User talk:Asclepias

thanks, A:
for editing the conspiracy theory stuff out of the Taos Hummmmmmm section of the Taos article. Carptrash 20:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

photos d'archi effacées
Bonjour, Oui l'idéal est de restaurer les uploads originaux pour l'historique et le nom de l'auteur, mais je n'ai pas les droits d'admin ici et les admins se soucient généralement peu (ou se méfient) de restaurer des images déplacées sur Commons puis effacées. Par contre je me tiens à ta disposition pour restaurer des images en urgence. Greudin (talk) 19:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello, je suis repassé sur l'article, elles ont encore été éffacées en masse, pas trop le temps d'enquêter mais as-tu une explication, je pensais avoir montré patte blanche pourtant ? Greudin (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Source d'une image
Mmm je viens de check et on n'avait pas de source ici non plus. Potentiellement ça ne serait pas gênant si l'image était bien PD mais tu me mets un doute là: je me demande si cette pièce existe vraiment vu qu'elle n'est pas sur le site de la banque. -- lucasbfr  talk 07:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
Hello, Asclepias,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec) Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

restore
I have restored these images:


 * File:Eurocoin.va.series3.010.gif
 * File:Eurocoin.va.series3.002.gif
 * File:Eurocoin.va.series3.001.gif
 * File:Eurocoin.va.series2.010.gif
 * File:Eurocoin.va.series2.002.gif
 * File:Eurocoin.va.series2.001.gif
 * File:Eurocoin.va.series1.010.gif
 * File:Eurocoin.va.series1.002.gif
 * File:Eurocoin.va.series1.001.gif

please use them (or lose them). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Ditto for the ones listed on my talk page Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Chambly-Borduas
J'ai vu ta contribution à la page sur la circonscription fédérale de Chambly-Borduas (ajout du candidat du NPD). J'aimerais s'il-te-plaît savoir quelle est ta source, puisqu'ailleurs cela semble incertain si le NPD se présentera dans cette circonscription. 70.83.33.107 (talk) 03:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Bonjour, J'ai indiqué la source de chaque ajout en note dans la page contenant la liste des candidatures, par exemple New Democratic Party of Canada candidates, 2011 Canadian federal election, (et de même pour les listes des candidats des autres partis). (Je n'ai pas recopié ces notes dans chacune des pages de circonscription, puisqu'elles vont devenir inutiles après l'élection lorsqu'on aura les sources vers les résultats d'élection.) Dans le cas de ce candidat, on voit que la source était tout simplement la liste des candidatures sur le site de son parti, telle qu'elle se lisait à ce moment-là (voir site du NPD).  Maintenant, ces listes elles-mêmes sur les sites des partis ont connu quelques changements au cours de la dernière semaine et il se peut que quelques noms soient à revoir à la suite des listes définitives.  Toutefois, le candidat prévu par le NPD dans Chambly-Borduas est toujours sur la liste à ce moment-ci.  Et une vérification sur le site d'Élections Canada montre que sa candidature est aussi officiellement confirmée auprès d'Élections Canada : voir site d'Élections Canada.  -- Asclepias (talk) 11:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Manicouagan (electoral district). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not change information that has been updated due to recent changes in the candidacy of this riding. If you are not Canadian, you should not be editing this article, since you are unaware of what is happening here. Also, the election for 2011 has not happened yet! --Skol fir (talk) 16:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I am sorry, but I need to apologize for one change I made. First of all, I see that you are from Québec, so you are well-informed. Secondly, I just saw an article that proves that Forbes is indeed the Liberal candidate. From the Liberal Website, it looked for awhile like it was Simon Bérubé. The Liberal Website now does not even show the Manicouagan district in their list. It's as if it does not exist for them. We'll see what develops here. --Skol fir (talk) 19:31, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election, 2011
Thanks for fixing that margin of error that I got wrong. I thought I had read the ref carefully enough, but I missed that sub-sample margin. - Ahunt (talk) 14:48, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Formatting Canadian electoral district articles
I am soliciting opinions on how percentages should be shown in electoral district results tables here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Electoral_districts_in_Canada. Your opinion would be welcome. Regards, Ground Zero | t 02:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Question about the copyright eligibility of a movie prop
Greetings. I've been impressed with your knowledge of copyright issues, and I was hoping you might have some insight about this question. Obviously a sculpture in a museum is eligible for copyright protection in the U.S., and obviously the design of a trash can is not. There's a lot of gray area in between. I know that copyright eligibility can be murky territory due to the lack of case law. But do you have any insight into this particular situation? (And is this case, described here, relevant?) All the best, – Quadell (talk) 14:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
—  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   21:41, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Poll reference
Hi, I'm not opposed to this modification, as I think the article should not give importance to polls sponsored by the candidates (as opposed to independent polls) but, for information, a reference about the removed sentence is available on this website. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If it's in that source then use that source, your previous citatation to Paul Dewar's website did not mention that information. Newfoundlander&#38;Labradorian (talk)
 * It was not my citation. Me, I wouldn't even mention in that article a poll sponsored by a candidate, just like I wouldn't mention a poll sponsored by a political party in an article about a general election. However, because of your edit comment, I thought perhaps you wanted to use that information or you wanted to know it. If you don't have a use for it and didn't need it, then no problem. -- Asclepias (talk) 05:53, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited New Democratic Party leadership election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hoang Mai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up
I usually monitor that thread fairly closely, but I missed that discussion.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  00:17, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Ryan Vesey 17:46, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the notification. I replied there. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:36, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hurricane Rita evacuation image
I'm impressed. How did you find http://www.onlyinhouston.org/en/art/151/ ...? Fences &amp;  Windows  23:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page. In this issue: Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->
 * Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
 * Research: The most recent DR data
 * Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
 * Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
 * DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
 * Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
 * Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 18:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Non-U.S. images
Policy about non-U.S. works is now discussed at policy talk page. --George Ho (talk) 21:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Ford Museum copyright
hello!

I contacted Jim about the copyright mess (I saw him on several discussion pages about copyright and presidential portraits, plus he has some background into the NARA project, etc) and here is his excerpted answer:

"During Ford's time in office, the copyright rules required that there had to be notice -- usually words like "(c) 1975 James L. Woodward" or "Copyright 1975 James L. Woodward" -- on the work. Many sculptures and paintings do not have notice and therefore are PD. We use the tag PD-US-no notice on those. That rule changed in 1978 to allow registration or notice and then again 1989 to require neither. See File:PD-US table.svg for a summary."

I can definitely live with this for now. I'm still curious about what the NARA lawyers say. Is this acceptable to you? Happy Holidays! Bdcousineau (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Err ... reasonable doubt?
Well, I spoke a bit too soon. I'm concerned about your description of the precautionary principle policy, which is here. I think your use of the term "beyond a reasonable doubt" misdescribes the policy. It's not that strict. I and many editors say files should NOT be deleted for licensing reasons if "to the best of our knowledge" they are free. And surely,  files should NOT be deleted for licensing reasons if based upon a preponderance of the evidence they are free. Do you think if there is little doubt, there is still significant doubt? I would be happy if you changed/clarified what you posted at WP:Media copyright questions.--Elvey (talk) 01:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Sauvé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Normandy Campaign (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Government House Leader (Quebec), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marc-André Bédard and Michel Gratton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fernand Daoust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Non-free use rationale biog
Perhaps we can come up with a better wording?

In the meantime you might want to review these: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Non-free_use_rationale_biog&limit=500

I'm not the uploader of these, but had added the relevant template so that they were not immediately nuked under F6.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zviane, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Glénat and Hachette. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Asclepias. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Asclepias~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Election Templates
Hi Asclepias. Sorry if I sound terse but I'm forced to work in ten-minute bursts (at best) today; no offense felt or intended.

I notice you've been sourcing the candidates confirmed by Elections Canada. I understand that it would be normal practice to do so, but I've added the © marker to represent such candidates and noted on the proper page that such candidates are not being sourced simply because of the clutter it would cause. [Oh great, in my head this sounds like the cover sheet scene from Office Space.]

Just a heads up.

And thanks for all the great work herding Rhinos. Now if the Marxist-Leninists would just have a candidate page instead of popping up like somebody turned on the sprinkler system at a hotel hosting a Mogwai convention... G. Timothy Walton (talk) 16:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Laval--Les Îles
Thanks for the correction. I couldn't find anything recent when I looked, so assumed it was one of the old Hill Times entries that have so often proven incorrect. I'll restore it this morning and source to the second link you cited. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 11:39, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Sources (Manicouagan)
Seemed a strange place for Grills to parachute to me, but here's what he wrote:
 * Nathan Grills
 * Yesterday at 08:33 · Victoria ·


 * Thank you for the likes! I am standing as a paper candidate for the Green Party in the riding of Manicouagan. Read our full platform here: http://www.greenparty.ca/en/platform


 * Merci pour vos j'aimes! Je suis le candidate-poteau pour le Parti Vert du Canada dans Manicouagan. Lisez notre plateforme ici: http://www.greenparty.ca/fr/plateforme

G. Timothy Walton (talk) 21:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Deleting FD column from election templates
Shouldn't we wait until the final list of confirmed candidates is released before doing this? The last few SD candidates making the confirmed list were not on the website nor did they seem to get any media coverage.

There's even a slim chance some of their incumbents could be elected, and they are a sitting party. It's not like they're Libertarians. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Regarding Mary Barr photo


If the licensing needs to be changed, that's fine. Barr's daughter, Molly, already confirmed with me that all three photos are in the public domain because they were works of an official US government organization during the line of work. Namely, the US Forest Service. The photos were then exhibited at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum and later by the San Diego Air and Space Museum, all while being public domain. Can you change the license to reflect this? Silver seren C 10:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I can't, because personally I don't have direct knowledge of evidence that would allow me to take responsibility for making that statement. If you trust that you possess evidence solid enough to make the statement yourself and you're willing to take the responsibility for it, the template would be PD-USGov-USDA-FS. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, done. Thanks. Does it look okay? Silver  seren C 18:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Almost. ;) 1. Templates about copyright status are usually not supposed to be substituded, but transcluded. For example:  . 2. It's not necessary to duplicate in the permission field what's in the description field or in the status template. 3. Finding and providing references to the photos from a USFS collection or publication would be ideal. If direct references can't be found, then quoting the person who is the source on which you base the statement may be better than nothing, although it's hearsay.  -- Asclepias (talk) 19:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I changed it to a transclusion. And I do remember seeing it in an official publication somewhere. Though the issue was that, while being the same photo, it was in black and white for some reason. Silver  seren C 19:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyright in Spain
Thank you for the detailed answer! It's all so complicated it's amazing that anybody gets it right. Your point about my sources is well-taken. As you probably noticed, my (recent) tendency has been to give more detailed links if the source was unusual (and maybe short-lived), whereas standard image sites, like ArtNet, are simply named. Unfortunately, I've uploaded too many images to go back over them all. I'll simply have to wait to see if any of them are challenged, then respond. I doubt that many will turn out to be copyright violations (the vast majority are over 100 years). Of course, I thought the ones from Spain were OK, too. Again, thank you! WQUlrich (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * PS, I've been in contact with a Commons administrator named "Cookie". I gave her a list of six categories containing non-PD files (mine and other user's). She hasn't indicated if she plans to delete them. WQUlrich (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Peter Ewart CP poster Big Game.jpg
Hi Asclepias. I saw you provided the licensing, etc. for File:Peter Ewart CP poster Big Game.jpg. Perhaps you wouldn't commenting at c:User talk:JoolsA? If the licensing you added to the Wikipedia files is Commons-acceptable, then the Commons' file should be eligible for undeletion and the Wikipedia version could then be deleted, right? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Images of branded sustenance
In regard to Media copyright questions/Archive/2016/December, I didn't notice your reply until much later when I happened to revisit the discussion after it was archived. File:Winter wassail.jpg is the image, what do you think? — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 16:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It may be ok because it shows the whole bottle. The court of appeals decision was about a bottle of vodka, and decided that because the photo showed the whole bottle, then the label was not a problem and the photo was ok. The established practice on Commons is to extend the same principle to all types of bottles, because there doesn't seem to be a reason to make a difference. However, it happens sometimes that some users on Commons delete some files, probably because they are unaware of the court decision and of the practice of Commons. Anyway, I see that you uploaded your file to Wkipedia and you added the "keep local" template. That's a good idea. The file should be ok. About another thing, I see that you chose version 1.0 of the license CC-sa. That may not be such a good idea. Version 1.0 of the CC licenses is the only version that includes a paragraph where the licensor (you) *guarantees* to the licensees (the reusers) that there is no problem. You may prefer a later version of the CC licenses. For example, compare section 5 in the texts of version 1.0 and of version 3.0. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright, thank you very much for the all of the advice you've given me. My door is always open if you have a question that you think I may be able to answer. I changed the license per your suggestion. I usually choose version 1.0 licenses because they are not forward compatible (i.e. same license only), so my work can't be released under future licenses that I may not approve of, but I agree that a warranty isn't a good idea in this case. I wish there was a version that isn't forward compatible and doesn't offer a warranty, but alas. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 23:41, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at User talk:Majora
You are invited to join the discussion at. Marchjuly (talk) 04:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Electric Boat Association
I do not understand why new pages that have been set up in good faith by part timers like me are instantly deleted, when they simply need improvement and support from the 'experts'. I have been a contributor for some 13 years, and I do donate money to the foundation from time to time, but really I just wish to contribute noteworthy articles and improve existing ones, and tbh, I am becoming less inclined to bother every time I have to campaign for my right to publish something new that is noteworthy and of genuine interest to the community. Nor do I understand all the harsh messages coming from various directions: it is almost as if I have done something wrong, rather than tried to help the project. Sorry, but why should I bother submitting new articles - however flawed technically - if that is the kind of negativity I experience? Excalibur (talk) 21:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello Excalibur,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Electric Boat Association for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Home Lander (talk) 18:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quebec general election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jean Boucher ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Quebec_general_election%2C_2018 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Quebec_general_election%2C_2018?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quebec general election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guy Hardy ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Quebec_general_election%2C_2018 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Quebec_general_election%2C_2018?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Leila Goldkuhl Lanvin ss2018.png
I don't know why you from this image, but the image is indeed orphaned. As required by WP:NFCC #7, a fair use image must be in use on an article in the main article space or face deletion. The image was in use on Leila Goldkuhl, but I removed it from there as a blatant failure of WP:NFCC #1, which requires that we do not use non-free images when a free equivalent is available, or could be created. As laid out by Foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy, it is expected that in the case where people are alive we can expect to be able to an image of the person and make it available under a free license. Ms. Goldkuhl is alive, and therefore we can not accept non-free images of her solely for depiction purposes, as was the case in the infobox of the article and as described on the usage rationale on the article, where the uploader said the purpose of use was "Picture meant to show the person the article is written about." Please do not remove the orphaned tag again while the image remains orphaned, nor should the image be restored to the article, as it is clearly unacceptable. If you have questions about this, let me know, I'll be happy to answer. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Agency (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Agency_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Agency_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

List of candidates by riding for the 43rd Canadian federal election
Thanks for all the additions to the page - you do some of the best work. However, I'd like you to look at the Twitter citations I've been using - the template tool that I'm using treats the body of a tweet as title and author is a separate field. I find that this looks better. It's on my control panels as Insert template and the icon is a puzzle piece. It's one of the beta tools or some such. It saves me a lot of time formatting tweets citations. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 18:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It's named TemplateWizard. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 18:26, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for this suggestion. I may have a look at this tool. But I probably will not use it. I think that using the body of the message as "title" is not a good idea. In general, it's too long, and if we pick only one part of the message, we insert subjectivity. More importantly, the message bodies of those tweets, in part because their length allows it and in part because of the political nature of the topic, are often very partisan, much more than real titles that exist in other sources, and I don't like displaying those messages as such in a Wikipedia article, unless it's necessary. The problem is that the template requires something in the "title" parameter, when in general tweets do not have titles, so there's no perfect solution. I came to think that the least inconvenient and more neutral way to fill the parameter is to use the name of the source account. It's a solution that works for me. Of course, other contributors may prefer and use other solutions and that's fine. Anyway, that problem is of little importance, because, as you know, in this election page we're working on, those references are only temporary, so we should not worry too much about it. Thanks for you good work too. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rene Alexandre LeMoyne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trader ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Rene_Alexandre_LeMoyne check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Rene_Alexandre_LeMoyne?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Merci pour votre aide avec les Taschereaux!
Thanks for your help! I don't have an account at the Commons and it's an area of the Wiki-world that I rarely enter into. Appreciate your assistance. As I said, excellent detective work. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Many Thanks!
Thank you for your update of the Wikipedia article concerning Vesna Goldsworthy. I appreciate you saving me the time to add the media. It may have been obvious, but that photo was the first that I have uploaded to Wikimedia. I was going through the posting tutorial, however, I am very glad that you did it for me. Oldsilenus (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)