Wikipedia.
 * See Five pillars of Wikipedia, providing reliable sources, neutral point of view, edit summary for more datails. Thanks. - Ascetic Rosé   10:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

New section
my edit on alarm clocks was purely for comedic value and was receiving very appropriate responses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrchief11 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * For comedic value? Wikipedia is not a place of fun. Thanks. - Ascetic Rosé   15:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Although there are some fun places on Wikipedia like these - List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create, Lamest edit wars, Please bite the newbies. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

vote here
could you vote here, and here? Keep an eye to this Islamophobic. Jazakallahkhair.--  AHLM13  talk 17:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Flag Update
As of 2012 the tone in the color of Puerto Rico's flag has been officially changed back to the original light blue.

Sources: http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/carmenyulincambiaralasbanderas-746470/ Aventurero98 (talk) 14:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. - Ascetic Rosé   01:13, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to join discussion
I would like to request you to join this discussion, please. It's about removing some specific people from the voting list. Please read through what has already been discussed and state your opinion, it will be appreciated.

Thanks

Rihaz (Talk to me • What I do) 17:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello!
السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ, it'd be useful if you remove some of your votes (which appear a little be unnecessary) from Swami Vivekananda, Salman Khan, Pranab Mukherjee and others, and add new negative votes on those possess between 2 and 4 positive votes all in all. THANKS. -- 115ash →(☏) 13:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Wa alaikum As-salam 115ash, I could not understand what you actually meant. Are you saying to put nay vote to those which contain only 2-4 ayes votes? But in that case, those containing only 2-4 ayes votes will automatically be rejected for having low votes. What is the use of adding nay vote? - Ascetic Rosé   00:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. Now it doesn't matter. Take care! -- 115ash →(☏) 09:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * You are invited to leave a vote here. -- 115ash →(☏) 09:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

ratification of collage at Talk:Bengali people
Hi, you previously voted in a poll at Talk:Bengali people to decide on whose pictures are to appear in a collage at Bengali people. The poll has now closed and a request for ratification of the final list has been sent out. If you wish to do so, please come to Talk:Bengali people thanks Coolabahapple (talk) 18:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

help
Assalamualaikum brother. I want create a page about this, but I have never created an article before. Help me. --  AHLM13  talk 18:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Excuse
Is your name zahida suleiman? Sharif uddin (talk) 20:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Typing Urdu - IbneZia
wa alaikum us salaam. Thank you for your message on Urdu Wikipedia. Typing Urdu on devices was a hell of a job once, but now it is much much easier. Whether you use Windows OS or Linux, you can just add an Urdu keyboard and that's all for typing Urdu. Many phonetics keyboards are available online. Or you can simply search for Pak Urdu Installer, that will install Urdu keyboard, a few good Urdu fonts and will enable all settings, required for typing Urdu. Using phonetic keyboard is very simple. A for Alif, B for Bay, P for Pay, K for Kaaf, J for jeem, G for Gaaf... and so on.

Or you may use Google Docs. Choose Urdu language from File menu and enable right-to-left direction. When you select right-to-left, a small box appears on tool bar with an alphabet, ٹ. Click on it, and start typing roman Urdu; like "aap kesay hain?" and it will automatically transliterate in Urdu.

I'm really impressed for your active work at English Wikipedia. It took me so long to write a reply because your talk page attracted me first and I started reading and reading it. I wish Urdu Wikipedia has more active contributors. --ابنِ ضیا (talk) 10:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi ابنِ ضیا, thanks for your reply. I will respond on your Urdu talk-page soon. - Ascetic Rosé   04:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring IPs
AssalamuAlaikum, can you please warn and/or report the IP's who are edit warring at Battle of Badr and God in Islam? I am short of time. -- Fauzan ✆ talk ✉ mail  03:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Wa alaikum as-salam, I've rather made a request for page protection as the problem-user's IP is somewhat dynamic. Let's see how that works. - Ascetic Rosé   23:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

ALBA Games - biennial or biannual?
Hi. ALBA Games is held once every two years. The article now states that the games are biannual, which means twice every year. I changed it to biennial, which means every second year. How was my contribution not construcive? Ssu (talk) 10:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for raising the issue here. Actually the problem is that in previous versions, it was mentioned biannual. You changed it to biennial but did not provide any reliable source in support of it. So, how can we be sure that it is biennial? If still you know for sure that the ALBA Games are two-yearly, you can change it again; I will not mind. - Ascetic Rosé   04:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no reliable source in the stating that the games are biannual either? I simply corrected the text. The article itself also lists the games, in every two years, and even: "Since then it was decided that Cuba and Venezuela will be switching editions every two year". I find it almost comic that my correction is reverted in this way. The article as it stands now is contradicting itself. Ssu (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The reverting is even explained with "unexplained change", but I wrote an edit comment: Not twice a year. Ssu (talk) 10:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * (talk page stalker) Looking at the article, it's clear it only happens once every 2 years, as there are results for 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011. Looking for actual source though. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like they've added a source, the problem is most people wrongly think biannual= once every 2 years. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe we should add a parenthesis, something like (held every 2 years)...? Ssu (talk) 11:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Welcome, and thanks for adding a source. I've made the wording clearer (see here) to avoid confusion. And sorry for the way your edit was reverted. I hope you will continue editing and will enjoy your stay on Wikipedia. - Ascetic  Rosé   16:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I mainly work on no-wiki (10 years now), but do some corrections om en-wiki if I spot them. This revert was not executed well, I felt that my correction was regarded vandalism. I hope you look more closely on edits before you revert them in the future. Assume good faith. Happy editing! :-) Ssu (talk) 16:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Urdu Wikipedia
I am having problem typing urdu. Can you visit Urdu wikipedia.

بھیجاں  تھودا ہوشیار  رہیگا ، کاسمک یمپرور   نقلی    بنایا ہے. ایڈمنسٹریٹر کو  گلی دیگا. ہونگے آپ. کیونکی کاسمک یمپرور   ہے. Aceticrpose mard aurat بلکل   جیشا نام ہے. --BLueisblosso (talk) 09:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Qari Waheed Zafar Qasmi


The article Qari Waheed Zafar Qasmi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability, no reliable sources, the content is largely unverifiable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

The edit to OS X Mavericks you reverted was definitely vandalism
This edit, which you reverted, was not just unexplained, it was vandalism; see more cowbell. Guy Harris (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, yes, that edit was a sort of vandalism. Thanks for noting that. - Ascetic Rosé   22:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Please Do Not Change My Edits
It has come to my attention that you are changing my edits. I have gone back and cited my sources so there is no reason you should be changing them back. Do not change them again or else one of us will get in trouble for edit warring. Thanks. LeJBoy0 (talk) 23:10, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I was actually composing a post to you about this when posted. The only edit summary on these reversions was "unexplained changes," which isn't really enough to understand why the changes were reverted. You also didn't give any talk page feedback. It looked to me like those edits added valuable content, and even though they were unsourced, summary reversion hardly seemed called for. LeJBoy0 isn't a vandal, and I'm worried that if we treat new editors this way, they're not going to come back.  agt x  23:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Please disregard the post made by LeJBoy0, as he is a sockpuppet of an indef-blocked user. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 01:10, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Guess he is a vandal. agt x  01:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for letting me know your concerns, and I care for them. However, when we take care to treat new users, we at the same time have to follow our core policies so that this encyclopedia is not reduced to a low-standard encyclopedia. - Ascetic Rosé   16:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello my friend Asceticrose
Yes you did a mistake. Because there is no fact that Harira has algerian origin. It is 110% moroccan and the fact why it is served in Algeria particulary Oran is due to the proximity to Morocco. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moroccancuisine (talk • contribs) 17:53, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * In that case, you have to provide reliable sources so that your claim can be substantiated. Please note that you are making other unconstructive edits as this one. It is the article on Maghrebi mint tea. You can not change it to Moroccan mint tea. - Ascetic Rosé   18:09, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Reverting my edit on the Tuple page
Hey, AsceticRose, just wanted to let you know that I was not testing or vandalizing the page on Tuple, the information I added (3-tuple also being known as a triad) is based off WolframAlpha, which you can see my source here. If you could redo my edit, that would be great or feel free to let me know what you think. Thanks.

DonkeyCore (talk) 02:53, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Image of Homer Plessy
I apologize for editing the image, but it was not of Homer Plessy. It is an image of former Louisiana politician Pinckney Pinchback.

Best LanceLancedsullivan (talk) 21:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, are you pretty sure that the image is not of Homer Adolph Plessy? How do you know this? A google search however brings this image. Thanks. - Ascetic Rosé   00:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)