User talk:Asger tjell

March 2017
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hobro— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   Wikipelli Talk   13:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hobro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.   Wikipelli Talk   13:21, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hobro, you may be blocked from editing.   Wikipelli Talk   13:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of City of hobro


A tag has been placed on City of hobro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justeditingtoday (talk) 13:43, 15 March 2017 (UTC)