User talk:Asdfghj2

Thanks
Hi, Asdfghj2, and thanks for adding all those references to Tuskegee syphilis experiment, and for replacing a redundant sentence with more in-depth discussion.

I spot a few minor errors in mechanics, which I'm happy to fix. There are a couple of things I need your help with:


 * 1) One researcher who critiqued how the study was administered and the change in the purpose of the study argued, “instead the economic exploitation of humans as a natural resource of a disease that could not be cultivated or animals in order to establish and sustain U.S. superiority in patented commercial biotechnology”. There seem to be some words missing from that quote. Can you check it?
 * 2) Racial bias is not new to scientific and medical research. Some say despite the negative impact on culture, it was ahead of it’s time in the inclusion of minorities in scientific research being funded by an major institution. What was "ahead of its time"? The NHS?
 * 3) Next sentence: But one cannot ignore the racial bias the study turned out to be. A study cannot be a bias. How would you rephrase that? Maybe "…cannot ignore the racial bias inherent in (or contained in, or revealed by) the study"?
 * 4) The IRBs required that all involved in [the] study be willing and voluntary participants. What it  they didn’t solve was  were the questions and implications about using science to define race and racial categories. That's true, but is it fair to expect institutional review boards to solve such a broad range of problems? It seems kind of like blaming the International Red Cross because there is still war, injustice, and sickness throughout the world.

That's it. I really appreciate what you’ve added, especially all the references. You even gave a source for the Marvel comic. And your user name is so easy to type. ;-) You seem to have done this kind of thing before, but if you have questions or want help, let me know. — ℜ ob C. alias ALAROB 19:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 1 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Template:Cite=book page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=606641016 your edit] caused a missing references list (help | help with group references) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F606641016%7CTemplate:Cite=book%5D%5D Ask for help])