User talk:Asenine/Archive 10

Italian support for Iraq during Iran-Iraq war
I noticed that you put a cleanup tag on the article a very few minutes after it was created. Could you give me some specific ideas what you found to be a problem? It is part of a series of articles on foreign support for Iran and Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war, and interrelates with them.

Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 22:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * In that case, I am confused. The article is written in a third-person and formal style except when quoting. Believe me, I have no problem with constructive criticism, but I have not found generic article-wide tags to be terribly helpful when there is no indication of the specific problem. Could you give me a better idea of what you dislike?


 * There is some delicacy in writing these sub-articles, as they are part of a recent and fragile consensus to reduce POV in a very sensitive page. There are some nuances, primarily in the choice of country and whom it supported (there will be nearly 40 such sub-articles just to reduce some complex POV issues). Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 23:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Maha Elsamnah
I'm nixing the Speedy Delete tag from Maha Elsamnah right now, as I'm still working on the article. She is certainly a notable person within Canada, with frequent calls for her deportation based on her "un-Western" beliefs and her alleged ties to a number of terrorists. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 06:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching
You're doing great so far, but you need to do a little more! :) Rudget  ( review ) 15:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Larry Milberg AfD
Could you please take a look at my comments at Articles for deletion/Larry Milberg? I found an obituary in The New York Times by searching on his full name, Lawrence Milberg. --Eastmain (talk) 23:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 101 classes
Feel free to begin sessions. ESCStudent774441 (talk) 23:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in ...
I saw your name at Wikipedians/Photographers. I revised the pages at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Please consider adding your name to the top of the page at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Tyne and Wear and to any of the other subpages for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 01:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Sherford
Please remove the cleanup tag. They should only be issued to B class articles. Sherford definately isn't B class - see here. You could remove the wikification tag aswell - the article is very small, so it would only take you 20 seconds to wikify it yourself. Bsrboy (talk) 13:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

You too. Is an infobox appropriate for Sherford? Bsrboy (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Lobo (The King of Currumpaw)
I have added some more context. Does it seem OK to you now? (Msrasnw (talk) 08:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC))

Aqua Teen Hunger Force article tone
On April 1st, you tagged the Aqua Teen Hunger Force article with the tone tag, but did not raise any specific concerns on the talk page. What concerns do you feel should be addressed to improve the article? Thanks in advance.  Kamek  (Koopa wizard!) 18:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garradors
Twinkle never finished the nom for you, and the page's creator vandalized the AfD discussion in the process. Just letting you know. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Neologism
Hi, I removed your Neologism tag from Handbra since the article almost has more references than words, including several from major newspapers, so it seems to meet WP:RS and WP:OR. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

2008 Summer Olympics torch relay
When you added the image, you deleted 2/3rds of the article. Uncle Milty (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD
Seriously, this isn't a race. Since I see you've ambitions to become an admin, I strongly suggest that you take the time to examine whether an article passes the standards before filing an AfD, and in almost every possible case, filing less than three minutes after creation (multiple times, too) suggests that you're not. I'm a frequent voter in RfAs, and I would certainly vote to Oppose any candidate with a proven record of failing to spend any time researching before acting.  RGTraynor  15:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I strongly support RGTraynor's comments. I've noticed that you have CSD articles within one minute of its creation. Please try to demonstrate some patience towards any new editors who might not be familiar with what they are doing. I point in particular to your CSD of Years in Waste. I have never heard of this album or the band prior to this but I was able to recognize straight away that it is a perfectly legitimate subject for an article. The newbie editor apparently did not knew what to do with your CSD and erroneously tried to remove the CSD tag while he or she continued working on the article. Consequently, that editor has received multiple warnings for this supposedly disruptive behavior. All of which could have been avoided if you had just exercised some patience. --Bardin (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Jen Bekman Gallery
I'm relatively new, and I think I deleted your additions, accidentally, when I added my references.(Youarecharmmingly (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2008)

Your AFD's
I'm concerned that your nominating articles for AFD only seconds after being published. I at least wait a few minutes to see if there is a possibility for the editor to add references. Please place your AFD's on hold or withdraw. In one of the RFA's, the creator asked that you hold on until tomorrow to allow him/her to add some more items to the articles. Please heed my concerns.  D u s t i talk to me 17:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Drance
hi. it's me. i was wondering what you could tell me about cryptographic hashes.

Drance      I know 7    18:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)